Indian Contract Act, 1872 · Chapter IV: Of the Performance of Contracts · Performance of reciprocal promises
Section 55: Effect of failure to perform at fixed time, in contract in which time is essential
When a party to a contract promises to do a certain thing at or before a specified time, or certain things at or before specified times, and fails to do any such thing at or before the specified time, the contract, or so much of it as has not been performed, becomes voidable at the option of the promisee, if the intention of the parties was that time should be of the essence of the contract.
Effect of such failure when time is not essential.—If it was not the intention of the parties that time should be of the essence of the contract, the contract does not become voidable by the failure to do such thing at or before the specified time; but the promisee is entitled to compensation from the promisor for any loss occasioned to him by such failure.
Effect of acceptance of performance at time other than that agreed upon.—If, in case of a contract voidable on account of the promisor's failure to perform his promise at the time agreed, the promisee accepts performance of such promise at any time other than that agreed, the promisee cannot claim compensation for any loss occasioned by the non-performance of the promise at the time agreed, unless, at the time of such acceptance, he gives notice to the promisor of his intention to do so.1
State amendments to this section
Uttar Pradesh.—
Amendment of section 55.—In section 55 of the Principal Act, in the third paragraph, for the words "unless at the time of such acceptance he gives notice to the promiser of his intention to do so", the words "where at the time of such acceptance he has waived his right to do so" shall be substituted."
[Vide Uttar Pradesh 57 of 1976, s. 26]
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 15 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 55
-
Consolidated Construction Consortium Limited v. Software Technology Parks of India
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the Division Bench of High Court upholding the arbitral award.
-
Batliboi Environmental Engineers Limited v. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited and Another
Whether the Division Bench of the High Court was justified in allowing the appeal filed by the respondents u/s. 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and thereby setting aside the arbitral award.
- Desh Raj & Ors. v. Rohtash Singh
- Smt. Katta Sujatha Reddy & Anr. v. Siddamsetty Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd.& Ors.
- Welspun Specialty Solutions Limited (Formerly Known As Remi Metals Gujarat Ltd. v. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.
- Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. v. M/S. Datar Switchgear Limited & Ors.
- Assam State Electricity Board and Ors. v. Buildworth Pvt. Ltd.
- Padmakumari & Ors. v. Dasayyan &Ors.
- M/S. Kailash Nath Associates v. Delhi Development Authority & Anr.
- Rathnavathi & Another v. Kavita Ganashamdas
- L.S. Sikandar (D) by Lrs. & Ors. v. K. Subramani & Ors.
- Mis. Citadel Fine Pharmaceuticals v. Mis. Ramaniyam Real Estates P. Ltd. & Anr.
- Mrs. Saradamani Kandappan v. Mrs. S. Rajalakshmi & Ors.
- State of Kerala and Anr. v. M.A. Mathai
- Yogesh Mehta v. Custodian Appointed Under the Special Court & Ors.
- Mcdermott Interntional Inc. v. Burn Standard Co. Ltd. and Ors.
- General Manager Northern Railways and Anr. v. Sarvesh Chopra
- M/S Arosan Enterprises Ltd. v. Union of India and Anr.
- Sri Babu Ram @ Durga Prasad v. Sri Indra Pal Singh (Dead) by Lrs.
- K.S. Vidyanadam and Ors. v. Vairavan
- Assistant Excise Commissioner and Ors. v. Issac Peter and Ors. Etc. Etc.
- Smt. Chand Rani (Dead) by L.Rs. v. Smt. Kamal Rani (Dead) by L.Rs.