Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967
Section 10: Penalty for being member of an unlawful association, etc
Where an association is declared unlawful by a notification issued under section 3 which has become effective under sub-section (3) of that section,—
(a) a person, who—
(i) is and continues to be a member of such association; or
(ii) takes part in meetings of such association; or
(iii) contributes to, or receives or solicits any contribution for the purpose of, such association; or
(iv) in any way assists the operations of such association,
shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, and shall also be liable to fine; and
(b) a person, who is or continues to be a member of such association, or voluntarily does an act aiding or promoting in any manner the objects of such association and in either case is in possession of any unlicensed firearms, ammunition, explosive or other instrument or substance capable of causing mass destruction and commits any act resulting in loss of human life or grievous injury to any person or causes significant damage to any property,—
(i) and if such act has resulted in the death of any person, shall be punishable with death or imprisonment for life, and shall also be liable to fine;
(ii) in any other case, shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than five years but which may extend to imprisonment for life, and shall also be liable to fine.]
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 15 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 10
- Mohammad Haneef Mohammad Ishaque v. State of NCT Delhi Through Acp South East
- Ammar Abdul Rahiman v. National Investigation Agency
- Mansoor Asghar Peerbhoy v. State
- Saquib Nisar v. State
-
State of Karnataka v. T. Naseer @ Nasir @ Thandiantavida
The High Court rejected the applications filed by the prosecution u/s. 311 of the Cr.P.C., seeking recall of PW-189 and to permit the prosecution to produce the report and the certificate u/s. 65B of the Evidence Act,…
- Alemla Jamir v. Nia
- Arup Bhuyan v. State of Assam & Anr.
- Mohammad Irfan v. State of Karnataka
- Jahir Hak v. The State of Rajasthan
- Union of India v. K. A. Najeeb
- State of Maharashtra v. Kamal Ahmed Mohammed Vakil Ansari & Ors.
- Sri Indra Das v. State of Assam
- Mustaq Ahmed Mohammed Isak and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra
- State of Maharashtra Etc. v. Dhanendra Shriram Bhurle Etc.
- R.K. Krishna Kumar v. State of Assam and Ors.
- Sapmawia v. Deputy Commissioner. Aijal