Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967
Section 13: Punishment for unlawful activities
(1) Whoever—
(a) takes part in or commits, or
(b) advocates, abets, advises or incites the commission of, any unlawful activity, shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years and shall also be liable to fine.
(2) Whoever, in any way, assists any unlawful activity of any association, declared unlawful under section 3, after the notification by which it has been so declared has become effective under sub-section (3) of that section, shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years, or with fine, or with both.
(3) Nothing in this section shall apply to any treaty, agreement or convention entered into between the Government of India and the Government of any other country or to any negotiations therefor carried on by any person authorised in this behalf by the Government of India.
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 15 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 13
-
Athar Parwez v. Union of India
Appellant alleged to be an active member of the Popular Front of India (PFI) involved in planning to cause disturbance during the proposed visit of Prime Minister of India to Patna in 2022. Chargesheet filed against the…
-
Fuleshwar Gope v. Union of India & Ors.
Issue arose as to whether the validity of the Sanction Order can be challenged at any stage; whether violation of s.45(2) of the UAPA r/w rr.3 and 4 of the 2008 Rules, if any, vitiates the proceedings, whether violation…
-
Jalaluddin Khan v. Union of India
Factors to be taken into consideration, under Section 43D(5) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, while deciding Bail Applications for offences falling under Chapters IV and VI of the Act.
-
Agency Chennai Branch v. Barakathullah etc.
The respondents-accused were arrested for the alleged offences under section 120(b), 153(A), 153(AA) of IPC and Section 13, 17, 18, 18(B), 38 and 39 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1957. The High Court…
-
Prabir Purkayastha v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Whether the arrest and subsequent remand of the accused-appellant was vitiated as the copy of the remand application was not provided to him or his counsel before passing of the order of remand thus, not informing him…
-
State of Karnataka v. T. Naseer @ Nasir @ Thandiantavida
The High Court rejected the applications filed by the prosecution u/s. 311 of the Cr.P.C., seeking recall of PW-189 and to permit the prosecution to produce the report and the certificate u/s. 65B of the Evidence Act,…
- Mohammad Irfan v. State of Karnataka
- Jahir Hak v. The State of Rajasthan
- Waheed-Ur-Rehman Parra v. Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir
- Thwaha Fasal v. Union of India
- Naser Bin Abu Bakr Yafai v. The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
- Gautam Navlakha v. National Investigation Agency
- Union of India v. K. A. Najeeb
- Bikramjit Singh v. The State of Punjab
- Raja @ Ayyappan v. State of Tamil Nadu
- National Investigation Agency v. Zahoor Ahmad Shah Watali
- Romila Thapar and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
- State of Maharashtra v. Kamal Ahmed Mohammed Vakil Ansari & Ors.
- Yumman Ongbi Lembi Leima v. State of Manipur & Ors.
- Mustaq Ahmed Mohammed Isak and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra
- State of Maharashtra Etc. v. Dhanendra Shriram Bhurle Etc.
- R.K. Krishna Kumar v. State of Assam and Ors.
- State of Punjab v. Jagdev Singh Talwandi
- Sapmawia v. Deputy Commissioner. Aijal