Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 · Chapter XVI: Commencement of Proceedings Before Magistrates
Section 210: Procedure to be followed when there is a complaint case and police investigation in respect of the same offence
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to matters and proceedings from before that date, as the repealing law provides.
In plain words
If, during a complaint case, it appears a police investigation into the same offence is in progress, the Magistrate must stay the proceedings and call for a report. If the police report leads to cognizance against an accused in the complaint case, both are tried together as a police case. Otherwise the complaint case resumes.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
(1) When in a case instituted otherwise than on a police report (hereinafter referred to as a complaint case), it is made to appear to the Magistrate, during the course of the inquiry or trial held by him, that an investigation by the police is in progress in relation to the offence which is the subject-matter of the inquiry or trial held by him, the Magistrate shall stay the proceedings of such inquiry or trial and call for a report on the matter from the police officer conducting the investigation.
(2) If a report is made by the investigating police officer under section 173 and on such report cognizance of any offence is taken by the Magistrate against any person who is an accused in the complaint case, the Magistrate shall inquire into or try together the complaint case and the case arising out of the police report as if both the cases were instituted on a police report.
(3) If the police report does not relate to any accused in the complaint case or if the Magistrate does not take cognizance of any offence on the police report, he shall proceed with the inquiry or trial, which was stayed by him, in accordance with the provisions of this Code.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 210
- Satpal Kalra & Anr v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr
- Abhishek Kumar v. Neha Lal
- Uravashi Fakay v. State of NCT of Delhi
- Sunil Fakay v. State of NCT of Delhi
- Ashish Mehra v. M/S Byways India Pvt. Ltd
- Ramji Sharma v. M/S. Byways India Pvt. Ltd
- Guneet Singh Dhingra & Ors v. State of NCT Delhi & Anr
- Maj Gen. V.K.Singh (Retd.) v. C.B.I
- Kapil Agarwal and Others v. Sanjay Sharma and Others
- Kattukulangara Madhavan (Dead) Thr. Lrs. v. Majeed & Ors.
- Samaj Parivartan Samudaya & Ors. v. State of Karnataka &Ors.
- Kuldip Yadav & Ors. v. State of Bihar
- Pal @ Palla v. State of Uttar Pradesh
- Keki Hormusji Gharda and Ors. v. Mehervan Rustom Irani and Anr.
- Dilawar Singh v. State of Delhi
- Mohan Raj v. Dimbeswari Saikia & Anr
- Sankaran Moitra v. Sadhna Das and Anr.
- Rupan Deol Bajaj and Anr. v. Kanwar Pal Singh Gill and Anr.
- State of Bihar v. Murad Ali Khan, Farukh Salauddin & Vikram Singh