Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Chapter XI: Of False Evidence and Offences against Public Justice
Section 192: Fabricating false evidence
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
Whoever causes any circumstance to exist or [makes any false entry in any book or record, or electronic record or makes any document or electronic record containing a false statement,] intending that such circumstance, false entry or false statement may appear in evidence in a judicial proceeding, or in a proceeding taken by law before a public servant as such, or before an arbitrator, and that such circumstance, false entry or false statement, so appearing in evidence, may cause any person who in such proceeding is to form an opinion upon the evidence, to entertain an erroneous opinion touching any point material to the result of such proceeding is said “to fabricate false evidence”.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 192
-
Suneeti Toteja v. State of U.P. & Another
Whether, in light of the facts and circumstances of this case and the position of law apropos to the sanction for prosecution, the High Court ought to have exercised its powers u/s.482 of the CrPC to quash the…
-
Sanjay Dutt & Ors. v. The State of Haryana & Anr.
According to the Range Forest Officer, the appellants (director and office bearers of the company) had illegally uprooted trees with JCB, destroyed them, and violated the section 4 of the Punjab Land Preservation Act,…
- Shri Sukhbir Singh Badal v. Balwant Singh Khera
- Mohammed Zubair v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors
- Bhima Razu Prasad v. State, Rep. by Deputy Superintendent of Police, Cbi/Spe/Acu-Ii
- M/S Bandekar Brothers Pvt. Ltd. & Anr v. Prasad Vassudev Keni, Etc. Etc
- Motu Contempt Petition (Crl.) No. 1 of 2019 in Re: Mr. Mathews Nedumpara v. .
- Dr. Subhash Kashinath Mahajan v. The State of Maharashtra and Anr.
- Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. & Anr. v. Datar Switchgear Ltd. & Ors.
- Ajoy Kumar Ghose v. State of Jharkhand & Anr.
- Iqbal Singh Marwah v. Meenakshi Etc.
- S.R. Ramaraj v. Special Court, Bombay
- N. Natarajan v. B.K. Subba Rao
- State of Maharashtra v. Mahboob S. Allibhoy and Anr.
- Phiroze Dinshaw Lam Etc. v. Union of India and Others.