Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 · Chapter XXXIII: Provisions As to Bail and Bonds
Section 437: When bail may be taken in case of non-bailable offence
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to matters and proceedings from before that date, as the repealing law provides.
In plain words
A person accused of a non-bailable offence can be released on bail by the police or a court other than the High Court or Court of Session, except where there are reasonable grounds to believe they committed an offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life, or certain repeat offenders.
- Those exceptions can still be bailed if the person is under sixteen years of age, a woman, or sick or infirm, and repeat offenders for other special reasons.
- Needing the accused for identification is not by itself a reason to refuse bail. The Public Prosecutor must be heard for offences punishable with death, imprisonment for life or seven years or more.
- If there are no reasonable grounds but further inquiry is needed, bail must be given.
- For offences punishable with seven years or more, or under Chapters VI, XVI or XVII of the Indian Penal Code, the court must impose conditions to attend, not commit similar offences, and not tamper with evidence or witnesses.
- If a Magistrate's trial is not finished within sixty days of the first evidence date, an accused in custody throughout must ordinarily be bailed.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
[(1) When any person accused of, or suspected of, the commission of any non-bailable offence is arrested or detained without warrant by an officer in charge of a police station or appears or is brought before a Court other than the High Court or Court of session, he may be released on bail, but—
(i) such person shall not be so released if there appear reasonable grounds for believing that he has been guilty of an offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life;
(ii) such person shall not be so released if such offence is a cognizable offence and he had been previously convicted of an offence punishable with death, imprisonment for life or imprisonment for seven years or more, or he had been previously convicted on two or more occasions of [a cognizable offence punishable with imprisonment for three years or more but not less than seven years:]
Provided that the Court may direct that a person referred to in clause (i) or clause (ii) be released on bail if such person is under the age of sixteen years or is a woman or is sick or infirm:
Provided further that the Court may also direct that a person referred to in clause (ii) be released on bail if it is satisfied that it is just and proper so to do for any other special reason:
Provided also that the mere fact that an accused person may be required for being identified by witnesses during investigation shall not be sufficient ground for refusing to grant bail if he is otherwise entitled to be released on bail and gives an undertaking that he shall comply with such directions as may be given by the Court:] [Provided also that no person shall, if the offence alleged to have been committed by him is punishable with death, imprisonment for life, or imprisonment for seven years or more, be released on bail by the Court under this sub-section without giving an opportunity of hearing to the Public Prosecutor.]
(2) If it appears to such officer or Court at any stage of the investigation, inquiry or trial, as the case may be, that there are not reasonable grounds for believing that the accused has committed a non-bailable offence, but that there are sufficient grounds for further inquiry into his guilt, [the accused shall, subject to the provisions of section 446A and pending such inquiry, be released on bail], or, at the discretion of such officer or Court, on the execution by him of a bond without sureties for his appearance as hereinafter provided.
(3) When a person accused or suspected of the commission of an offence punishable with imprisonment which may extend to seven years or more or of an offence under Chapter VI, Chapter XVI or Chapter XVII of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) or abatement of, or conspiracy or attempt to commit, any such offence, is released on bail under sub-section (1), [the Court shall impose the conditions,—
(a) that such person shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed under this Chapter,
(b) that such person shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected, and
(c) that such person shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence, 1. Subs. by Act 63 of 1980, s. 5, for sub-section (1) (w.e.f. 23-9-1980). 2. Subs. by Act 25 of 2005, s. 37, for —a non-bailable and cognizable offence‖ (w.e.f. 23-6-2006). 3. Ins. by s. 37, ibid. (w.e.f. 23-6-2006). 4. Subs. by Act 63 of 1980, s. 5, for certain words (w.e.f. 23-9-1980). 5. Subs. by Act 25 of 2005, s. 37, for certain words (w.e.f. 23-6-2006).
and may also impose, in the interests of justice, such other conditions as it considers necessary.]
(4) An officer or a Court releasing any person on bail under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2), shall record in writing his or its [reasons or special reasons] for so doing.
(5) Any Court which has released a person on bail under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2), may, if it considers it necessary so to do, direct that such person be arrested and commit him to custody.
(6) If, in any case triable by a Magistrate, the trial of a person accused of any non-bailable offence is not concluded within a period of sixty days from the first date fixed for taking evidence in the case, such person shall, if he is in custody during the whole of the said period, be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Magistrate, unless for reasons to be recorded in writing, the Magistrate otherwise directs.
(7) If, at any time, after the conclusion of the trial of a person accused of a non-bailable offence and before judgment is delivered, the Court is of opinion that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the accused is not guilty of any such offence, it shall release the accused, if he is in custody, on the execution by him of a bond without sureties for his appearance to hear judgment delivered.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 437
-
Jamnalal v. State of Rajasthan and Another
In the instant appeal, the father of the prosecutrix challenges the order of the High Court. By the said order, the sentence imposed on respondent no.2 herein was suspended till the final disposal of the appeal. Whether…
-
Subhelal @ Sushil Sahu v. The State of Chhattisgarh
High Court denied regular bail to the appellant for offences punishable under Sections 420, 201, 120-B read with Section 34, Penal Code, 1860. On facts, appellant, if entitled to bail. Factors relevant for considering…
-
Suhas Chakma v. Union of India & Ors.
Access to free and timely legal aid for prison inmates.
-
V. Senthil Balaji v. The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement
Matter pertains to grant of bail to former Tamil Nadu transport minister against whom complaint was filed for offence u/s.3 PMLA, which is punishable u/s.4 PMLA for his alleged involvement in the job racket scam.
-
Dhanraj Aswani v. Amar S. Mulchandani & Anr.
Whether an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is maintainable at the instance of an accused while he is already in judicial custody in connection with his…
-
Tusharbhai Rajnikantbhai Shah v. Kamal Dayani & Ors.
Accused-petitioner was granted absolute interim protection of anticipatory bail by Supreme Court, until modified or altered upon final disposal of the present SLP which was pending consideration before this Court.…
-
Parvinder Singh Khurana v. Directorate of Enforcement
The issue involved in these appeals concerns the power of the High Court or Sessions Court to grant an interim order of stay of operation of an order granting bail till the disposal of the application for cancellation…
-
Sheikh Javed Iqbal @ Ashfaq Ansari @ Javed Ansari v. State of Uttar Pradesh
High Court whether justified in denying bail to the appellant, an under-trial prisoner prosecuted under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 1967 and Penal Code, 1860 who had been in custody for more than nine years.
-
Frank Vitus v. Narcotics Control Bureau & Ors.
The appellant was ordered to be enlarged on bail subject to various terms and conditions incorporated in the said order. The petitioner is aggrieved by the two conditions imposed while granting bail. The two conditions…
-
Tarsem Lal v. Directorate of Enforcement Jalandhar Zonal Office
(a) Whether the complaint filed u/s.44(1)(b) of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 will be governed by sections 200 to 205 of the CrPC; (b) If the accused was not arrested by the ED till the filing of the…
-
Gurwinder Singh v. State of Punjab & Another
Whether the High Court was justified in upholding the order passed by the Special Judge, rejecting the application filed u/s. 439 CrPC by the appellant seeking regular bail in a case registered under the Unlawful…
-
Saumya Chaurasia v. Directorate of
Appellant aggrieved by the order of the High Court dismissing the bail application filed u/s.439 of Cr.P.C. has preferred this appeal. (i) Whether the appellant was prima facie found involved in the commission of the…
-
Priya Indoria v. State of Karnataka and Ors.
Whether the power of the High Court or the Court of Session to grant anticipatory bail u/s 438 CrPC could be exercised with respect to an FIR registered outside the territorial jurisdict ion of the said Court; and…
- Md. Asfak Alam v. The State of Jharkhand & Anr.
- Omprakash Sahni v. Jai Shankar Chaudhary &
- Central Bureau of Investigation v. Vikas Mishra
- Ms. X v. The State of Maharashtra and Another
- The State Through Central Bureau of Investigation v. T. Gangi Reddy @ Yerra Gangi Reddy
- Vijay Madanlal Choudhary & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
- Mohammed Zubair v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors
- Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.
- Ms. P v. The State of Madhya Pradesh and Another
- Centrum Financial Services Limited v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
- Gautam Navlakha v. National Investigation Agency
- Venkatesan Balasubramaniyan v. The Intelligence Officer, D.R.I. Bangalore
- Saravanan v. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police
- Parvez Noordin Lokhandwalla v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
- Union of India v. Ashok Kumar Sharma and Others
- Pradeep Ram v. The State of Jharkhand & Anr.
- Kodungallur Film Society & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
- Sushila Aggarwal & Ors. v. State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
- Dr. Subhash Kashinath Mahajan v. The State of Maharashtra and Anr.
- Pankaj Jain v. Union of India & Anr.
- Lachhman Dass v. Resham Chand Kaler and Anr.
- Nikesh Tarachand Shah v. Union of India & Anr.
- Bhadresh Bipinbhai Sheth v. State of Gujarat &Another
- Sanghian Pandian Rajkumar v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.
- Dr. Subramanian Swamy & Ors. v. Raju Thr. Member Juvenile Justice Board & Anr.
- Sundeep Kumar Bafna v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
- Km. Hema Mishra v. State of U.P. and Others
- Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy v. Central Bureau of Investigation
- Central Bureau of Investigation v. V. Vijay Sai Reddy
- Sayed Mohd. Ahmed Kazmi v. State, Gnctd & Ors.
- Registrar General, Patna High Court v. Pandey Gajendra Prasad & Ors.
- Sanjay Chandra v. CBI
- Joseph Salvaraj A. v. State of Gujarat & Ors.
- Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra and Others
- Hdfc Bank Ltd. v. J.J. Mannan @ J.M. John Paul & Anr.
- Ravindra Saxena v. State of Rajasthan
- Subodh Kumar Yadav v. State of Bihar & Anr.
- In Re: Destruction of Public & Private Properties v. State of A.P. and Ors.
- Vaman Narain Ghiya v. State of Rajasthan
- Mohmed Amin @ Amin Choteli Rahim Miyan Shaikh & Anr. v. C.B.I Through Its Director
- N.R. Mon v. Md. Nasimuddin
- P.K. Shaji @ Thammanam Shaji v. State of Kerala
- State Through C.B.I. v. Amarmani Tripthi
- Jayendra Saraswathi Swamigal v. State of Tamil Nadu
- P. Rama Chandra Rao v. State of Karnataka
- Narinderjit Singh Sahni and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.
- Ram Prakash Pandey v. State of U.P. and Anr.
- State of West Bengal v. Pranab Ranjan Roy
- The State of Andhra Pradesh v. Bimal Krishna Kundu and Anr.
- Chandraswami and Another v. Central Bureau of Investigation
- Common Cause"Registered Society Through Its Director v. Union of India and Anr.
- Union of India v. Thamisharasi and Ors.
- Directorate of Enforcement v. Deepak Mahajan and Anr.
- Abdul Sathar Ibrahim Manik Etc v. Union of India and Ors.
- State of Maharashtra v. Anand Chintaman Dighe
- State Through Delhi Administration v. Sanja Y Gandhi
- Gurcharan Singh & Ors. v. State (Delhi Administration)
- Bashir and Others v. State of Haryana