Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 · Chapter III: Offences and Penalties
Section 7: Offence relating to public servant being bribed
Any public servant who,—
(a) obtains or accepts or attempts to obtain from any person, an undue advantage, with the intention to perform or cause performance of public duty improperly or dishonestly or to forbear or cause forbearance to perform such duty either by himself or by another public servant; or
(b) obtains or accepts or attempts to obtain, an undue advantage from any person as a reward for the improper or dishonest performance of a public duty or for forbearing to perform such duty either by himself or another public servant; or
(c) performs or induces another public servant to perform improperly or dishonestly a public duty or to forbear performance of such duty in anticipation of or in consequence of accepting an undue advantage from any person,
shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than three years but which may extend to seven years and shall also be liable to fine.
Explanation 1.—For the purpose of this section, the obtaining, accepting, or the attempting to obtain an undue advantage shall itself constitute an offence even if the performance of a public duty by public servant, is not or has not been improper.
Illustration.—A public servant, 'S' asks a person, 'P' to give him an amount of five thousand rupees to process his routine ration card application on time. 'S' is guilty of an offence under this section.
Explanation 2.—For the purpose of this section,—
(i) the expressions "obtains" or "accepts" or "attempts to obtain" shall cover cases where a person being a public servant, obtains or "accepts" or attempts to obtain, any undue advantage for himself or for another person, by abusing his position as a public servant or by using his personal influence over another public servant; or by any other corrupt or illegal means;
(ii) it shall be immaterial whether such person being a public servant obtains or accepts, or attempts to obtain the undue advantage directly or through a third party.
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 14 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 7
-
IN RE: MEPUNG TADAR BAGE, MEMBER, ARUNACHAL PRADESH PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION versus
Leakage of question paper of Assistant Engineer (Civil) Mains Examination conducted by the Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission (APPSC), on 26th and 27th August, 2022, led to the present reference by the Hon’ble…
-
K. Pounammal v. State Represented by Inspector of Police
Issue arose as regards the reduction of sentence awarded to the inspector convicted and sentenced u/ss.7 and 13(2) rw s.13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for demanding and accepting a bribe from a…
-
Mini v. CBI/SPE Cochin
This appeal is by widow of the deceased convict against the judgment and order of the High Court whereby conviction of her husband, u/ss.7, 13(1)(d) r/w s.13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, has been upheld.
-
A. Karunanithi v. The State Represented by Inspector of Police
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court upholding conviction and sentence of the appellants u/ss.13 and 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for demand and acceptance of…
-
M Sambasiva Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
Whether the High Court erred in convicting the appellant-accused no.1 u/s.120B, IPC and ss.7, 13(2) r/w s.13(1)(d), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 by reversing the finding of acquittal of the Trial Court.
-
Kasireddy Upender Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors.
Whether the arrest of the appellant’s son was per se illegal for want of supply of appropriate and meaningful grounds of arrest, as alleged.
-
State of Lokayuktha Police, Davanagere v. C B Nagaraj
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court setting aside the order of conviction of the respondent u/ss.7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for the demand of…
-
P Krishna Mohan Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
Whether the statement of an accused u/s.161, Cr.P.C implicating co-accused can be looked into qua such co-accused at the stage of anticipatory bail or regular bail; whether the High Court exercised its discretion in a…
-
Paritala Sudhakar v. State of Telangana
The appellant was convicted for the offence punishable u/s.7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and also for the offence punishable u/s.13(1)(d) r/w. s.13(2) of the Act by the trial Court. The High Court affirmed…
-
Aman Bhatia v. State (GNCT of Delhi)
Issue arose whether the High Court was right in holding that a licensed stamp vendor falls within the ambit of a public servant for the purposes of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; and whether the conviction of the…
-
Dashrath v. The State of Maharashtra
The conviction of the appellant as well as the sentence imposed on him u/ss.7 and 13(1)(d) r/w. s.13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is questioned.
-
Pradeep Nirankarnath Sharma v. Directorate of Enforcement & Anr.
The High Court dismissed the appellant’s criminal revision application and refused to the quash the order of the Trial Court rejecting the appellant’s discharge application in a case for offences under the Prevention of…
-
Devinder Kumar Bansal v. The State of Punjab
Issue arose whether the High Court justified in denying anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with FIR registered against the petitioner for the offence punishable u/s.7 of the 1988 Act and s.61(2) of the…
-
State of Rajasthan v. Surendra Singh Rathore
Issue arose as to whether the registration of the subsequent FIR is legally permissible and whether the High Court was correct in exercising its inherent powers in quashing the same.
-
The State of Punjab v. Hari Kesh
Whether the High Court was justified in quashing the Sanction Order and setting aside the proceedings arising therefrom, thereby allowing the petition filed by the accused.
-
The State, Central Bureau of Investigation v. A. Satish Kumar & Ors.
Merely because a Central Government employee works within the territory of a particular State, whether the CBI requires consent from the concerned State Government to register an FIR against such Central Government…
-
Arvind Kejriwal v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The instant appeals are directed against the judgments and orders dated 05.08.2024 passed by the High Court, dismissing the appellant’s challenge to his arrest being illegal as well as his application for the grant of…
-
Mahendra Kumar Sonker v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
Whether the conviction of the appellant under s.353 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) can be sustained without proving assault and use of criminal force.
-
Manish Sisodia v. Directorate of Enforcement
Appellant was incarcerated for around 17 months, trial yet to commence. Bail denied. Whether the trial court and the High Court correctly considered the observations made by this Court with regard to right to speedy…
-
Arvind Kejriwal v. Directorate of Enforcement
Validity of arrest of the appellant under Section 19 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002; scope and ambit of the Courts to examine the legality of the arrest under Section 19; whether the Court while…
-
Mir Mustafa Ali Hasmi v. The State of A.P.
The question arose whether the prosecution was able to prove beyond all manner of doubt the fact that the appellant demanded and accepted bribe from the complainant; and whether the courts below were justified in…
-
The State of Punjab v. Partap Singh Verka
Correctness of the order passed by the High Court setting aside the order of the trial court which had summoned respondent u/s 319 CrPC to face the trial for the offences u/s. 7/13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption…
-
Arvind Kejriwal v. Directorate of Enforcement
Whether the Appellant is entitled to grant of interim bail/release during the pendency of the Appeal challenging his arrest by the Directorate of Enforcement, on account of an intervening factor i.e. 18th Lok Sabha…
-
Sita Soren v. Union of India
Instant Reference pertains to reconsideration of the correctness of the view of the majority judgment in *PV Narasimha Rao’s case granting immunity from prosecution to a member of the legislature who has allegedly…
-
Gurdev Singh Bhalla v. State of Punjab & Ors
Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the Revision filed by the appellant against the order of the Special Judge allowing the application u/s. 319 CrPC summoning the appellant along with three other…
- Bhisham Lal Verma v. State of Uttar Pradesh
-
Pankaj Bansal v. Union of India & Ors.
Whether the arrest of the appellants u/s. 19 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 was valid; whether there was proper compliance with s.19(1) of the Act of 2002 and as to whether the Vacation Judge/Additional…
- CBI v. R.R. Kishore
- Y. Balaji v. Karthik Desari & Anr. Etc.
- Jitendra Kumar Rode v. Union of India
- Central Bureau of Investigation v. Santosh
- Soundarajan v. State Rep. by the Insp. of Police
- Seemant Kumar Singh v. Mahesh Ps & Ors.
- Neeraj Dutta v. State (Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi)
- Directorate of Enforcement v. Padmanabhan Kishore
- Union of India & Ors. v. Major R. Metri No. 08585N
- Rajesh Gupta v. State Through Central Bureau of Investigation
- Abhay Jain v. The High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan and Anr
- The State of Kerala v. K. Ajith & Ors.
- State of Rajasthan v. Ashok Kumar Kashyap
- N. Vijayakumar v. State of Tamil Nadu
- Director General of Police, Railway Protection Force and Ors. v. Rajendra Kumar Dubey
- State of Gujarat v. Mansukhbhai Kanjibhai Shah
- Vinod Kumar Garg v. State (Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi)
- Mrs. Neeraj Dutta v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
- State of Gujarat v. Navinbhai Chandrakant Joshi (Miscellaneous Application No. 2597 of 2018)
- Dashrath Singh Chauhan v. Central Bureau of Investigation
- The State of Gujarat v. Navinbhai Chandrakant Joshi Etc.
- Manju Surana v. Sunil Arora & Ors.
- Lok Prahari, Through Its General Secretary S. N. Shukla v. Union of India & Others Writ Petition (C) No. 784 of 2015 February 16, 2018
- Mukhtiar Singh (Since Deceased) Through His L.R. v. State of Punjab
- Mukhtiar Singh v. State of Punjab
- C.B.I. Bank Securities & Fraud Cell v. Ramesh Gelli & Ors.
- V. Sejappa v. The State by Police Inspector Lokayukta, Chitradurga
- Central Bureau of Investigation, Bank Securities & Fraud Cell v. Ramesh Gelli and Others
- K.P. Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi
- Indra Vijay Alok v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- K.L. Bakolia v. State Through Director, C.B.L~"V
- State of Andhra Pradesh v. P. Venkateshwarlu
- D. Velayutham v. State Rep. by Inspector of Police, Salem Town, Chennai
- Vinod Kumar v. State of Punjab
- Somabhai Gopalbhai Patel v. State of Gujarat
- Satvir Singh v. State of Delhi Through CBI
- Bairam Muralidhar v. State of Andhra Pradesh
- Dr. Subramanian Swamy v. Director, Centeral Bureau of Investigation & Anr.
- B. Jayaraj v. State of A.P.
- P.C. Mishra v. State (C.B.I.) & Anr.
- Phula Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh
- State Through CBI New Delhi v. Jitender Kumar Singh
- Manohar Lal Sharma v. The Principal Secretary and Ors.
- State of Maharashtra Through C.B.I. v. Mahesh G. Jain
- Balbir Singh Bedi v. State of Punjab and Ors.
- Rakesh Kapoor v. State of Himachal Pradesh
- State of N.C.T. of Delhi v. Ajay Kumar Tyagi
- Narendra Champaklal Trivedi v. State of Gujarat
- Vasanti Dubey v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- Kanwarjit Singh Kakkar v. State of Punjab and Anr.
- Keshav Dutt v. State of Haryana
- The State Rep. by Cbi, Hyderabad v. G. Prem Raj
- Ranvir Singh v. State of Haryana & Anr.
- State of Punjab & Anr. v. Mohammed Iqbal Bhatti
- State of Maharashtra v. Dnyaneshwar Laxman Rao Wankhede
- A. Subair v. State of Kerala
- Jamiruddin Ansari v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.
- Krishna Ram v. State of Rajasthan
- C.M. Girish Babu v. C.B.I. Cochin, High Court of Kerala
- Shiv Kumar v. State of N.C.T. of Delhi
- State of Haryana v. Surjit Singh
- State of Punjab v. Karnail Singh
- Bechaarbhai S. Prajapati v. State of Gujarat
- K. Subba Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh
- State of Punjab v. Deepak Mattu
- State, Cbi, Hyderabad v. Edwin Devasahayam
- State of Madhya Pradesh v. Shambhu Dayal Nagar
- The State Rep. by Inspector of Police, Pudukottai, Tamilnadu v. A. Parthiban
- State of Karnataka Through CBI v. C. Nagarajaswamy
- State of Goa v. Babu Thomas
- State of West Bengal v. Kailash Chandra Pandey
- State by Police Inspector v. T. Venkatesh Murthy
- State of Andhra Pradesh v. R. Jeevaratnam