VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Karnataka High Court 2026 › High Court of Karnataka

Amar Singh Dhami v. The State of Karnataka

DISPOSED
Court
High Court of Karnataka
Decided
2 April 2026
Bench
Anu Sivaraman, Vijaykumar A. Patil
Case no.
WPHC 105/2025

Follow Karnataka High CourtFollow Anu SivaramanFollow Vijaykumar A. Patil

Judgment

NC:(2026:KHC:18310-DB( WPHC(No.(105(of(2025( ( , ,,HC-KAR( ( ( IN(THE(HIGH(COURT(OF(KARNATAKA(AT(BENGALURU( NDDATED(THIS(THE(2 (DAY(OF(APRIL,(2026( PRESENT( THE(HON'BLE(MRS.(JUSTICE(ANU(SIVARAMAN( AND(( THE(HON'BLE(MR.(JUSTICE(VIJAYKUMAR(A.(PATIL( WRIT(PETITION(HABEAS(CORPUS(NO.105(OF(2025( BETWEEN:(( ( AMAR,SINGH,DHAMI,

S/O,KABIR,,SINGH,DHAMI,,

AGED,ABOUT,26,YEARS,, ST R/AT,NO.,54,,1 ,CROSS,, BANARGHATTA,ROAD,, GUMPANAPALYA,SIGNAL,,

BANGALORE,SOUTH,, TAVEREKERE,,BANGALORE-560029., …PETITIONER, (BY,SRI.,RAKSHITH,R.,,ADVOCATE), AND:( Digitally ( signedtiby 1., THE,STATE,OF,KARNATAKA, RAKSHA BY,ITS,SECRETARY,, Location: DEPARTMENT,OF,HOME,,High0Court of VIDHANA,SOUDHA,,BANGALORE-560,001, Karnataka ,

2., SUPERINTENDENT,OF,POLICE, MILLERS,ROAD,,BANGALORE-560,001, ,

3., STATION,HOUSE,OFFICER, SURYA,NAGAR,POLICE,STATION, BANGALORE-560,099, ,

4., CHILD,CENTER, NC:(2026:KHC:18310-DB( WPHC(No.(105(of(2025( ( , ,,HC-KAR( ( ( ASSOCIATION,FOR,PROMOTING,SOCIAL,ACTION,

(APSA),APSA,NAMMANE,,ANNASANDRAPALYA,, VIMANAPURA,POST,,BENGALURU-560,017, ,

5., AMRUTHA,SHISHU,VIHARA, (BOYS,HOME), NO.8,,FIRST,STAGE,, 3RD,BLOCK,,HBR,LAYOUT,, BEHIND,BESCOM,OFFICE,, BENGALURU-560,043, ,

6., CWC, REP.,BY,SPP, OFFICE,AT,CWC-1, DR.M.H.MARIGOWDA,ROAD, HOSUR,ROAD,,BNEGALURU-560,029, ,

7., DISTRICT,LEGAL,SERVICE,AUTHORITY, OFFICE,AT,CITY,CIVIL,COURT,COMPLEX, AMBEDKAR,BEEDI,,BENGALURU-01, , (AMENDED,AS,PER,VIDE,ORDER,DATED,10.10.2025), …RESPONDENTS, (BY,SRI.,B.A.BELLIAPPA,,SPP-1,WITH,, SRI.,THEJESH,P.,,HCGP,FOR,R1,TO,R6;, SRI.,MONISH,C.P.,,ADVOCATE,FOR,R7), , , THIS,WP(HC),IS,FILED,UNDER,ARTICLES,226,AND,227, OF,CONSTITUTION,OF,INDIA,,PRAYING,TO,ISSUE,A,WRIT,IN, THE, NATURE, OF, HABEAS, CORPUS, DIRECTING, RESPONDENT, NO.5, TO, PRODUCE, THE, MINOR, CHILDREN, PREETHI, AGED, ABOUT,10,YEARS,AND,PRINCE,AGED,ABOUT,8,YEARS,BEFORE, THIS, COURT, AND, HAND, OVER, THEIR, CUSTODY, TO, THE, PETITIONER.,, , , THIS, PETITION,, COMING, ON, FOR, ORDERS,, THIS, DAY,, JUDGMENT,WAS,DELIVERED,THEREIN,AS,UNDER:,

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL

ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL)

This writ petition is filed by the father seeking prayer to issue a writ in the nature of habeas corpus directing the respondent No.5 to produce the minor children xxxx and xxxx aged about 8 years and 10 years, respectively and handover the custody to the petitioner who is their biological father.

¶2Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned State Public Prosecutor-I for the respondent Nos.1 to 6 and Sri.Monish C.P., learned counsel for the respondent No.7.

¶3The petitioner filed this writ petition claiming to be the biological father of two minor children. It is averred that the petitioner's first wife Smt.Pushpa passed away in the year 2022 and thereafter, the petitioner, along with his

children was residing in Bengaluru and he was working as a Security Guard. It is further averred that in January 2023, the petitioner got married and was residing with his wife and two children. On 24.04.2023, his wife was found dead. Based on a complaint, the jurisdictional police registered a case in Crime No.134/2023 for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the India Penal Code, 1860, and the petitioner was arrested in the said crime. The letter at Annexure-B indicates that the minor children were admitted with the respondent Nos.4 and 5.

¶4This Court, based on the assertions made in the writ petition, issued notice to the respondents. This Court, considering the nature of the relief sought and taking note of the fact that the two minor children are in the custody of respondent Nos.4 and 5, directed to implead the Child Welfare Committee-I, Bengaluru and the District Legal Services Authority, Bengaluru. The District Legal Services Authority represented by a counsel has filed various reports before this Court, as directed, from time to time.

The reports placed in a sealed cover indicate that both the children are safe with the respective child care homes, children are pursuing their education and the respondent Nos.4 and 5 have provided necessary medical assistance. The reports on record clearly indicate the progress made by the children with regard to their health and academics. The Child Welfare Committee-I has placed the reports of both the children which also indicate the same. It is noticed that the petitioner, after being enlarged on bail, has visited the children. The learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that if the petitioner is allowed to visit the children, he is not intended to continue with this proceeding. Keeping in mind the request of the petitioner who is the biological father of the two minor children and the pendency of the criminal proceedings against the petitioner and after considering the reports filed by the Authority, we are of the considered view that the writ petition deserves to be disposed of by continuing the custody of the children with the respondent Nos.4 and 5

respectively, for some time. The respondent-Authorities shall permit the petitioner to visit the children during the working hours. The respondent-Authorities are directed to provide necessary education to the children in their custody and also provide the required health assistance till the children are in their custody. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to move the Child Welfare Committee-I for custody of the children on any changed circumstances.

¶5With the aforesaid liberty and by granting a right to the petitioner to visit the minor children, the writ petition is disposed of.

¶6We place on record the assistance rendered by Sri.Monish C.P., Amicus / representing the respondent No.7-District Legal Services Authority, Bengaluru, and also the assistance rendered by the learned SPP-I.

The Registry shall keep the reports filed in the above petition along with the file.

A copy of this order shall be forwarded to the respondent Nos.4 and for information and implementation.

Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE

Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE

RAK/RV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2

Source: High Court of Karnataka, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.