Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 · Chapter XXIX: Appeals
Section 386: Powers of the Appellate Court
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
After perusing such record and hearing the appellant or his pleader, if he appears, and the Public Prosecutor if he appears, and in case of an appeal under section 377 or section 378, the accused, if he appears, the Appellate Court may, if it considers that there is no sufficient ground for interfering, dismiss the appeal, or may—
(a) in an appeal from an order or acquittal, reverse such order and direct that further inquiry be made, or that the accused be re-tried or committed for trial, as the case may be, or find him guilty and pass sentence on him according to law;
(b) in an appeal from a conviction—
(i) reverse the finding and sentence and acquit or discharge the accused, or order him to be re-tried by a Court of competent jurisdiction subordinate to such Appellate Court or committed for trial, or
(ii) alter the finding, maintaining the sentence, or
(iii) with or without altering the finding, alter the nature or the extent, or the nature and extent, of the sentence, but not so as to enhance the same—
(c) in an appeal for enhancement of sentence—
(i) reverse the finding and sentence and acquit or discharge the accused or order him to be re-tried by a Court competent to try the offence, or
(ii) alter the finding maintaining the sentence, or
(iii) with or without altering the finding, alter the nature or the extent, or, the nature and extent, of the sentence, so as to enhance or reduce the same;
(d) in an appeal from any other order, alter or reverse such order;
(e) make any amendment or any consequential or incidental order that may be just or proper:
Provided that the sentence shall not be enhanced unless the accused has had an opportunity of showing cause against such enhancement:
Provided further that the Appellate Court shall not inflict greater punishment for the offence which in its
opinion the accused has committed, than might have been inflicted for that offence by the Court passing the order or sentence under appeal.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 386
-
Kailas S/o Bajirao Pawar v. The State of Maharashtra
Issue arose whether the High Court was justified in ordering a re-trial; if not, then what would be the appropriate order that may be passed in this appeal.
-
Sachin v. State of Maharashtra
Issue arose whether, the High Court could enhance the sentence under its revisional powers in a convict’s appeal against conviction.
-
Sudershan Singh Wazir v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
Issue arose as regards the correctness of orders passed by the High Court staying the discharge of the accused and directing him to surrender before the trial court.
-
P. Manikandan v. Central Bureau of Investigation and Ors.
Whether the High Court was justified in directing re-investigation and retrial of the same offence on the same set of facts, after acquitting the accused by giving him the benefit of doubt; Whether, in the attending…
-
Sunita Devi v. The State of Bihar & Anr.
Need for a comprehensive sentencing policy. Trial against the accused under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 was conducted by the judicial officer in utmost haste and the accused was denied due…
-
Chandra Pratap Singh v. State of M.P.
Whether the High Court was justified in altering the charge u/s. 302 read with ss. 148 and/or 149 to a charge u/s . 302/34 IPC, and convicting and sentencing the appellant for the offence punishable u/s 302/34 and u/s.…
-
Munna Pandey v. State of Bihar
Whether the High Court erred in confirming the conviction and death sentence passed by trial court against appellant-accused for offences punishable u/ss.302, 376, IPC and s.4, POCSO Act, 2012, despite serious lapses in…
- Harendra Rai v. The State of Bihar & Ors.
- Gireesan Nair & Ors. Etc. v. State of Kerala
- P. Ponnusamy v. The State of Tamil Nadu
- Ashok Kumar Singh Chandel v. State of U.P.
- Bhola Kumhar v. State of Chhattisgarh
- Nasib Singh v. The State of Punjab & Anr.
- Rohtas & Anr. v. State of Haryana
- Sandeep Kumar and Others v. State of Uttarakhand and Another
- State of NCT of Delhi v. Shiv Charan Bansal & Ors.
- State of Uttarakhand v. Darshan Singh
- P Ramesh v. State Rep by Inspector of Police
- Kumar Ghimirey v. The State of Sikkim
- Atma Ram & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan
- Mala Singh & Ors. v. State of Haryana
- Kanubhai Bhagvanbhai Nayak v. State of Gujarat
- Issac @ Kishor v. Ronald Cheriyan and Ors.
- State Through Central Bureau of Investigation, Special Crime Branch, Mumbai, Maharashtra v. Sanvlo Naik & Anr.
- Kumaran v. State of Kerala & Anr.
- Sudha Renukaiah & Ors. v. State of A. P.
- State of Himachal Pradesh v. Nirmala Devi
- Ganesh Shamrao Andekar & Anr. v. State of Maharashtra
- Ajay Kumar Ghoshal Etc. v. State of Blhar & Anr.
- Vikas Yadav v. State of U.P. and Ors. Etc. Etc.
- State of M.P. v. Madan Lal
- Nar Singh v. State of Haryana
- Dinubhai Boghabhai Solanki v. State of Gujarat & Ors.
- Savarala Sai Sree v. Gurramkonda Vasudevarao & Ors.
- Suresh Kumar v. State of Haryana
- Surya Baksh Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh
- B. Raghuvir Acharya v. Central Bureau of Investigation
- Chinnam Kameswara Rao and Ors. v. State of Ap. Rep. by Home Secretary
- Bhimanna v. State of Karnataka
- Mohd. Hussain @ Julfikar Ali v. The State (Govt. of Nct) Delhi
- Prithipal Singh Etc v. State of Punjab & Anr. Etc.
- C. Ronald & Anr. v. State, U.T. of Andaman & Nicobar Islands
- Satyavir Singh Rathi v. State Thr. C.B.I
- Inspector of Police, Tamil Nadu v. John David
- State of U.P. v. Guru Charan & Others
- State of U.P. v. Ram Sajivan & Ors.
- Md. Ankoos & Ors. v. The Public Prosecutor, H!Gh Court of A.P.
- Jayabalan v. U.T. of Pondicherry
- Raj Narain Singh v. State of U.P. & Ors.
- Mahtab Singh & Anr. v. State of U.P.
- State of U.P. v. Sukhpal Singh & Others
- M/S. Kumar Exports v. M/S. Sharma Carpets
- R. Kalyani v. Janak C. Mehta and Ors.
- Ghurey Lal v. State of U.P.
- State of U.P. v. Punni and Ors.
- Popular Muthiah v. State of Tamil Nadu
- R. Janakiraman v. State Represented by Inspector of Police, Cbi, Spe, Madras
- State of M.P. v. Bala @ Balaram
- Md. Munna v. Union of India and Ors.
- The State of West Bengal and Ors. v. Babu Chakraborty
- Zahira Habibulla H Sheikh and Anr. v. State of Gujarat and Ors.
- State of U.P v. Abhai Raj Singh and Anr.
- State of Rajasthan v. Bhawani and Anr.
- Amar Singh v. Balwinder Singh and Ors.
- Commandant 20 Bn. Itb Police v. Sanjay Binjola
- State of Tamil Nadu v. Rajendran
- State of U.P. v. Dharmendra Singh and Anr. Etc.
- Supreme Court Bar Association v. Union of India