Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Chapter XVIII: Of Offences Relating to Documents and to Property Marks
Section 477: Fraudulent cancellation, destruction, etc., of will, authority to adopt, or valuable security
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to matters and proceedings from before that date, as the repealing law provides.
In plain words
Fraudulently, dishonestly, or to cause damage, cancelling, destroying, defacing or hiding (or attempting to) a will, an authority to adopt a son, or a valuable security, or committing mischief to it, is punishable with imprisonment for life or imprisonment of either description for up to seven years, and a fine.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
Whoever fraudulently or dishonestly, or with intent to cause damage or injury to the public or to any person, cancels, destroys or defaces, or attempts to cancel, destroy or deface, or secretes or attempts to secrete any document which is or purports to be a will, or an authority to adopt a son, or any valuable security, or commits mischief in respect of such document, shall be punished with [imprisonment for life], or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 477
-
Anurag Bhatnagar & Anr. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
(i) Whether the High Court in exercise of its power u/s.482 of CrPC or under Art.226/227 of the Constitution is justified in refusing to quash the FIR No.380/2005, u/ss.420, 120-B and 34 of the IPC and the order dated…
-
State by Deputy Superintendent of Police v. B.T. Ramesh & Anr.
Issue arose whether the High Court was justified in quashing the criminal proceedings, on the grounds of the chargesheet having been filed more than four years after the date of the alleged incident and lack of…
- Dheeraj Wadhawan v. CBI
- Shri Pradeep Koneru v. Directorate of Enforcement & Anr
-
The State of Odisha v. Nirjharini Patnaik @ Mohanty & Anr.
Chargesheet was filed against the Respondents in an FIR filed alleging a widespread conspiracy involving forgery of documents to facilitate the illegal transfer of valuable government land to private entities. SDJM,…
- Arvind Kejriwal v. Directorate of Enforcement
- Amanatullah Khan v. Directorate of Enforcement
- Ram Sharan Chaturvedi v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
- Jitul Jentilal Kotecha v. State of Gujarat and Ors. Etc
- Rakesh Kumar Paul v. State of Assam
- State of Jharkhand Through Sp, CBI v. Lalu Prasad @ Lalu Prasad Y Aday
- Rishipal Singh v. State of U.P. & Anr.
- Swiss Timing Limited v. Organising Committee, Commonwealth Games 2010 Delhi
- Sushila Tiwary and Others v. Allahabad Bank and Others
- Dharmeshbhai Vasudevbhai & Ors. v. State of Gujarat & Ors.
- General Manager, Uco Bank & Anr. v. M. Venuranganath
- Ref: v. Smt. Sayalee Sanjeev Joshi, Member, Maharashtra Public Service Commission
- State of Kerala v. M.M. Manikantan Nair
- Keshab Narayan Banerjee and Ors. v. The State of Bihar
- State of Maharashtra v. Keshav Ramchandra Pangare and Anr.
- S. Vasundara v. Canara Bank and Ors.
- M. A. Kochu Devassy Etc. v. State of Kerala
- Nand Kishore Prasad v. State of Bihar and Ors.
- Rohtas Industries Ltd. v. S. D. Agarwal & Anr.
- Ajit Kumar P Alit v. State of West Bengal
- Talab Haji Hussain v. Madhukar Purshottam Mondkar and Another
- M. P. Sharma and Others v. Satish Chandra, District Magistrate, Delhi, and Others