Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 · Chapter XXVII: The Judgment
Section 357: Order to pay compensation
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
(1) When a Court imposes a sentence of fine or a sentence (including a sentence of death) of which fine forms a part, the Court may, when passing judgment, order the whole or any part of the fine recovered to be applied—
(a) in defraying the expenses of properly incurred in the prosecution;
(b) in the payment to any person of compensation for any loss or injury caused by the offence, when compensation is, in the opinion of the Court, recoverable by such person in a Civil Court;
(c) when any person is convicted of any offence for having caused the death of another person or of having abetted the commission of such an offence, in paying compensation to the persons who are, under the Fatal Accidents Act, 1855 (13 of 1855), entitled to recover damages from the person sentenced for the loss resulting to them from such death;
(d) when any person is convicted of any offence which includes theft, criminal misappropriation, criminal breach of trust, or cheating, or of having dishonestly received or retained, or of having voluntarily assisted in disposing of, stolen property knowing or having reason to believe the same to be stolen, in compensating any bona fide purchaser of such property for the loss of the same if such property is restored to the possession of the person entitled thereto.
(2) If the fine is imposed in a case which is subject to appeal no such payment shall be made before the period allowed for presenting the appeal has elapsed, or, if an appeal be presented, before the decision of the appeal.
(3) When a Court imposes a sentence, of which fine does not form a part, the Court may, when passing judgment, order the accused person to pay, by way of compensation, such amount as may be specified in the order to the person who has suffered any loss or injury by reason of the act for which the accused person has been so sentenced.
(4) An order under this section may also be made by an Appellate Court or by the High Court or Court of Session when exercising its powers of revision.
(5) At the time of awarding compensation in any subsequent civil suit relating to the same matter, the Court 1. Ins. by Act 25 of 2005, s. 29 (w.e.f. 23-6-2006).
shall take into account any sum paid or recovered as compensation under this section.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 357
-
Byluru Thippaiah @ Byaluru Thippaiah @ Nayakara Thippaiah v. State of Karnataka
Issue arose as regards commutation of the death sentence awarded to the appellant for committing brutal murder of his wife, sister-in-law and his three children.
-
Dhanasingh Prabhu v. Chandrasekar & Another
Whether the High Court was right in dismissing the complaint on the ground that the name of the partnership firm was not mentioned in the statutory notice issued by the appellant/complainant to the respondents u/s.138…
-
Rajendra Anant Varik v. Govind B. Prabhugaonkar
Whether the High Court was justified in reversing the judgment of the First Appellate Court acquitting the appellant-accused and setting aside his conviction u/s.138, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as recorded by the…
-
Pinki v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr.
Whether the High Court erred in passing various orders granting bail to accused persons in matters involving offences of serious nature of child trafficking.
-
Central Bureau of Investigation v. Ashok Sirpal
Matter pertains to the challenge to the order passed by the High Court suspending the sentence of imprisonment and the fine imposed on the accused who was convicted for embezzlement of Rs. 46 lakhs.
-
Rajendra Bhagwanji Umraniya v. State of Gujarat
Respondents herein were convicted by the Sessions Court for offence punishable u/s. 325 IPC and were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment of five years. However, the High Court reduced the sentence of five years…
-
Rakesh Ranjan Shrivastava v. The State of Jharkhand & Anr.
Whether the provision of sub-section (1) of s.143A, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, which provides for the grant of interim compensation, is directory or mandatory. If it is held to be a directory provision, what are…
-
Harendra Rai v. The State of Bihar and Ors.
In a murder case, the acquittal of respondent no.2 recorded by Trial Court and the High Court having been reversed and respondent no.2 having being convicted u/ss.302 and 307 IPC by the Supreme Court by an earlier…
- Mukesh Singh v. The State (Nct of Delhi)
- Talat Sanvi v. State of Jharkhand & Anr.
- Rahul v. State of Delhi Ministry of Home Affairs & Anr.
- Noor Mohammed v. Khurram Pasha
- Bhola Kumhar v. State of Chhattisgarh
- State of Gujarat & Anr. v. Narayan @ Narayan Sai @ Mota Bhagwan Asaram @ Asumal Harpalani
- Bhagwan Narayan Gaikwad v. The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
- Dharmesh @ Dharmendra @ Dhamo Jagdishbhai @ Jagabhai Bhagubhai Ratadia & Anr. v. The State of Gujarat
- Government of Maharashtra (Water Resources Department) Represented by Executive Engineer v. M/S Borse Brothers Engineers & Contractors Pvt. Ltd.
- P. Mohanraj & Ors. v. M/S. Shah Brothers Ispat Pvt. Ltd.
- M. Hariharasudhan v. R. Karmegam and Ors.
- G. .J. Raja v. Tejraj Surana
- Suryakant Baburao @ Ramrao Phad v. State of Maharashtra and Others
- Surinder Singh Deswal @ Col. S.S. Deswal and Others v. Virender Gandhi
- Dauwalal @ Ganesh Devangan & Ors. v. State of Madhya Pradesh (Now State of Chhattisgarh)
- Jitendra @ Kalla v. State of Govt. of NCT of Delhi
- Bilal Hajar @ Abdul Hameed v. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police
- S. Nambi Narayanan v. Siby Mathews & Others Etc.
- Satyendra Kumar Mehra @ Satendera Kumar Mehra v. The State of Jharkhand
- M/S. Meters and Instruments Private Limited & Anr. v. Kanchan Mehta
- Ms. Z v. The State of Bihar and Others
- Kumaran v. State of Kerala & Anr.
- Najabhai Desurbhai Wagh v. Valerabhai Deganbhai Vagh & Ors.
- Vikas Yadav v. State of U.P. and Ors. Etc. Etc.
- Tekan Alias Tekram v. State of Madhya Pradesh (Now Chhattisgarh)
- Vinay&Ors. v. State of Karnataka&Anr.
- State of Punjab v. Saurabh Bakshi
- Jage Ram & Ors. v. State of Haryana