Indian Contract Act, 1872 · Chapter IV: Of the Performance of Contracts · Performance of reciprocal promises
Section 56: Agreement to do impossible act
An agreement to do an act impossible in itself is void.
Contract to do an act afterwards becoming impossible or unlawful.—A contract to do an act which, after the contract is made, becomes impossible, or, by reason of some event which the promisor could not prevent, unlawful, becomes void when the act becomes impossible or unlawful.1
Compensation for loss through non-performance of act known to be impossible or unlawful.—Where one person has promised to do something which he knew, or, with reasonable diligence, might have known, and which the promisee did not know, to be impossible or unlawful, such promisor must make compensation to such promisee for any loss which such promisee sustains through the nonperformance of the promise.
Illustrations
(a) A agrees with B to discover treasure by magic. The agreement is void:
(b) A and B contract to marry each other. Before the time fixed for the marriage,. A goes mad. The contract becomes void.
(c) A contracts to marry B, being already married to C, and being forbidden by the law to which he is subject to practise polygamy, A must make compensation to B for the loss caused to her by the non-performance of his promise.
(d) A contracts to take in cargo for B at a foreign port. A's Government afterwards declares war against the country in which the port is situated. The contract becomes void when war is declared.
(e) A contracts to act at a theatre for six months in consideration of a sum paid in advance by B. On several occasions A is too ill to act. The contract to act on those occasions becomes void.
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 15 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 56
-
Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Limited v. Hirehalli Solar Power Project Llp & Others
Whether the extension of the Scheduled Commissioning Date (SCD) was occasioned under the force majeure clause of the Power Purchase Agreement (PPA), and consequently, whether the reduction in tariff payable to the…
- M/S Alpine Housing Development Corporation Pvt. Ltd. v. Ashok S Dhariwal and Others
- Loop Telecom and Trading Limited v. Union of India and Anr.
- Psa Sical Terminals Pvt. Ltd. v. The Board of Trustees of V.O. Chidambranar Port Trust Tuticorin and Others
- G H South East Asia Marine Engineering and Constructions Ltd. (Seamec Ltd.) v. Oil India Limited
- National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India v. Alimenta S.A.
- Assam State Electricity Board and Ors. v. Buildworth Pvt. Ltd.
- Energy Watchdog v. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission and Ors. Etc.
- Pramod Jain and Others v. Securities and Exchange Board of India
- Delhi Development Authority v. Kenneth Builders & Developers Ltd. & Ors.
- Nandkishore Lalbhai Mehta v. New Era Fabrics Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
- Sri Ram Builders v. State of M.P. & Ors.
- Mary v. State of Kerala and Ors,
- Denel (Proprietary Limited) v. Bharat Electronics Ltd. & Anr.
- Rozan Mian v. Tahera Begum and Ors.
- State of Kerala and Anr. v. M.A. Mathai
- Hpa International v. Bhagwandas Fateh Chand Daswani and Ors.
- Pohla Singh @ Pohla Ram (D) by Lrs. and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Ors.
- Ganga Retreat and Towers Ltd. and Anr. v. State of Rajasthan and Ors.
- M.D., Army Welfare Housing Organisation v. Sumangal Services Pvt. Ltd.
- Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. v. Saw Pipes Ltd.
- Industrial Finance Corporation of India Ltd. v. The Cannanore Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd. and Anr.
- General Manager Northern Railways and Anr. v. Sarvesh Chopra
- M/S Raymond Ltd. and Anr. Etc. Etc. v. Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board and Ors. Etc. Etc.