Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Chapter XVI: Of Offences Affecting the Human Body · Of Criminal Force and Assault
Section 353: Assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
Whoever assaults or uses criminal force to any person being a public servant in the execution of his duty as such public servant, or with intent to prevent or deter that person from discharging his duty as such public servant, or in consequence of anything done or attempted to be done by such person to the lawful discharge of his duty as such public servant, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.
State amendments to this section
Maharashtra.— Amendment of section 353 of 45 of 1860.—In section 353 of the said Code, for the words “two years” the words “five years” shall be substituted. [Vide Maharashtra Act 40 of 2018, sec. 3]
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 353
-
Devendra Kumar v. The State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
High Court affirmed the order passed by the CMM directing registration of the FIR against the petitioner for offences punishable u/ss.186 and 341, Penal Code, 1860. Whether the CMM erred in involving the police in a…
-
Gurdeep Singh v. The State of Punjab
Issue arose whether the order of conviction and sentence of the appellant for the offences u/ss.307, 353, 332, 225, 186, and 120B IPC and s.25 of the Arms Act, 1959 by the courts below was legally sustainable.
-
Umashankar Yadav & Anr. v. State of Uttar Pradesh, Through Chief Secretary & Anr.
Whether the High Court erred by not quashing the prosecution against the accused under ss.186 and 353 of Indian Penal Code.
-
Karuppudayar v. State Rep. by the Deputy Superintendent
Whether the incident in question occurred at a place which can be termed to be a place within public view; whether the allegations in the FIR constitute an offence either under Section 3(1)(r) or under Section 3(1)(s)…
-
The State of Jharkhand & Others v. Vikash Tiwary @ Bikash Tiwary @ Bikash Nath
Whether the High Court was correct in quashing the order/ memo dated 17.05.2023 issued by the Inspector General of Prisons, Ranchi, Jharkhand, making intra-State transfer of the respondent herein from Lok Nayak Jai…
-
B.N. John v. State of U.P. & Anr.
Appellant herein has sought quashing of criminal proceedings arising under sections 353 and 186 of IPC.
-
Mahendra Kumar Sonker v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
Whether the conviction of the appellant under s.353 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) can be sustained without proving assault and use of criminal force.
-
Saumya Chaurasia v. Directorate of
Appellant aggrieved by the order of the High Court dismissing the bail application filed u/s.439 of Cr.P.C. has preferred this appeal. (i) Whether the appellant was prima facie found involved in the commission of the…
-
Afjal Ansari v. State of UP
What are the parameters to be considered for the suspension of conviction u/s. 389(1) CrPC; whether the appellant has made out a prima facie case for the suspension of conviction u/s. 389(1) CrPC; and whether conviction…
-
Ameena Begum v. The State of Telangana
An order of detention dated 24.03.2023 was passed by the Commissioner of Police against appellant’ s husband. Whether the alleged acts of commission for which the Detenu has been kept under detention are prejudicial to…
-
State of Haryana v. Dharamraj
In instant appeal, the State seeks cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the sole respondent by the Single Judge of the High Court.
- Mohd. Arif @ Ashfaq v. State (Nct of Delhi)
- Zakir Abdul Mirajkar v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
- Mohammed Zubair v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors
- State of West Bengal v. Rakesh Singh @ Rakesh Kumar Singh
- Parveen @ Sonu v. The State of Haryana
- Shantaben Bhurabhai Bhuriya v. Anand Athabhai Chaudhari & Ors.
- Commissioner of Police v. Raj Kumar
- Pradeep Kumar Sonthalia v. Dhiraj Prasad Sahu @ Dhiraj Sahu & Anr.
- Ahmad Ali Quraishi and Anr. v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
- Vikram Johar v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
- Lok Prahari, Through Its General Secretary S.N. Shukla v. Election Commission of India & Ors.
- Haribhau v. The State of Maharashtra
- Ganga Malik v. Union of India & Ors.
- Prem Giri v. State of Rajasthan
- Monica Kumar & Anr. v. State of U.P. & Ors.
- Surajsinh Alias Sonu Surajsinh Collectorsinh Alias Sevaram Rajput v. State of Gujarat
- Manik Taneja & Anr. v. State of Karnataka & Anr.
- Union of India Through CBI v. Nirala Yadav @ Raja Ram Yadav @ Deepak Yadav
- Mohd. Haroon & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
- Om Prakash & Ors. v. State of Jharkhand Through the Secretary, Department of Home, Ranchl-I & Anr.
- Rushikesh Tanaji Bhoite v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
- Mahendra Singh v. State of Utiaranchal
- Satyavir Singh Rathi v. State Thr. C.B.I
- Sunderlal Kanaiyalal Bhatija v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
- Hem Singh @ Hemu v. State of Haryana
- Virender Chaudhary v. Bharat Petroleum Corporation &Ors.
- Jagtamba Devi v. Hem Ram and Ors.
- Sumersinbh Umedsinh Rajput @ Sumersinh v. State of Gujarat
- State of Madhya Pradesh & Anr. v. Bachha Lal & Anr.
- G.M. Tank v. State of Gujarat and Anr.
- P.D. Agrawal v. State Bank of India and Ors.
- Commissioner of Police, New Delhi v. Narender Singh
- Sube Singh v. State of Haryana and Ors.
- State (N.C.T. of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu@Afsan Guru
- Manager, R.B.I., Bangalore v. S. Mani and Ors.
- Abdul Nazar Madani Etc v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr.
- State of Haryana and Ors. v. Mohinder Singh
- State Rep. by Deputy Superintendent of Police, Cbi, Vishakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh v. V. Ja Yachandra @ Ezhu Viral and Ors.
- State of Haryana v. Ghaseeta Ram
- State of Tamil Nadu v. Sivarasan @Raghu @Sivarasa and Ors.
- Delhi Judicial Service Association Tis Hazari Court, Delhi Etc. Etc. v. State of Gujarat and Ors. Etc. Etc.