Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 · Chapter XXXII: Execution, Suspension, Remission and Commutation of Sentences · D.–General provisions regarding execution
Section 428: Period of detention undergone by the accused to be set off against the sentence of imprisonment
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to matters and proceedings from before that date, as the repealing law provides.
In plain words
Time an accused spent in detention during the investigation, inquiry or trial of the same case before conviction is set off against their prison term (other than default imprisonment for a fine), and they serve only the remainder.
- For cases under section 433A, it is set off against the fourteen years required there.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
Where an accused person has, on conviction, been sentenced to imprisonment for a term, [,not being imprisonment in default of payment of fine], the period of detention, if any, undergone by him during the investigation, inquiry or trial of the same case and before the date of such conviction, shall be set off against the term of imprisonment imposed on him on such conviction, and the liability of such person to undergo imprisonment on such conviction shall be restricted to the remainder, if any, of the term of imprisonment imposed on him: [Provided that in cases referred to in section 433A, such period of detention shall be set off against the period of fourteen years referred to in that section.]
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 428
-
Manoj Tejraj Jain v. State of Gujarat
Challenge to the judgment of the High Court whereby the appeals filed by the appellants herein were dismissed against the judgment of the trial court convicting them for offences u/ss.25A and 29, Narcotic Drugs and…
-
Sukhdev Yadav @ Pehalwan v. State of (NCT of Delhi) & Others
Whether, an accused/convict who has completed his “life imprisonment for a fixed term” such as twenty years of actual sentence without remission, as in the instant case, is entitled to be released from prison on…
-
Sachin v. State of Maharashtra
Issue arose whether, the High Court could enhance the sentence under its revisional powers in a convict’s appeal against conviction.
-
Abdul Nassar v. State of Kerala & Anr.
Whether the prosecution has proved by leading clinching and convincing circumstantial evidence that the accused had committed forcible and violent sexual assault on the child victim and, thereafter, strangled and killed…
- Shyam Sunder v. State NCT of Delhi
- James v. State (Govt. of NCT Delhi)
- Vicky @ Deepak v. State (Gnct) of Delhi
- Pawan v. The State Government of NCT of Delhi
- Dolly v. State NCT of Delhi
- Satish Kumar v. State
- Rajinder Kumar v. The State (Govt. of Nct) of Delhi & Anr
- Mohd. Danish v. State (Govt. Ofnct Delhi)
- Lokesh @Machchhar v. State of NCT of Delhi
- Rahul v. State Govt of NCT Delhi and Ors
-
Rama Devi v. The State of Bihar and Others
Whether the High Court was justified in reversing the judgment of the trial court and acquitting the respondents of the charges punishable under Sections 302, 307, 333, 355 and 379, all read with Section 34 of the Penal…
- Tapas Haldar v. State of of NCT of Delhi & Anr
- Santram v. State of NCT of Delhi
- Rajaram v. State of NCT of Delhi
- Mohd Nasir and Ors v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
- Yusuf v. State Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi
- Geeta Arora @ Sonu Punjaban v. The State (Nct) of Delhi
- Lal Mohammad v. State
- Ajay Sondhi @ Dimpy v. State of Delhi
- Sushila @ Maya Devi & Anr v. State N.C.T. of Delhi
- Dheerpal Alias Kana v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
- Zulfikar @ Bobby v. State of NCT of Delhi
- Akil v. State (Nct of Delhi)
- Mohd Yasin @ Sahin v. State NCT of Delhi
- Chet Ram Yadav & Anr v. State of Delhi
- Veerpal @ Titu v. State
- Banarsi Lal@ Gobra v. State of NCT of Delhi
- Jamil v. The State of NCT of Delhi
- Mohd. Nasim v. State NCT of Delhi
- Narender Kumar @ Bittoo v. State NCT of Delhi
-
Navas @ Mulanavas v. State of Kerala
Appellant-accused was held guilty for the offences punishable u/ ss.302, 449, 309, IPC and sentenced accordingly. For the offence punishable u/s.302, IPC, he was sentenced to death. High Court confirmed the conviction,…
- Rajni v. Bses Rajdhani Power Limited
- Gulshan @ Sandeep @ Monu v. State (Nct of Delhi)
- Mahesh v. The State, NCT of Delhi
- Ayub v. State (Nct of Delhi)
- Udey Singh v. State
- Anil Kumar v. State (Nct of Delhi)
- Suraj v. State (Nct of Delhi)
- State v. Ariz Khan Alias Junaid Alias Anna Alis Salim
- Ariz Khan v. State of Delhi
- Smt Maya Devi v. State
- Jai Narayan v. State
- Sunil v. The State
- State v. Munesh Pal
- Gyarsi v. The State NCT of Delhi
- Mohd Ijhar Ansari v. State(Nct of Delhi)
- Suraj @ Juganu v. State
- Parmod Kumar Kushwaha v. State of Delhi
- Kamlesh v. State
- The State of Rajasthan v. Gurbachan Singh & Others
- Mr. Vinay Prakash Singh v. Sameer Gehlaut & Ors. in the Matter Of:- Shivinder Mohan Singh
- Abu Salem Abdul Kayyum Ansari v. The State of Maharashtra
- Mohammad Irfan v. State of Karnataka
- Venkatesh @ Chandra & Anr. Etc v. State of Karnataka
- Krishnamurthy @ Gunodu and Others v. State of Karnataka
- Gautam Navlakha v. National Investigation Agency
- Kalabhai Hamirbhai Kachhot v. State of Gujarat
- Anokhilal v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- N. Ramamurthy v. State by Central Bureau of Investigation, A.C.B., Bengaluru
- Bilal Hajar @ Abdul Hameed v. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police
- Sharad Hiru Kolambe v. State of Maharashtra and Others
- Atul Thakur v. State of Himachal Pradesh Etc. Etc.
- The State of Uttar Pradesh v. Tribhuwan & Ors.
- Mukesh & Anr. v. State for NCT of Delhi & Ors.
- In Re: to Issue Certain Guidelines Regarding Inadequacies and Deficiencies in Criminal Trials v. .
- State of Karnataka v. Selvi J. Jayalalitha & Ors.
- Vikas Yadav v. State of U.P. and Ors. Etc. Etc.
- Mohd. Arif @Ashfaq v. He Registrar, Supreme Court of India & Ors.
- Ramaiah @ Rama v. State of Karnataka
- State of Rajasthan v. Shambhu Kewat and Another
- Suresh Kumar v. State of Haryana
- Samrendra Beura v. U.O.I. & Others
- Life Convict Bengal @ Khoka @ Prasanta Sen v. B.K. Srivastava & Ors.
- Sasikumar & Anr. v. State of Kerala
- State of M.P. v. Ayub Khan
- Pathan Hussain Basha v. State of A.P.
- Munna Kumar Upadhyaya @ Munna Upadhyaya v. The State of Andhra Pradesh Through Public Prosecutor, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh
- Madhu v. State of Kerala
- Elavarasan v. State Rep. by Inspector of Police
- Monica Bedi v. State of Ap.
- Atul Manubhai Parekh v. Central Bureau of Investigation
- Gurmukh Singh v. State of Haryana
- V. Kannan v. State Rep. by Inspector of Police
- State of Punjab v. Madan Lal
- Swamy Shraddananda @ Murali Manohar Mishra v. State of Karnataka
- Beena Philipose and Anr. v. State of Kerala
- Mukhtiar Ahmed Ansari v. State (N.C.T. of Delhi)
- State of Rajasthan v. Biram Lal
- Dashrath Singh v. State of U.P.
- State of Haryana v. Jarnail Singh and Ors.
- Ashfaq v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
- Maliyakkal Abdul Azeez v. Assistant Collector, Kerala and Anr.
- Babu Ram and Anr. v. State of U.P. and Ors.
- State of Maharashtra and Anr. v. Najakat Alia Mubarak Ali
- Union of India and Ors. v. Sadha Singh
- Union of India and Ors. v. Anand Singh Bisht