- Court
- High Court of Karnataka
- Decided
- 21 April 2026
- Bench
- H.T. Narendra Prasad
- Case no.
- WP 7292/2026
Follow Karnataka High CourtFollow H.T. Narendra Prasad
Judgment
NC:(2026:KHC:21711( WP(No.(7292(of(2026( ( , ,,HC-KAR( ( ( IN(THE(HIGH(COURT(OF(KARNATAKA(AT(BENGALURU(
STDATED(THIS(THE(21 (DAY(OF(APRIL,(2026(
BEFORE( THE(HON'BLE(MR.(JUSTICE(H.T.(NARENDRA(PRASAD( WRIT(PETITION(NO.(7292(OF(2026((GM-CPC)( BETWEEN:(( MRS.SINDHU,BHASKAR, W/O.,MR.,BHASKAR,, AGED,ABOUT,49,YEARS, NO.21,,15,A,CROSS,,BENDRENAGAR, UTTARAHALLI,MAIN,ROAD, NDBANASHANKARI,,2 STAGE,,BANGALORE,–,560070.,
…PETITIONER,
(BY,SRI.,RAJKUMAR,R.,,ADVOCATE),
AND:(
MR.,KUMAR.K., AGED,ABOUT,61,YEARS, S/O.,MR.,T.,KRISHNAPPA,NAIDU,, TH RESIDENT,OF,NO.4036,28 ,CROSS, TH ND 18 ,MAIN,,BSK,2 ,STAGE, BENGALURU,-560070.,
…RESPONDENT, Digitallytisignedtiby DHANALAKSHMI (BY,SRI.M,D.,RAGHUNATH,,ADVOCATE,FOR,C/R,), MURTHY Location:0HIGH , THIS,WRIT,PETITION,IS,FILED,UNDER,ARTICLE,227,OF,COURTOF KARNATAKA THE,CONSTITUTION,OF,INDIA,PRAYING,TO,ISSUE,A,WRIT,OF, CERTIORARI, QUASHING, THE, ORDER, DATED:27.02.2026, PASSED, ON, I.A., NO., II, OF, 2026(ANNEXURE-D), DATED:,
07.02.2026, IN, O.S., NO., 26384/2024, BY, THE, HON'BLE, LXXII, ADDITIONAL, CITY, CIVIL, AND, SESSIONS, JUDGE, AT, BENGALURU, (ANNEXURE-A), AND, ALLOW, THE, APPLICATION, AND,ETC., , THIS, PETITION,, COMING, ON, FOR, ORDERS,, THIS, DAY,, ORDER,WAS,MADE,THEREIN,AS,UNDER:, CORAM:, HON'BLE,MR.,JUSTICE,H.T.,NARENDRA,PRASAD,
ORAL ORDER
¶1In this writ petition, the petitioner-defendant has called in question the order dated 24.02.2026 passed by the LXXII Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (for short 8Trial Court9), on I.A.No.1/2026 and I.A.No.2/2026 filed by the defendant in O.S.No.26384/2024, whereby the applications filed by the defendant seeking recall of the order dated
06.12.2025 and reopening of the evidence of PW-1 for the purpose of cross-examination were rejected.
¶2For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their ranking before the Trial Court in Original Suit.
¶3The plaintiff instituted a suit in O.S.No.26384/2024 for ejectment. Upon service of summons, the defendant appeared and filed a written statement. On the basis of the pleadings, the Trial Court framed issues. Thereafter,
the chief-examination of PW-1 was completed. Though several opportunities were granted, the defendant failed to cross-examine PW-1. Ultimately, the evidence of PW-1 was closed on 06.12.2025 and the matter was posted for arguments. Subsequently, on 07.02.2026, the defendant filed I.A.No.1 under Section 151 of CPC and I.A.No.2 under Order XVIII Rule 17 read with Section 151 of CPC seeking to recall the order dated 06.12.2025 and to reopen the evidence of PW-1 and to allow the defendant to cross-examine PW-1. The Trial Court, by the impugned order dated 24.02.2026, dismissed the said applications. Aggrieved by the same, the present writ petition is filed.
¶4It is evident that sufficient opportunities were granted to the defendant to cross-examine PW-1. Despite the same, the defendant failed to avail those opportunities, resulting in closure of the evidence of PW-1. The applications to recall have been filed on
07.02.2026. Nevertheless, in the interest of justice and to afford a final opportunity to the defendant to cross-examine PW-1, this Court is of the view that the impugned order warrants interference, subject to imposing certain cost and appropriate conditions.
¶5Accordingly, the following order is passed: ORDER a) The writ petition is allowed. b) The impugned order dated 24.02.2026 passed by the LXXII Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, on I.A.No.1/2026 and I.A.No.2/2026 filed by the defendant in O.S.No.26384/2024, is set aside. c) The I.A.No.1/2026 and I.A.No.2/2026 filed by the petitioner-defendant are allowed, subject to condition that petitioner-defendant shall pay cost of Rs.30,000/- to the plaintiff on the next date of hearing before the Trial Court.
d) The plaintiff (PW-1) shall be present before the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial Court. e) The petitioner-defendant is permitted to cross examine PW-1 on the date fixed by the Trial Court without seeking any further adjournment.
Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE
DM LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 7
Source: High Court of Karnataka, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.