- Court
- High Court of Karnataka
- Decided
- 15 April 2026
- Bench
- S Sunil Dutt Yadav
- Case no.
- WP 11394/2026
Follow Karnataka High CourtFollow S Sunil Dutt Yadav
Judgment
e -e1e-eeeee e e NC:(2026:KHC:20845 WP(No.(11394(of(2026 IN(THE(HIGH(COURT(OF(KARNATAKA(AT(BENGALURU( THDATED(THIS(THE(15 (DAY(OF(APRIL,(2026( BEFORE( THE(HON'BLE(MR.(JUSTICE(S(SUNIL(DUTT(YADAV( WRIT(PETITION(NO.(11394(OF(2026((LA-KIADB) BETWEEN:(
1., SMT,LAKSHMAMMA, D/O,LATE,GANGAPPA,AND,, LATE.,GANGAMMA,, W/O,BYREGOWDA,, AGED,ABOUT,51,YEARS,, R/AT,,THOTANAHALLI,VILLAGE,, THYAMAGONDLU,HOBLI., NELAMANGALA,TALUK,, BENGALURU,RURAL,DISTRICT-562,111, ,…,PETITIONER, (BY,SRI.,VENKATESH,C,R.,,ADVOCATE), AND: Digitallytisigned by0VIDYA0G0R Location: 1., THE,STATE,OF,KARNATAKA, HIGH0COURT OF DEPARTMENT,OF,COMMERCE,AND,INDUSTRIES, KARNATAKA VIKASA,SOUDHA,,BENGALURU-560,001, BY,ITS,SECRETARY,
2., THE,KARNATAKA,INDUSTRIAL,AREA,, DEVELOPMENT,BOARD, EAST,WING,,KHANIJA,BHAVAN, BANGALORE-560,001,, REPRESENTED,BY,ITS,, CHIEF,EXECUTIVE,OFFICER,AND,, EXECUTIVE,MEMBER., e -e2e-eeeee e e NC:(2026:KHC:20845 WP(No.(11394(of(2026
3., THE,SPECIAL,LAND,ACQUISITION,OFFICER.2(SLO.1), KARNATAKA,INDUSTRIAL,AREA,, DEVELOPMENT,BOARD,(KIADB),, (BMICP),AND,BENGALURU,RURAL,, NO.14/3,,MAHARSHI,ARVINDA,BHAVANA,, ST1 ,FLOOR,,NRUPATHUNAGA,ROAD,, BENGALURU-560,001., …,RESPONDENTS, (BY,SRI.,HARISH,A.S.,,AGA,FOR,R1;, ,,,,,,SRI,H.L.,PRADEEP,KUMAR,,ADVOCATE,FOR,R2,AND,R3), , THIS,W.P.,IS,FILED,UNDER,ARTICLES,226,AND,227,OF, THE,CONSTITUTION,OF,INDIA,,PRAYING,TO,1),ISSUE,A,WRIT, IN, THE, NATURE, OF, CERTIORARI, QUASHING, THE, GENERAL, AWARD, BEARING, NO.KIADB/L.A.Q/297/2024-25,, DATED,
13.06.2024, PASSED, BY, THE, THIRD, RESPONDENT, VIDE, ANNEXURE-A,,IN,RESPECT,OF,THE,LAND,BEARING,SY.NO.39/5,, MEASURING, 4, ACRE, 36, GUNTAS, OF, LAND,, SITUATED, AT, MAVINAKOMMANAHALLI, VILLAGE,, THYAMAGONDLU, HOBLI,, NELAMANGALA,TALUK,AND,ETC., , THIS,PETITION,COMING,ON,FOR,PRELIMINARY,HEARING,, THIS,DAY,,ORDER,WAS,MADE,THEREIN,AS,UNDER:, CORAM:, HON'BLE,MR.,JUSTICE,S,SUNIL,DUTT,YADAV ORAL(ORDER Learned, Additional, Government, Advocate, accepts, notice,for,respondent,No.1.,, Sri, H.L., Pradeep, Kumar,, learned, counsel, accepts, notice,for,respondent,Nos.2,and,3.,,
¶2The petitioner has sought for issuance of writ of certiorari to set aside the General Award at Annexure-'A' dated 13.06.2024 passed by respondent No.3 in respect of land of the petitioner bearing Survey No.39/5, measuring 4 acres 36 guntas situated at Mavinakommanahalli Village, Thyamagondlu Hobli, Nelamangala. The petitioner has also sought for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in terms of Section 29(2) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 (for short 'KIAD Act') and to pass consent Award insofar as it relates to the land to an extent of 4.00 acres 36 guntas bearing Survey No.39/5, situated at Mavinakommanahalli Village, Thyamagondlu Hobli, Nelamangala.
¶3It is the case of the petitioner that she was willing for a consent Award and accordingly, the question of passing of general Award does not arise.
¶4Learned counsel appearing for the respondent - Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board (KIADB) submits that the petition itself could be disposed of while setting aside the general Award insofar as the petitioner is concerned and the respondent - Special Land Acquisition Officer, KIADB would consider the request of the petitioner and pass a consent Award as per law.
¶5In light of the said stand and taking note of the directions passed in W.P.No.15026/2021, the petition is disposed of as follows:-
(i) The impugned general Award at Annexure-'A' dated 13.06.2024 insofar as the petitioner's land is concerned, is set aside.
(ii) Respondent No.3 is directed to consider the claim of the petitioner for passing of consent Award and pass a consent Award in terms of Section 29(2) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966, within a period of four
months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
¶6It is made clear that, in the event, if there is any dispute with regard to entitlement and apportionment of the Award amount, the general Award at Annexure-'A' would stand revived.
¶7Liberty is reserved to the Special Land Acquisition Officer, KIADB to withdraw the amount, if deposited before the Civil Court pursuant to the general Award. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of in terms of the above. SD/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE VGR
Source: High Court of Karnataka, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.