Limitation Act, 1963 · Chapter III: Computation of Period of Limitation
Section 19: Effect of payment on account of debt or of interest on legacy
In plain words
A payment towards a debt, or towards interest on a legacy, made before the time limit runs out starts a fresh period from the date of payment.
- The payment must be made by the person liable or their authorised agent.
- An acknowledgment of the payment must appear in the payer's handwriting or in a writing signed by them, except for interest paid before the 1st day of January, 1928.
- If a mortgagee is in possession of mortgaged land, receiving its rent or produce counts as payment.
- Money payable under a court decree or order is not a debt for this section.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
Where payment on account of a debt or of interest on a legacy is made before the expiration of the prescribed period by the person liable to pay the debt or legacy or by his agent duly authorised in this behalf, a fresh period of limitation shall be computed from the time when the payment was made:
Provided that, save in the case of payment of interest made before the 1st day of January, 1928, an acknowledgment of the payment appears in the handwriting of, or in a writing signed by, the person making the payment.
Explanation.—For the purposes of this section,—
(a) where mortgaged land is in the possession of the mortgagee, the receipt of the rent or produce of such land shall be deemed to be a payment;
(b) "debt" does not include money payable under a decree or order of a court.
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 15 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 19
-
Il & Fs Financial Services Limited v. Adhunik Meghalaya Steels Private Limited
Whether the Tribunals below were justified in holding that the s.7 application under the IBC filed by the appellant on 15.01.2024 was barred by time; does the entry in the Balance Sheet of F.Y. 2019-20 constitute a…
- Quadrant Televentures Limited v. Atc Telecom Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & Anr
-
Opg Power Generation Private Limited v. Enexio Power Cooling Solutions India Private Limited & Anr.
Issue arose as to whether the arbitral award is in conflict with the public policy of India, or/and is vitiated by patent illegality appearing on the face of the award; whether the holding company could have been…
-
Dharmendra Sharma v. Agra Development Authority
Whether the possession as offered by Agra Development Authority on 04.12.2014 should be taken as a valid offer of possession even if there was no completion certificate and whether the firefighting clearance certificate…
- Samyak Projects Private Limited v. Ansal Housing Limited
- Sahamal Singh v. Container Corporation of India Limited
- Arcelormittal India Pvt Ltd v. Jsc Ogcc Kazstroyservice
- Rajendra Narottamdas Sheth & Anr. v. Chandra Prakash Jain & Anr.
- Dena Bank (Now Bank of Baroda) v. C. Shivakumar Reddy and Anr.
- Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited v. Bishal Jaiswal & Anr.
- M/S Shanti Conductors (P) Ltd. v. Assam State Electricity Board and Ors. Review Petition (C) Nos. 786787 of 2019 in
- State of Gujarat v. M/S Kothari and Associates
- Prabhakaran and Ors. v. M. Azhagiripillai (Dead) by Lrs. and Ors.
- Pallav Sheth v. Custodian and Ors.
- P.N. Veeti Narayani v. Pathumma Beevl and Another
- Reet Mohinder Singh Sekhon v. Mohinder Parkash & Ors.
- Roshanlal Kuthiala & Ors. v. R. B. Mohan Singh Oberai
- A. S. Krishnappa Chettiar & Ors. v. Nachiappa Chettiar & Ors.