Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 · Chapter XXXVI: Limitation for Taking Cognizance of Certain Offences
Section 469: Commencement of the period of limitation
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to matters and proceedings from before that date, as the repealing law provides.
In plain words
The limitation period starts on the date of the offence, or, if the aggrieved person and the police did not know of it, the day either first learned of it, or, if the offender was unknown, the day either first learned who it was. The starting day itself is excluded.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
(1) The period of limitation, in relation to an offender, shall commence,—
(a) on the date of the offence; or
(b) where the commission of the offence was not known to the person aggrieved by the offence or to any police officer, the first day on which such offence comes to the knowledge of such person or to any police officer, whichever is earlier; or
(c) where it is not known by whom the offence was committed, the first day on which the identity of the offender is known to the person aggrieved by the offence or to the police officer making investigation into the offence, whichever is earlier.
(2) In computing the said period, the day from which such period is to be computed shall be excluded.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 469
-
Punit Beriwala v. The State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
Whether the High Court was justified in quashing the subject FIR against Respondent Nos.2 and 3 and whether a cognizable offence against them is prima facie made out from a reading of the subject complaint.
- Smt. Ritu Aggarwal @ Aditi & Ors v. State & Anr
- Prithvi Pal Singh & Ors v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr. & Ors
- Yogesh Chandar Goyal & Ors v. The State & Anr
- Balbir Singh & Ors v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
- Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. Shonkh Technologies Ltd & Ors
- Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. M/S Shonkh Technologies Ltd & Ors
- Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. M/S Shonkh Technologies Ltd & Ors
- Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. M/S Shonkh Technologies Ltd & Ors
- Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. M/S Shonkh Technologies Ltd & Ors
- Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. Shonkh Technologies Ltd & Ors
- Serious Faraud Investigation Office v. Shonkh Technologies Ltd & Ors
- Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. M/S Shonkh Technologies & Ors
- Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. M/S Shonkh Technologies Ltd & Ors
- Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. M/S Shonkh Technologies Ltd & Ors
- Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. Shonkh Technologies Ltd & Ors
- Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. Shonkh Technologies Ltd & Ors
- Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. M/S Shonkh Technologies Ltd & Ors
- Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. M/S Shonkh Technologies Ltd & Ors
- Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. Shonkh Technologies Ltd & Ors
- M/S Cheminova India Limited & Anr. v. State of Punjab and Ors.
- Mrs. Sarah Mathew v. The Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases by Its Director - Dr. K.M. Cherian & Ors.
- Udai Shankar Awasthi v. State of U.P. Anr.
- State of Himachal Pradesh v. Tara Dutt and Anr.
- State of Rajasthan v. Sanjay Kumar and Ors.
- State of Punjab v. Sarwan Singh