Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 · Chapter XVII: Of Penalties in Case of Dishonour of Certain Cheques for Insufficiency of Funds in the Accounts
Section 141: Offences by companies
(1) If the person committing an offence under section 138 is a company, every person who, at the time the offence was committed, was in charge of, and was responsible to, the company for the conduct of the business of the company, as well as the company, shall be deemed to be guilty of the offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly:
Provided that nothing contained in this sub-section shall render any person liable to punishment if he proves that the offence was committed without his knowledge, or that he had exercised all due diligence to prevent the commission of such offence:
[Provided further that where a person is nominated as a Director of a company by virtue of his holding any office or employment in the Central Government or State Government or a financial corporation owned or controlled by the Central Government or the State Government, as the case may be, he shall not be liable for prosecution under this Chapter.]
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), where any offence under this Act has been committed by a company and it is proved that the offence has been committed with the consent or connivance of, or is attributable to, any neglect on the part of, any director, manager, secretary or other officer of the company, such director, manager, secretary or other officer shall also be deemed to be guilty of that offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly.
Explanation.— For the purposes of this section, —
(a) "company" means any body corporate and includes a firm or other association of individuals; and
(b) "director", in relation to a firm, means a partner in the firm.
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 15 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 141
-
Sankar Padam Thapa v. Vijaykumar Dineshchandra Agarwal
Whether in the absence of a Trust being made an accused in a complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, when a Cheque has been issued on behalf of a Trust, the said complaint would be maintainable against the…
-
Kaveri Plastics v. Mahdoom Bawa Bahrudeen Noorul
When the amount mentioned and demanded in the notice sent under Proviso (b) to s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, to the payee or the holder in due course of the cheque, is different from the amount for…
-
HDFC Bank Limited v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Issue arose whether the High Court was justified in quashing the complaint insofar as respondent no.2-director of the company on the ground that necessary averments to invoke the vicarious liability against the…
-
S.C. Garg v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
The appellant’s petition u/s.482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 seeking quashment of Criminal Case No. 7489 of 2002 pending on the file of Chief Judicial Magistrate for offences u/s.420 of the Penal Code, 1860 was…
-
Ashok Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
Whether the High Court erred in setting aside the concurrent findings of guilt and the consequent conviction of the respondent no.2-accused under Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
-
Rakesh Bhanot v. M/s. Gurdas Agro Pvt. Ltd.
Issue arose whether the proceedings initiated against the appellants u/s.138 rw s.141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act should be stayed in view of the interim moratorium u/s.96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code,…
-
K.S. Mehta v. M/s Morgan Securities and Credits Pvt. Ltd.
Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the petitions filed under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of criminal proceedings.
-
Kamalkishor Shrigopal Taparia v. India Ener-Gen Private Limited & Anr.
Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the petitions filed by the Appellant-an independent non-executive director under Section 482, CrPC seeking quashing of criminal proceedings initiated against him under…
-
Bijoy Kumar Moni v. Paresh Manna & Anr.
The dishonoured cheque in question was signed by respondent-accused, in his capacity as Director and Authorised Signatory of the Company Shilabati Hospital Pvt. Ltd., on the account maintained by the Company with…
-
Bijay Agarwal v. M/s Medilines
Whether the signatory of a cheque authorized by the Company is a drawer and whether such a signatory could be directed to deposit any sum out of the fine or compensation awarded by the trial Court u/s.148 of the…
-
Fuleshwar Gope v. Union of India & Ors.
Issue arose as to whether the validity of the Sanction Order can be challenged at any stage; whether violation of s.45(2) of the UAPA r/w rr.3 and 4 of the 2008 Rules, if any, vitiates the proceedings, whether violation…
-
National Housing Bank v. Bherudan Dugar Housing Finance Ltd. & Ors. Etc.
On a complaint filed u/s. 200 CrPC, wherein the Magistrate took cognizance of the complaint for the offence u/s. 29A (i) read with s. 50 and punishable u/s. 49 (2A) of the 1987 Act against the first respondent-company,…
-
Shri Gurudatta Sugars Marketing Pvt. Ltd. v. Prithviraj Sayajirao Deshmukh & Ors.
Whether the signatory of the cheque, authorized by the “Company”, is the “drawer” and whether such signatory could be directed to pay interim compensation in terms of section 143-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act,…
-
Susela Padmavathy Amma v. M/S Bharti Airtel Limited
The High Court rejected the prayer for quashing of criminal complaints qua the appellant in connection with the offence punishable u/s. 138 r/w. s.142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
-
Siby Thomas v. M/S. Somany Ceramics Ltd.
In the impugned order, the High Court declined to quash the complaint u/s.138 r/w. s.141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 qua the appellant-accused no.4 in exercise of the power u/s. 482 of the Cr.P.C.
- Ajay Kumar Radheyshyam Goenka v. Tourism
- Pawan Kumar Goel v. State of U. P. & Another
- Lalankumar Singh & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra
- S. P. Mani and Mohan Dairy v. Dr.Snehalatha Elangovan
- Sunita Palita & Others v. M/S Panchami Stone Quarry
- Dilip Hariramani v. Bank of Baroda
- Sunil Todi & Ors. v. State of Gujarat & Anr.
- Pradeep S. Wodeyar v. The State of Karnataka
- Dayle De’Souza v. Government of India Through Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner (C) and Another
- Ravindranatha Bajpe v. Mangalore Special Economic Zone Ltd. & Others Etc.
- Anjali Rathi and Others v. Today Homes & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and Others
- Prakash Gupta v. Securities and Exchange Board of India
- Alka Khandu Avhad v. Amar Syamprasad Mishra & Anr.
- P. Mohanraj & Ors. v. M/S. Shah Brothers Ispat Pvt. Ltd.
- Hindustan Unilever Limited v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
- Shailendra Swarup v. The Deputy Director, Enforcement Directorate
- Karnataka State Pollution Control v. B. Heera Naik & Ors. Etc.
- G. Ramesh v. Kanike Harish Kumar Ujwal & Anr.
- Chintalapati Srinivasa Raju v. Securities and Exchange Board of India
- Satyendra Kumar Mehra @ Satendera Kumar Mehra v. The State of Jharkhand
- Sharat Babu Digumarti v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
- Securities and Exchange Board of India v. Gaurav Varshney & Anr.
- Standard Chartered Bank v. State of Maharashtra and Others Etc.
- Mainuddin Abdul Sattar Shaikh v. Vijay D. Salvi
- Sunil Bharti Mittal v. Central Bureau of Investigation
- Pooja Ravinder Devidasani v. State of Maharashtra&Anr.
- Gunmala Sales Private Ltd. v. Anu Mehta & Ors.
- Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
- Anil Gupta v. Star India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr
- G.N. Verma v. State of Jharkhand & Anr.
- Sushil Ansal v. State Through CBI
- A.K. Singhania v. Gujarat State Fertilizer Co. Ltd. & Anr.
- Ajoy Acharya v. State Bureau of Inv. Against Eco. Offence
- M/S. Escorts Limited v. Rama Mukherjee
- Nishant Aggarwal v. Kailash Kumar Sharma
- Mrs. Aparna A. Shah v. M/S. Sheth Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
- Jik Industries Limited & Ors. v. Amarlal v. Jumani and Another
- M/S Thermax Ltd. & Ors. v. K.M. Johny & Ors.
- Sarojben Ashwinkumar Shah v. State of Gujarat and Anr.
- Rallis India Ltd. v. Poduru Vidya Bhusan & Ors.
- Harshendra Kumar D. v. Rebatilata Koley Etc.
- M.A.A. Annamalai v. State of Karnataka & Another
- Dinesh B. Patel & Ors. v. State of Gujarat & Ors.
- State of NCT of Delhi Through Prosecuting Officer, Insecticides, Government of Nct, Delhi v. Rajiv Khurana
- Central Bank of India v. M/S. Asian Global Ltd. & Ors.
- National Small Industries Corp. Ltd. v. Harmeet Singh Paintal and Anr.