Indian Evidence Act, 1872 · Chapter II: Of the Relevancy of Facts · Statements made under special circumstances
Section 34: Entries in books of account when relevant
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
In plain words
Entries in books of account, including electronic ones, regularly kept in the course of business, are relevant on matters the court is inquiring into, but are not by themselves enough to make anyone liable.
Example: A sues B for Rs. 1,000 and shows account entries recording the debt. They are relevant but not enough alone to prove it.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
[Entries in the books of account, including those maintained in an electronic form], regularly kept in the course of business, are relevant whenever they refer to a matter into which the Court has to inquire, but such statements shall not alone be sufficient evidence to charge any person with liability.
Illustration A sues B for Rs. 1,000, and shows entries in his account books showing B to be indebted to him to this amount. The entries are relevant, but are not sufficient, without other evidence, to prove the debt.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 34
- Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited v. Bishal Jaiswal & Anr.
- National Investigation Agency v. Zahoor Ahmad Shah Watali
- Common Cause (A Registered Society) and Others v. Union of India and Others
- Ramesh and Others v. State of Haryana
- R.V.F Venkatachala Gounder v. Arulmigu Viswesaraswami and V.P. Temple and Anr.
- Manish Dixit and Ors. v. State of Rajasthan
- Ishwar Dass Jain (Dead) Through L.Rs. v. Sohan Lal (Dead) by L.Rs.
- Central Bureau of Investigation v. V.C. Shukla and Ors.
- The State Bank of India v. Shri Yumnam Gouramani Singh
- Modern Hotel, Gudur Represented by M.N. Narayanan v. K. Radhakrishnaiah & Ors.
- Smt. Chandrakantaben Etc. v. Vadilal Bapalal Modi & Others.
- Chandradhar Goswami & Ors. v. The Gauhatl Bank Ltd.
- Sajjan Singh v. The State of Punjab