VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Karnataka High Court 2025 › High Court of Karnataka

Shri. Mahadevaswamy K v. The State of Karnataka

DISPOSED
Court
High Court of Karnataka
Decided
23 September 2025
Bench
H.T. Narendra Prasadauthor
Case no.
WP 27953/2023

Follow Karnataka High CourtFollow H.T. Narendra Prasad

Judgment

NC:(2025:KHC:38351( WP(No.(27953(of(2023( ( , ,,HC-KAR( ( ( IN(THE(HIGH(COURT(OF(KARNATAKA(AT(BENGALURU(

RDDATED(THIS(THE(23 (DAY(OF(SEPTEMBER,(2025(

BEFORE( THE(HON'BLE(MR.(JUSTICE(H.T.(NARENDRA(PRASAD( WRIT(PETITION(NO.(27953(OF(2023((S-RES)( BETWEEN:(( ,

1., SHRI.,MAHADEVASWAMY,K, S/O,LATE,KRISHNAPPA, AGED,ABOUT,35,YEARS, R/AT,NO.4219/2,,6TH,CROSS, GANDHINAGAR,,MYSORE,

MYSORE,DISTRICT,570008., ,

2., SMT,SHYAMALA, S/O,LATE,SRINIVAS, AGED,ABOUT,42,YEARS, R/AT,NO.618,,KRISHNA,RAIL,MILL,ROAD, K,R,MOHALLA,,MYSORE,570008., ,

3., SMT,N,MANJULA, W/O,RAVI, AGED,ABOUT,44,YEARS, R/AT,NO.1629/2,CH,12, Digitallytisignedtiby 7TH,CROSS,ASHOKPURAM, HEMALATHA0A MYSORE,570008., Location:0HIGH ,COURTOF KARNATAKA 4., SMT,M,S,DARSHINI, D/O,LATE,SHIVANNA, AGED,ABOUT,30,YEARS, R/AT,NO.56,,2ND,CROSS, VISHVESHWARA,COLONY, VISHVESHWARA,NAGAR,,MYSORE., ,

5., SHRI,S,MALLIKARJUNA, S/O,LATE,M,B,MANJULA, AGED,ABOUT,36,YEARS, R/AT,NO.58/A,,2ND,CROSS, NYACHANAHALLI,PALYA, MYSORE,570008., NC:(2025:KHC:38351( WP(No.(27953(of(2023( ( , ,,HC-KAR( ( ( ,

6., SHRI.,SHIVANAGARAJU, S/O,SHIVAMMA, AGED,ABOUT,,44,YEARS, R/AT,GSF,COLONY, AT,POST,T,NARSIPURA, MYSORE,DISTRICT,,-,570008., ,

7., SHRI,,S,MANU, S/O,SHIVANNA,M, AGED,ABOUT,,35,YEARS, R/AT,NO,,KEMPANAPURA,HOSUR, MANUGANA,HALLI,POST, BILIKERE,,HOBLI,,MYSORE., ,

8., SHRI,G,GANESH, S/O,,LATE,GOPAL,G, AGED,ABOUT,,,39,YEARS, NO,,2676,,2ND,CROSS, MEDARKODI,,KR,,MOHALLA,, MYSORE,–,570008., ,

9., SHRI,RAJANIKANTH, AGED,ABOUT,,,45,YEARS, R/AT,NO,,960,,CH,85, S/O,LATE,NINGAYYA, 9TH,CROSS,,CH,85,,9TH,CROSS, ASHOKPURAM,,MYSORE,,-,570008., ,

10., SHRI,R,SRINIVASA, S/O,LATE,RAVINDRA, AGED,ABOUT,,,30,YEARS, R/AT,NO,,897/B,,10TH,CROSS, MAHADEVPURA,MYSORE,,-,576008., ,

11., SRI,M,HARSHA, S/O,LATE,G,MAHADEVAIAH, AGED,ABOUT,,,40,YEARS, R/AT,NO,,1029,LIG,,1ST,BLOCK, 11TH,CROSS,,5TH,MAIN, 6TH,PHASE,,SHARADADEVI,NAGAR,, , MYSORE,,-,570022., , NC:(2025:KHC:38351( WP(No.(27953(of(2023( ( , ,,HC-KAR( ( (

12., SRI,V,KRISHNAPURTHY, AGED,ABOUT,,,35,YEARS, S/O,LATE,VENKATARAMANAYYA,, R/AT,NO,,1629/1,,CH,12,,7TH,CROSS, ASHOKPURAM,,MYSORE,,-,570008., ,

13., SRI,BASAVARAJAIAH, S/O,LATE,,SOMARAJU, AGED,,ABOUT,,,40,YEARS, R/AT,NO,26,,HIG,2,,GROUP,3,, KHB,COLONY,,HOCHAGALLI, MYSORE,,-,570002., ,

14., SMT,M,PRIYA, AGED,ABOUT,,30,YEARS, D/O,LATE,NAGAMMA, R/AT,,4,,1ST,MAIN,,2ND,CROSS,, B,M,SHRINAGAR, MYSORE,,-,570007., ,

15., SRI,L,SHANKAR, S/O,LATE,K,LINGAIAH, AGED,ABOUT,,,40,YEARS, R/AT,NO,,1816,,9TH,CROSS, ASHOKPURAM, MYSORE,,-,570008., ,

16., SRI,S,NAGESH, S/O,LATE,J,SIDDAIAH, AGED,ABOUT,,,29,YEARS, R/ATNO,,1954,,12TH,CROSS,, ASHOKPURAM,MYSORE,–,570008., ,

17., SRI,B,KANTHKUMAR, S/O,LATE,BANASHANKARAIAH, AGED,ABOUT,,37,YEARS, R/AT,NO,564,,R,S,NAIDU,NAGAR, NEAR,,BUS,STOP,2ND,STAGE, KESARE,MYSORE,–,570002., ,

18., SRI,,CHANDRASHEKHAR, S/O,LATE,RAMANNA, AGED,,ABOUT,,,38,YEARS,, R/AT,NO,,1904,,2ND,MAIN, NC:(2025:KHC:38351( WP(No.(27953(of(2023( ( , ,,HC-KAR( ( ( 13TH,CROSS,,ASHOKPURAM, MYSORE,,-,570008., …PETITIONERS, (BY,SRI.,VIJAYA,KUMAR.,,ADVOCATE), AND:( (

1., THE,STATE,OF,KARNATAKA, REP.,BY,ITS,PRINCIPAL,SECRETARY, COMMERCE,AND,INDUSTRIES,DEPARTMENT, VIKASA,SOUDHA,,BANGALORE,560001., ,

2., THE,STATE,OF,KARNATAKA, REP,BY,ITS,PRINCIPAL,SECRETARY, HORTICULTURE,AND,SILK,DEVELOPMENT, VIKAS,SOUDHA,,BANGALORE,560001., ,

3., THE,STATE,OF,KARNATAKA, REP,BY,ITS,ADDITIONAL,CHIEF,SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT,OF,PUBLIC,ENTERPRISES, 7TH,FLOOR,,MS,BUILDING, BANGALORE,560001., ,

4., THE,KARNATAKA,SILK,INDUSTRIES,CORPORATION, REP,BY,ITS,MANAGING,DIRECTOR, 3RD,AND,4TH,FLOOR,UTILITY,BUILDING, MG,ROAD,,BANGALORE,560001., ,

5., THE,GENERAL,MANAGER, KARNATAKA,SILK,INDUSTRIES,CORPORATION,, SILK,WEAVING,FACTORY, MANADAWADI,ROAD, MYSORE,570008.,

6., THE,GENERAL,MANAGER, KARNATAKA,SILK,INDUSTRIES,, CORPORATION,SILK,WEAVING,FACTORY, T,NARASIPURA,,MYSORE,DISTRICT., …RESPONDENTS, (BY,SRI.,VIKAS,R,,AGA,FOR,R1,TO,R3:, SRI,T,P,MUTHANNA,,ADVOCATE,FOR,R4,TO,R6), , THIS,WRIT,PETITION,IS,FILED,UNDER,ARTICLE,226,OF,THE, CONSTITUTION, OF, INDIA, PRAYING, TO, CALL, FOR, RECORDS, RELATING, TO, ISSUE, OF, THE, IMPUGNED, ORDERS, BEARING, NO.,

KSIC/PER/MA AND E/RE AA SAM/11153/2022/2023-24 / 366 DATED 28/06/2023 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONERS BY THE R4 (VIDE ANNEXURE-V AND V17 SERIES) AND AFTER PERUSAL SET ASIDE THE SAME AND ETC.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

ORAL ORDER This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following reliefs: "(i) To call for records relating to issue of the impugned orders bearing No. KSIC/PER/Ma & E/Re Aa Sam/11153/2022/2023-24/366 dated

28.06.2023 issued to the petitioners by the 4th respondent (vide Annexure V to V17 series) and after perusal set aside the same.

(ii) To issue a writ of certiorari or an order or a direction and quash the impugned order bearing No.Tho.E.59.R3.Wu.Ni 2016 dated 26.07.2017 of the 2nd respondent vide Annexure-F, of the 2nd respondent, and the impugned Circular bearing No.KSIC/OER/ECG/2017-28/779 dated 19.08.2017 issued by the 3rd respondent vide Annexure-G, of the 4th respondent, in so far as it relates to non consideration of pending applications for appointment on compassionate grounds.

(iii) And to direct the 4th respondent to amend the Rules by including the clause 9 as "Transitional Provision" with regard to pending applications seeking appointment on compassionate grounds which are submitted before the framing of the Rules 2016 and consider the pending applications seeking appointment on compassionate grounds.

(iv) To direct the respondents 4 and 5 to consider the applications of the petitioners seeking appointment on compassionate grounds vide Annexure-H to H8 series and appoint them to any of Group-C or D post considering qualification possessed by them as on the date of the applications."

¶2The petitioners claim to be legal representatives of the deceased employees of respondent – Karnataka Silk Industries Corporation (for short, "the Corporation"). They submitted applications (Annexure–H series) seeking appointment on compassionate grounds. However, by the impugned endorsements dated 28.06.2023 (Annexure–V series), their applications were rejected on the ground that, as on

the date of filing, there were no Rules governing compassionate appointments. Aggrieved by the said endorsements, the petitioners are before this Court.

¶3Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that Karnataka Silk Industries Corporation (Appointment on Compassionate Grounds) Rules/ Regulations, 2016 ("Regulations–2016") were framed in 2016 (Annexure–E). Under Rule 2, it is specifically provided that all applications pending as on the date the Regulations came into force shall be considered in accordance with Government directions. Despite such Government directions, Corporation issued impugned endorsements contrary to the Regulations. Therefore, he prayed that the writ petition be allowed.

¶4Per contra, Sri T.P. Muthanna, learned counsel appearing for the Corporation, contended as follows:

(i) The Regulations were framed in 2016. The applications of the petitioners, who are dependents of

deceased employees, were filed before the Regulations came into force. Since no Rules or Regulations existed either on the date of death of the employees or on the date of application, their request for compassionate appointment cannot be considered. As per Government directions dated 26.04.2022 (Annexure–R), the applications were considered and rejected.

(ii) Secondly, as the Corporation is under severe financial constraints, the petitioners' cases cannot be considered for compassionate appointments.

¶5Learned AGA appearing for the State submitted as follows:

(i) Proviso to Rule 2 of the Regulations–2016 carves out an exception to main Rule, permitting consideration of all applications that were pending as on the date the Regulations came into force, in terms of Government directions.

(ii) Pursuant to directions of this Court, the Under Secretary to Government, Department of Horticulture and Sericulture, has filed an affidavit stating that the Corporation can consider the petitioners' applications for compassionate appointment. Hence, he sought dismissal of the writ petition.

¶6Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the petition papers.

¶7The fourth respondent – Karnataka Silk Industries Corporation was established on 10.04.1980 as a State Government Undertaking registered under the Companies Act. The petitioners, being legal representatives of deceased employees, filed applications for compassionate appointment (Annexure–H series). Meanwhile, Corporation, having been declared a sick unit, was referred to BIFR due to financial constraints.

¶8Until 2016, there were no Rules governing compassionate appointments in the Corporation. The

Regulations came into force in 2016. Rule 2 contains an exception, which reads as follows: "These Rules may be called the Karnataka Silk Industries Corporation (Appointment on Compassionate Grounds) Rules/Regulations–2016. These Rules shall come into force after their approval by the Board and the State Government on such date as may be notified by the Corporation in this regard. However, the pending applications of dependents of deceased employees (who died while in service) shall be considered based on the directions received from the Government."

¶9A plain reading of the above provision makes it clear that pending applications of dependents of deceased employees must be considered in accordance with Government directions. Although no such Rules existed prior to 2016, Rule 2 permits consideration of pending applications based on Government directions.

¶10The Corporation, however, rejected petitioners' applications on ground that Regulations came into effect on 19.08.2017. It is the

Corporation's case that the Government Order dated

26.04.2022 merely directed consideration of applications, and upon such consideration, the applications were rejected.

¶11Subsequently, the State filed an affidavit of the Under Secretary, Department of Horticulture and Sericulture, dated 23.09.2025, clarifying the position. The relevant paragraph is extracted below: "3. I submit that this affidavit is being filed pursuant to the order of this Hon'ble Court dated

19.08.2025, to clarify whether any directions were issued by the State Government in connection with pending applications for compassionate appointment of dependents of deceased employees of the Karnataka Silk Industries Corporation (KSIC), as required under Rule 2 of the Regulations–2016."

¶12After obtaining the opinion of the Department of Public Enterprises vide Note No. Sa U Ni.51 ARU 2021, dated

11.01.2022, Principal Secretary of Horticulture and Sericulture Department addressed a letter

dated 26.04.2022 (Annexure–R) to the Managing Director, KSIC, stating that since the dependents of the deceased employees have been working on contract basis in KSIC, pending consideration of their applications for compassionate appointment, it would be improper from a humanitarian point of view not to consider their cases. Therefore, it was directed that their cases be placed before the Board of Directors for consideration.

¶13In view of the aforesaid direction, the Board of Directors is required to consider the applications of such dependents in accordance with the Regulations.

¶14Thus, in light of Rule 2 and the clarification issued by the Government, it is evident that the Corporation is bound to consider petitioners' applications for compassionate appointment.

¶15Accordingly, the following order is passed:

(i) The writ petition is disposed of.

(ii) The impugned endorsements dated 28.06.2023 (Annexure–V series) are quashed.

(iii) The respondent–Corporation is directed to consider the petitioners' applications for compassionate appointment, taking into account: • the affidavit filed by the Under Secretary, Department of Horticulture and Sericulture, and • Rule 2 of the Regulations–2016, as expeditiously as possible, and in any event, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE

CM LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 53

Source: High Court of Karnataka, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.