Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 · Chapter XXVIII: Submission of Death Sentences for Confirmation
Section 368: Power of High Court to confirm sentence or annul conviction
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to matters and proceedings from before that date, as the repealing law provides.
In plain words
In a death sentence reference, the High Court can confirm the sentence or pass any other lawful sentence, annul the conviction and convict of another offence, order a new trial, or acquit. It cannot confirm until the appeal period ends or any appeal is decided.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
In any case submitted under section 366, the High Court—
(a) may confirm the sentence, or pass any other sentence warranted by law, or
(b) may annul the conviction, and convict the accused of any offence of which the Court of Session might have convicted him, or order a new trial on the same or an amended charge, or
(c) may acquit the accused person:
Provided that no order of confirmation shall be made under this section until the period allowed for preferring an appeal has expired, or, if an appeal is presented within such period, until such appeal is disposed of.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 368
-
P. Manikandan v. Central Bureau of Investigation and Ors.
Whether the High Court was justified in directing re-investigation and retrial of the same offence on the same set of facts, after acquitting the accused by giving him the benefit of doubt; Whether, in the attending…
-
Munna Pandey v. State of Bihar
Whether the High Court erred in confirming the conviction and death sentence passed by trial court against appellant-accused for offences punishable u/ss.302, 376, IPC and s.4, POCSO Act, 2012, despite serious lapses in…
- Dinubhai Boghabhai Solanki v. State of Gujarat & Ors.
- Vikas Yadav v. State of U.P. and Ors. Etc. Etc.
- Mohd. Arif @Ashfaq v. He Registrar, Supreme Court of India & Ors.
- Rameshwar Prasad v. State of Rajasthan
- P. Rathinam/Nabhusan Patnaik v. Union of India and Anr.
- State of Orissa v. Ram Chander Agarwala Etc.