Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Chapter XVIII: Of Offences Relating to Documents and to Property Marks
Section 466: Forgery of record of Court or of public register, etc
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to matters and proceedings from before that date, as the repealing law provides.
In plain words
Forging a document or electronic record that purports to be a court record or proceeding, a register of birth, baptism, marriage or burial, a register kept by a public servant, a certificate or document made by a public servant in an official capacity, an authority to bring or defend a suit or confess judgment, or a power of attorney, is punishable with imprisonment of either description for up to seven years, and a fine.
- Here a register includes any list, data or record of entries kept in electronic form as defined in the Information Technology Act, 2000.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
[Whoever forges a document or an electronic record], purporting to be a record or proceeding of or in a Court of Justice, or a register of birth, baptism, marriage or burial, or a register kept by a public servant as such, or a certificate or document purporting to be made by a public servant in his official capacity, or an authority to institute or defend a suit, or to take any proceedings therein, or to confess judgment, or a power of attorney, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.
[Explanation.—For the purposes of this section, “register” includes any list, data or record of any entries maintained in the electronic form as defined in clause (r) of sub-section (1) of section 2 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (21 of 2000).]
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 466
-
Shanmugam @ Lakshminarayanan v. High Court of Madras
Whether the charge of criminal contempt is proved against the appellants-contemnors beyond all reasonable doubt; whether the conviction of the appellants by the High Court for criminal contempt of Court and the sentence…
-
Kanishk Sinha & Another v. The State of West Bengal & Another
Whether the High Court was justified in holding that the direction issued in Priyanka Srivastava v. State of Uttar Pradesh [2015] 4 SCR 108 that a complaint will be accompanied by an affidavit is prospective in nature…
- Neeraj Kumar Pandey v. Union of India and Ors
- Rahul Tyagi & Anr v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
- Coigate Palmolive Company & Ors v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
- Ian Cook v. State & Anr
- Michael J Tangney v. State & Anr
- K V Vaidyanathan & Ors v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
- Stephen C Patrick v. State & Anr
- Mitchell Abrahamsen v. State & Anr
- Manuel Arrese v. State & Anr
- G L Verma v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
- Vls Finance Ltd v. State NCT of Delhi and Ors
-
In Re: T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India & Ors.
The issues were : (i) Whether Tiger Safaris and Zoos are on the same footing; (ii) Whether establishment of a ‘Tiger Safari’ at Pakhrau in Corbett Tiger reserve was legal; (iii) Illegal construction in Corbett Tiger…
- Somnath Prajapati v. State (Nct of Delhi)
-
Shadakshari v. State of Karnataka & Anr.
Whether sanction u/s. 197 Cr.P.C. is required to prosecute respondent No. 2 who faces accusation amongst others of creating fake documents by misusing his official position as a Village Accountant, thus a public…
- Sardool Singh Through Sewa Singh v. Shiv Dayal & Anr
- Shri Sukhbir Singh Badal v. Balwant Singh Khera
- Pravat Chandra Mohanty v. The State of Odisha & Anr.
- M/S Bandekar Brothers Pvt. Ltd. & Anr v. Prasad Vassudev Keni, Etc. Etc
- Canara Bank v. P. Selathal and Ors. Etc.Etc.
- Chilakamarthi Venkateswarlu & Anr.V. State of Andhra Pradesh & Anr. v. State of Andhra Pradesh & Anr.
- Sasikala Pushpa and Others v. State of Tamil Nadu
- Motu Contempt Petition (Crl.) No. 1 of 2019 in Re: Mr. Mathews Nedumpara v. .
- Pankaj Jain v. Union of India & Anr.
- Issac @ Kishor v. Ronald Cheriyan and Ors.
- Jasbir Singh v. Tarasinghand Others
- Om Prakash & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.
- Babubhai Jamnadas Patel v. State Od Gujarat & Ors.
- Ajoy Kumar Ghose v. State of Jharkhand & Anr.
- K.K. Saravana Babu v. State of Tamil Nadu & Anr.
- Anjan1 Kumar v. State of Bihar and Anr.
- Ref: v. Smt. Sayalee Sanjeev Joshi, Member, Maharashtra Public Service Commission
- Smt. Parminder Kaur v. State of U.P. and Anr.
- Ravikant S. Patil v. Sarvabhouma S. Bagali
- Beena Philipose and Anr. v. State of Kerala
- In Re: S.K. Sundaram v. -
- State of Maharashtra v. Keshav Ramchandra Pangare and Anr.
- State of U.P. v. Ranjit Singh
- Satbir v. Surat Singh and Ors.
- Inderjit Singh and Ors. Etc. v. State of Punjab and Ors.
- Sheo Nandan Paswan v. State of Bihar & Ors.
- Sheonandan Paswan v. State of Bihar
- S. L. Goswami v. High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur
- State of U.P. v. Boota Singh & Others
- Nand Kishore Prasad v. State of Bihar and Ors.
- S. P. E. Madras v. K. v. Sundaravelu
- State of West Bengal v. Bejoy Kumar Bose Etc. Etc.
- Union of India v. Maj. I. C. Lala Etc. Etc.
- Govind Mehta v. State of Bihar
- Nani Gopal Mitra v. The State of Bihar
- Bhanwar Singh & Anr. v. State of Rajasthan
- Purushottamdas Dalmia v. The State of West Bengal
- The State of Andhra Pradesh v. Kandimalla Subbaiah and Another