Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 · Chapter XXXVI: Limitation for Taking Cognizance of Certain Offences
Section 473: Extension of period of limitation in certain cases
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to matters and proceedings from before that date, as the repealing law provides.
In plain words
Despite the limitation rules, any court can take cognizance after the period expires if satisfied that the delay has been properly explained or that it is necessary in the interests of justice.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
Notwithstanding anything contained in the foregoing provisions of this Chapter, any Court may take cognizance of an offence after the expiry of the period of limitation, if it is satisfied on the facts and in the circumstances of the case that the delay has been properly explained or that it is necessary so to do in the interests of justice.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 473
-
Ghanshyam Soni v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
Issue arose whether the cognizance on the complaint u/ss.498A rw s.34 IPC was taken beyond the limitation period as mandated u/s.468 CrPC; and whether the prima facie case u/ss.498A rw s.34 IPC was made out against the…
- Smt. Ritu Aggarwal @ Aditi & Ors v. State & Anr
- Prithvi Pal Singh & Ors v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr. & Ors
-
Fuleshwar Gope v. Union of India & Ors.
Issue arose as to whether the validity of the Sanction Order can be challenged at any stage; whether violation of s.45(2) of the UAPA r/w rr.3 and 4 of the 2008 Rules, if any, vitiates the proceedings, whether violation…
- Anshul Bansal v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
- Acg Hospitality Private Limited & Ors v. The Registrar of Companies
- Yogesh Chandar Goyal & Ors v. The State & Anr
- Sanghmitra v. State
- Sh. Hemal Mehta & Anr v. State Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi Through S.H.O
-
Ram Nath v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
Interplay between the provisions of Chapter IX of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 (FSSA) and ss.272 and 273 of the Penal Code, 1860; whether the view taken by the Allahabad High Court in the case of M/s. Pepsico…
- Balbir Singh & Ors v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
- Independent Thought v. Union of India & Anr
- Serious Faraud Investigation Office v. Shonkh Technologies Ltd & Ors
- Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. M/S Shonkh Technologies Ltd & Ors
- Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. Shonkh Technologies Ltd & Ors
- Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. M/S Shonkh Technologies Ltd & Ors
- Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. Shonkh Technologies Ltd & Ors
- Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. Shonkh Technologies Ltd & Ors
- Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. M/S Shonkh Technologies & Ors
- Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. M/S Shonkh Technologies Ltd & Ors
- Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. M/S Shonkh Technologies Ltd & Ors
- Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. Shonkh Technologies Ltd & Ors
- Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. Shonkh Technologies Ltd & Ors
- Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. M/S Shonkh Technologies Ltd & Ors
- Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. M/S Shonkh Technologies Ltd & Ors
- Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. M/S Shonkh Technologies Ltd & Ors
- Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. M/S Shonkh Technologies Ltd & Ors
- Reliance Industries Limited v. Securities and Exchange Board of India & Ors.
- Kamatchi v. Lakshmi Narayanan
- Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai v. Pankaj Arora (Secretary) and Others
- S.P.S. Rathore v. C.B.I. & Anr.
- Rajdeep Sardesai v. State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors.
- Pawan Kumar Ralli v. Maninder Singh Narula
- Mrs. Sarah Mathew v. The Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases by Its Director - Dr. K.M. Cherian & Ors.
- P.K. Choudhury v. Commander, 48 Brtf (Gref)
- Sanapareddy Maheedhar and Anr v. State of Andhra Pradesh and Anr.
- Ramesh and Ors. v. State of Tamil Nadu
- N.C. Dhoundial v. Union of India and Ors.
- P.P. Unikrishnan and Anr. v. Puttiyottil Alikutty and Anr.
- Rakesh Kumar Jain v. State Through Cbi, New Delhi
- State of Himachal Pradesh v. Tara Dutt and Anr.
- Arun Vyas and Anr. v. Anita Vyas
- Keshav Lal Thakur v. State of Bihar
- Major Radha Krishan v. Union of India and Ors.
- Abdul Sathar Ibrahim Manik Etc v. Union of India and Ors.
- Srinivasa Gopal v. Union Territory of Arunachal Pradesh (Now State)