- Court
- High Court of Karnataka
- Decided
- 23 March 2026
- Bench
- K.Manmadha Rao
- Case no.
- RPFC 86/2020
Follow Karnataka High CourtFollow K.Manmadha Rao
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO.86 OF 2020 C/W REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO.107 OF 2021
IN RPFC No.86/2020 BETWEEN:
SMT. NANDINI N W/O. YESHWANTH L, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS R/AT D.NO.4, RUKMANI NILAYA, BLOCK -A, 12/B, 10TH CROSS, RANGARAJA COLONY VASU LAYOUT, RAMAKRISHNA NAGARA MYSURU. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. AMSHITH HEGDE H.S.,ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:
YESHWANTH L S/O. LAKSHMIPATHY, R/AT NO.11/12, JAYALAKSHMI LAYOUT, A NARAYANAPURA MAIN ROAD, OPP MULKATTAMMA TEMPLE, B. NARAYANAPURA, BENGALURU 560 016.
OLD ADDRESS: NO. 25/1, 8TH MAIN ROAD, DHATHATREYA NAGARA, HOSAKEREHALLI,
by VIJAYALAKSHMI B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA NC:(2026:KHC:16300( RPFC(No.(86(of(2020( C/W(RPFC(No.(107(of(2021( , ,,HC-KAR( ( ( RDBSK,3 ,STAGE,, BENGALURU-,560,085., , WORKING,AT:, GKN,AEROSPACE,, ND2 ,FLOOR,, RMZ,,TITANIUM,, 135,,HAL,,OLD,AIRPORT,ROAD,, KODIHALLI,, BENGALURU,–,560,017., ,,…RESPONDENT, (BY,SRI.,C.,PATTABHIRAMAN,,ADVOCATE), , THIS,RPFC,IS,FILED,UNDER,SECTION,19(4),OF,FAMILY, COURT,ACT,,AGAINST,THE,ORDER,DATED,21.09.2019,PASSED, IN,C.MIS.727/2017,ON,THE,FILE,OF,THE,IV,ADDL.,PRINCIPAL, FAMILY, JUDGE,, MYSURU,, PARTLY, ALLOWING, THE, PETITION, FILED,UNDER,SECTION,125,OF,Cr.P.C,FOR,MAINTENANCE., , IN(RPFC(NO.107/2021, BETWEEN:, , SRI.,YESHWANTH,L,, SON,OF,SRI.,LAKSHMIPATHY, AGED,ABOUT,37,YEARS,, R/AT,NO.11/12,,,JAYALAKSHMI,LAYOUT, 'A',NARAYANAPURA,MAIN,ROAD,, OPP:,MULKATTAMMA,TEMPLE, B.,NARAYANAPURA, BENGALURU-560,016., , OLD,ADDRESS:, THNO.25/1,,8 ,MAIN,ROAD, DHATHATREYA,NAGARA,, RDHOSAKEREHALLI,BSK,3 ,STAGE, BENGALURU-560,085., , NC:(2026:KHC:16300( RPFC(No.(86(of(2020( C/W(RPFC(No.(107(of(2021( , ,,HC-KAR( ( ( WORKING,AT:, NDGKN,AEROSPACE,,2 ,FLOOR, RMZ,TITANIUM,,135,,HAL,, OLD,AIRPORT,ROAD,,KODIHALLI, BENGALURU,-560,017., ...PETITIONER, (BY,SRI.,PATTABHIRAMAN,C.,ADVOCATE), AND:, , SMT.,NANDINI,N,, W/O.,SRI,YESHWANTH,L, AGED,ABOUT,30,YEARS,, R/AT:D.NO.4,,RUKMANI,NILAYA,, THBLOCK-A,,12/B,,10 ,CROSS,, RANGARAJA,COLONY,,VASU,LAYOUT,, RAMAKRISHNA,NAGARA,, MYSORE,-570,022., ...RESPONDENT, (BY,SRI.,AMSHITH,HEGDE,H.S.,ADVOCATE,(ABSENT), , ,,,,,,THIS,RPFC,IS,FILED,UNDER,SEC.19(4),OF,THE,FAMILY, COURT, ACT.,, 1984, AGAINST, THE, ORDER, DATED,
21.09.2019,PASSED,IN,C.MISC.NO.727/2017,ON,THE,FILE, OF, THE, IV, ADDITIONAL, PRINCIPAL, FAMILY, JUDGE,, MYSURU,,PARTLY,ALLOWING,THE,PETITION,FILED,UNDER, SEC.125,OF,CR.PC.,,FOR,MAINTENANCE., , THESE, PETITIONS,, COMING, ON, FOR, ADMISSION,, THIS, DAY,,ORDER,WAS,MADE,THEREIN,AS,UNDER:, , CORAM:, HON'BLE,DR.,JUSTICE,K.MANMADHA,RAO, (
ORAL ORDER
None appears for the petitioner-wife. Learned counsel for the respondent-husband is present.
¶2Learned counsel for the respondent files a memo along with a copy of the order dated 13.09.2025 in M.C.No.1117/2023, which was settled before the Mega Lok Adalath on the file of the II Additional Principal Family Court at Mysuru, wherein the parties have resolved their dispute on the following terms and conditions: "1. The petitioner hereby withdraw all the averments made in the petition against the respondent. Simultaneously the respondent also withdraw all the defense took by him in the course of the objection statement to the main petition.
¶2The respondent hereby agreed and covenant with the petitioner that the respondent hereby agreed to pay a sum of Rs.21,00,000/- through Demand Draft to the petitioner towards her permanent alimony.
¶3The respondent is hereby paid monthly maintenance to the petitioner till 30.08.2025 and arrears were left as balance and from
28.08.2025, the respondent need not to pay any maintenance amount or any arrears to the petitioner.
¶4The petition filed by the petitioner in RPFC No.86/2020 against the respondent and the
respondent filed RPFC No.107/2021 against the petitioner, both before Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka are hereby agreed by both of them to withdraw their above referred respective cases immediately after payment of the above referred permanent alimony.
¶5The respondent has handed over the above referred amount of Rs.21,00,000/- through demand draft No.817141 dated 30.07.2025 drawn on State Bank of India in the name of the petitioner in C.C.No.55096/2019 filed against the respondent before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Bangalore towards permanent alimony and in said regard the petitioner had deposed that with notion, the complaint was filed against the respondent and prayed for dismissal of the above referred complaint against the respondent.
¶6The petitioner and respondent further agreed and covenant that there are no other movable and immovable properties left to exchange between them.
¶7The petitioner hereby undertakes that she will not claim any maintenance or any right over any movable or immovable properties belonged to the respondent and also not to claim any sort of relief against the respondent in future i.e., from
28.08.2025.
¶8Both the petitioner and respondent hereby agreed and covenant that both will not interfere in any manner with each other in respect of their personal life in future".
¶3In view of the above agreement entered into between the parties, nothing survives in both the
petitions. Hence, the petitions are disposed of as having become infructuous.
SD/- (DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE
GSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9
Source: High Court of Karnataka, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.