Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 · Chapter XXVII: The Judgment
Section 354: Language and contents of judgment
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
(1) Except as otherwise expressly provided by this Code, every judgment referred to in section 353,—
(a) shall be written in the language of the Court;
(b) shall contain the point or points for determination, the decision thereon and the reasons for the decision;
(c) shall specify the offence (if any) of which, and the section of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) or other law under which, the accused is convicted, and the punishment to which he is sentenced;
(d) if it be a judgment of acquittal, shall state the offence of which the accused is acquitted and direct that he be set at liberty.
(2) When the conviction is under the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) and it is doubtful under which of two sections, or under which of two parts of the same section, of that Code the offence falls, the Court shall distinctly express the same, and pass judgment in the alternative.
(3) When the conviction is for an offence punishable with death or, in the alternative, with imprisonment for life or imprisonment for a term of years, the judgment shall state the reasons for the sentence awarded, and, in the case of sentence of death, the special reasons for such sentence.
(4) When the conviction is for an offence punishable with imprisonment for a term of one year or more, but the Court imposes a sentence of imprisonment for a term of less than three months, it shall record its reasons for awarding such sentence, unless the sentence is one of imprisonment till the rising of the Court or unless the case was tried summarily under the provisions of this Code.
(5) When any person is sentenced to death, the sentence shall direct that he be hanged by the neck till he is dead.
(6) Every order under section 117 or sub-section (2) of section 138 and every final order made under section 125, section 145 or section 147 shall contain the point or points for determination, the decision thereon and the reasons for the decision.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 354
-
Harshad Gupta v. The State of Chhattisgarh
The Judge who had convicted the appellant was transferred post conviction, before the appellant could be heard on the quantum of sentence and a new Judge was posted in his place. Appellant relying on Sections 353 and…
-
Sunita Devi v. The State of Bihar & Anr.
Need for a comprehensive sentencing policy. Trial against the accused under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 was conducted by the judicial officer in utmost haste and the accused was denied due…
-
Madan v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Six deaths were caused on account of brutal firing by the appellants and other accused persons. The trial court imposed sentence of capital punishment to the appellants (‘M’ and ‘S’) herein for the offence punishable…
- Sundar @ Sundarrajan v. State by Inspector of
- Sukhpal Singh Khaira v. The State of Punjab
- In Re: Framing Guidelines Regarding Potential Mitigating Circumstances to Be Considered While Imposing Death Sentences v. In Re: Framing Guidelines Regarding Potential Mitigating Circumstances to Be Considered While Imposing Death Sentences
- Manoj Pratap Singh v. The State of Rajasthan
- Manoj & Ors v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- Veerendra v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- Mohd. Firoz v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- Pappu v. The State of Uttar Pradesh
- Bhagwani v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
- Lochan Shrivas v. The State of Chhattisgarh
- Bhagchandra v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- Hari & Anr. v. The State of Uttar Pradesh
- In Re: to Issue Certain Guidelines Regarding Inadequacies and Deficiencies in Criminal Trials v. The State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors.
- Shatrughna Baban Meshram v. State of Maharashtra
- Manoj Suryavanshi v. State of Chhattisgarh
- Ravi S/O Ashok Ghumare v. The State of Maharashtra
- Ravishankar @ Baba Vishwakarma v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
- Manoharan v. State by Inspector of Police, Variety Hall Police Station, Coimbatore
- Deep Narayan Chourasia v. State of Bihar
- Md Mannan @ Abdul Mannan v. State of Bihar
- Nand Kishore v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- M. A. Antony @ Antappan v. State of Kerala
- Rajendra Pralhadrao Wasnik v. State of Maharashtra
- Chhannu Lal Verma v. The State of Chhattisgarh
- Babasaheb Maruti Kamble v. State of Maharashtra
- Justice K S Puttaswamy (Retd.), and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.
- Shayara Bano v. Union of India and Others
- Mukesh & Anr. v. State for NCT of Delhi & Ors.
- Vasanta Sampat Dupare v. State of Maharashtra
- Shabnam v. State of U. P.
- Md. Jamiludin Nasir v. State of West Bengal
- Jaiminiben Hirenbhai Vyas &Anr. v. Hirenbhai Rameshchandra Vyas &Anr.
- B. Kumar@ Jayakumar@ Left. Kr.@ S. Kumar v. Insp. of Police Th. C.B.C.L.D.
- Mohd. Arif @Ashfaq v. He Registrar, Supreme Court of India & Ors.
- Santosh Kumar Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- Amar Singh Yadav v. State of U.P.
- Mahesh Dhanaji Shinde v. State of Maharashtra
- Anil @ Anthony Arikswamy Joseph v. State of Maharashtra
- Shatrughan Chauhan & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
- Sunil Dutt Sharma v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
- State of Rajasthan v. Jamil Khan
- Deepak Rai v. State of Bihar
- Sunil Damodar Gaikwad v. State of Maharashtra
- Shankar Kisanrao Khade v. State of Maharashtra
- Prem Kaur v. State of Punjab and Ors.
- Devender Pal Singh Bhullar v. State of N.C.T. of Delhi
- Yakub Abdul Razak Memon v. The State of Maharashtra, Through Cbi, Bombay
- Sanaullah Khan v. State of Bihar
- Sandesh Alias Sainath Kailash Abhang v. State of Maharashtra
- Oma @ Omprakash and Anr. v. State of Tamil Nadu
- Sangeet & Anr. v. State of Haryana
- Guru Basavaraj @ Beene Settappa v. State of Karnataka
- Ajay Pandit @ Jagdish Dayabhai Patel & Anr. v. State of Maharashtra
- Rajendra Pralhadrao Wasnik v. The State of Maharashtra
- Ramnaresh & Ors. v. State of Chhattisgarh
- Brajendrasingh v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- Sonu Sardar v. State of Chhatisgarh
- State of Punjab v. Dalbir Singh
- Rajesh Kumar v. State Through Govt. of NCT of Delhi-Ii
- State of Maharashtra v. Goraksha Ambaji Adsul
- Sheo Shankar Singh v. State of Jharkhand & Anr.
- B.A. Umesh v. Regr.Gen.High Court of Karnataka
- Rameshbhai Chandubhai Rathod v. The State of Gujarat
- Main Pal v. State of Haryana
- Atbir v. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi
- Mulla & Anr. v. State of U.P.