- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Decided
- 2 May 2016
- Bench
- Ranjan Gogoi, Prafulla C. Pant
- Case no.
- Crl. MP Nos. 6416-6420 of 2016
- Result
- Petitions allowed.
Headnote
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - s.13(2) rlw. s.13(l){d) - Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - s.46A - Separate Judgments of Hon 'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi, and Hon 'hie Mr. Justice Prafulla C. Pant reported in [2016] 1 SCR 762 - Para 25 of the Judgment of Hon 'ble Mr. Justice Prafulla C. Pant - Modification made in the said para.
Headnote as published in the Digital Supreme Court Reports by the Supreme Court of India. Paragraph references point to the judgment below.
Judgment
ORDER
Jn paragraph 25 of the Judgment dated 23.02.2016 (by Mr. Prafulla C. Pant, J.) instead of words "Section 46 of Banking Regulation Act, 1949" the words "Section 46A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949" shall be substituted and in th~ last sentence of the paragraph instead of "Section 7 to 13 of the P.C. Act, 1988", the words "Section 7 to 12 of the P.C. Act, 1988", shall be substituted.
CRL.M.P. Nos. 6416-6420 of2016 are accordingly allowed.
Case details
Arising from
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Cr! MP Nos. 6416-
6420 of2016 in Criminal Appeal Nos. I 077-1081 of2013.
From the Judgment and Order dated 13.07.2009 of the High Court of Judicature at Mumbai in Criminal Revision Application No. 131 of 2007 with Criminal Writ Petition No. 2400 of2008 to 2403 of2008.
Appearances
Tushar Mehta, ASG, Rana Mukherjee, Sr. Adv., Ms. Ranjana Narayan, T. A. Khan, M.A. Meroria, Arvind Kumar Sharma, Advs. for the Appellant.
Mohan Parasaran, Sr. Adv., G. Umapathy, Rakesh K. Sharma, S. Ramasubramanian, Ranjit B. Raut, Ms. Bina Gupta, Abay A. Jena, Mis Khaitan & Co., Ad vs. for the Respondents.
Source: Supreme Court of India, Digital Supreme Court Reports, via the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open dataset (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.