Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 · Jurisdiction and procedure
Section 24: Maintenance pendente lite and expenses of proceedings
Where in any proceeding under this Act it appears to the court that either the wife or the husband, as the case may be, has no independent income sufficient for her or his support and the necessary expenses of the proceeding, it may, on the application of the wife or the husband, order the respondent to pay to the petitioner the expenses of the proceeding, and monthly during the proceeding such sum as, having regard to the petitioners own income and the income of the respondent, it may seem to the court to be reasonable.
[Provided that the application for the payment of the expenses of the proceeding and such monthly sum during the proceeding, shall, as far as possible, be disposed of within sixty days from the date of service of notice on the wife or the husband, as the case may be.]
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 16 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 24
-
Rakhi Sadhukhan v. Raja Sadhukhan
Whether the quantum of permanent alimony of Rs.20,000/- per month, subject to a 5% increase every three years, fixed by the High Court ought to be enhanced.
-
Sukhdev Singh v. Sukhbir Kaur
Whether a spouse of a marriage declared as void under s.11 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, is entitled to claim permanent alimony and maintenance under u/s.25 of the Act; whether in a petition filed seeking a…
-
Rina Kumari @ Rina Devi @ Reena v. Dinesh Kumar Mahto @ Dinesh Kumar Mahato and Another
Will a husband, who secures a decree for restitution of conjugal rights, stand absolved of paying maintenance to his wife by virtue of Section 125(4), Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, if his wife refuses to abide by…
- Pooja Sharma v. Arun Sharma
-
Parvin Kumar Jain v. Anju Jain
In the instant case, the parties were married and have a son born from their wedlock, however, the realtionship soured and they have been living separately for more than two decades. The main issue between the parties…
- Amit Chandi v. Aarti Chandi @ Aarti Khanna
- Renu Sharma & Anr v. Mool Chand Sharma
- Renu Sharma v. Mc Sharma & Anr
- Kitty Bhardwaj v. Lalit Pyare Lal Bhardwaj
- Sonia v. Vishal
- Vishal v. Sonia
- Mohiet Aanand v. Parul Anand
- Sonia Khurana v. Pradeep Khurana
- Anita Mehra v. Satish Mehra
- Kamal Singh v. Kanta Bangari
- Chetram Mali v. Karishma Saini
- Rajni v. Arvind Singh & Anr
- Arvind Singh v. Rajni and Anr
- Master Aditya Vikram Kansagra & Anr v. Mr. Perry Kansagara
- Anju and Anr v. Rinku Dahiya
- Rinku Dahiya v. Anju &Anr
- Sunny Bedi Alias Rajbir Bedi v. Harpreet Singh
- Anil Kumar v. Neetu
- Kusum Sharma @ Sudershan Sharma v. Kuldeep Sharma
- Debarati Bhunia Chakraborty v. Suman Sankar Bhunia
- A.S v. D.S
- Neelam Goel v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
- Kamlesh Sharma v. Yogender Kumar Sharma
- Nidhi Jain v. Ankit Jain
- Sh. Dhirender Kumar v. Smt. Bala & Anr
- Bala & Anr v. Dhirender
- Rangesh Srinivasan v. Madhulika Bawa
- Rajnesh v. Neha & Anr.
- Manish Jain v. Akanksha Jain
- Kunapareddy @ Nookala Shanka Balaji v. Kunapareddy Swarna Kumar! & Anr.
- Jaiminiben Hirenbhai Vyas &Anr. v. Hirenbhai Rameshchandra Vyas &Anr.
- V.K. Vasantha Kumar! v. R. Sudhakar
- Rashmi Ajay Kr. Kesharwani & Anr. v. Ajay Kr. Kesharwani and Ors.
- Neeta Rakesh Jain v. Rakesh Jeetmal Jain
- Rajesh Burmann v. Mitul Chatterjee (Burman)
- Deepak Jain v. Charu Jain
- Naveen Kohli v. Neelu Kohli
- Smt. Jasbir Kaur Sehgal v. The District Judge Dehradun and Ors.
- Smt. Chand Dhawan v. Jawaharlal Dhawan
- Ramesh Chander Kaushal v. Veena Kaushal & Ors.