Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 · Chapter XVI: Commencement of Proceedings Before Magistrates
Section 209: Commitment of case to Court of Session when offence is triable exclusively by it
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
When in a case instituted on a police report or otherwise, the accused appears or is brought before the Magistrate and it appears to the Magistrate that the offence is triable exclusively by the Court of Session, he shall— [(a) commit, after complying with the provisions of section 207 or section 208, as the case may be, the case to the Court of Session, and subject to the provisions of this Code relating to bail, remand the accused to custody until such commitment has been made;]
(b) subject to the provisions of this Code relating to bail, remand the accused to custody during, and until the conclusion of, the trial;
(c) send to that Court the record of the case and the documents and articles, if any, which are to be produced in evidence;
(d) notify the Public Prosecutor of the commitment of the case to the Court of Session.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 209
-
Dashwanth v. State of Tamil Nadu
Trial Court found appellant guilty for the charges framed u/ss.302, 201, 363, 366 and 354-B of the IPC and s.8 r/w. s.7 and s.6 r/w. s.5(m) of the POCSO Act. An appeal against the said conviction was dismissed by the…
-
Zainul v. The State of Bihar
The High Court dismissed the appeal preferred by the appellants herein and thereby affirmed the judgment and order of conviction passed by the Trial Court in Sessions Case No. 124 of 1989 holding the appellants herein…
-
Kallu Nat Alias Mayank Kumar Nagar v. State of U.P. and Anr.
Whether the Court of Session, without itself recording evidence, can summon a person to stand trial in exercise of its powers u/s.193, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 as an accused (along with others committed to it by…
-
Vasant @ Girish Akbarasab Sanavale & Anr. v. The State of Karnataka
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court reversing the acquittal of the appellants-husband and mother-in-law of the deceased-wife and held them both guilty of offences under the Penal…
-
Sovaran Singh Prajapati v. The State of Uttar Pradesh
a. Whether the Trial Court followed the basic requirements of a fairly conducted trial, in accordance with well-established prepositions of law, before imposing death sentence upon the Appellant/Accused? b. Whether the…
-
Ashok Saxena v. The State of Uttarakhand Etc.
Whether the High Court committed any error in holding the appellant guilty of the offence of murder.
-
Lalita v. Vishwanath & Ors.
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court acquitting the respondents for the offence punishable u/ss.306, 498A, and 34 IPC; and incase the first informant dies before stepping into the…
-
Vijay @ Vijayakumar v. State Represented by Inspector of Police
Whether the appellant's act of causing the death of the deceased fell within the scope of "grave and sudden provocation" under Exception 1 to Section 300 of the Penal Code (IPC), thereby reducing the offence from…
-
Ram Pyarey v. The State of Uttar Pradesh
Correctness of the order of conviction against the brother-in-law for the offences punishable u/ss.306, 498-A IPC and s.4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, in the absence of any cogent evidence.
-
Basamsetti Rama Devi v. The State of A.P. & Ors.
In cases relating to quashing of criminal complaint against the accused police officers-respondents in matters of custodial death, whether the High Court was justified in setting aside the committal order and…
-
Sunita Devi v. The State of Bihar & Anr.
Need for a comprehensive sentencing policy. Trial against the accused under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 was conducted by the judicial officer in utmost haste and the accused was denied due…
-
Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation and Anr.
The Amicus submitted report dated 10.02.2024 indicating the directions that have been complied with by the parties in terms of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil**. On basis of the said…
-
Munna Pandey v. State of Bihar
Whether the High Court erred in confirming the conviction and death sentence passed by trial court against appellant-accused for offences punishable u/ss.302, 376, IPC and s.4, POCSO Act, 2012, despite serious lapses in…
- Acharya v. State of Maharashtra, (2001) 5 SCC 453 : 2001
- Sukhpal Singh Khaira v. The State of Punjab
- Ramanand @ Nandlal Bharti v. State of Uttar Pradesh
- Subramanya v. State of Karnataka
- Shahaja @ Shahajan Ismail Mohd. Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra
- Ramveer Upadhyay & Anr. v. State of U.P. & Anr.
- The State of Sikkim v. Jasbir Singh & Anr.
- The State by S.P. Through the Spe CBI v. Uttamchand Bohra
- Pradeep S. Wodeyar v. The State of Karnataka
- Shantaben Bhurabhai Bhuriya v. Anand Athabhai Chaudhari & Ors.
- Manjeet Singh v. State of Haryana & Ors.
- Gautam Navlakha v. National Investigation Agency
- Sartaj Singh v. State of Haryana & Anr. Etc.
- Bikramjit Singh v. The State of Punjab
- Sushila Aggarwal and Others v. State (Nct of Delhi) and Another
- Rajesh & Ors. v. State of Haryana
- Securities and Exchange Board of India v. Classic Credit Ltd.
- Soyebbhai Yusufbhai Bharania & Ors. v. State of Gujarat
- Ramesh and Others v. State of Haryana
- Saddik @ Lalo Gulam Hussein Shaikh & Ors. v. State of Gujarat
- Balveer Singh & Anr. v. State of Rajasthan & Anr.
- State of Uttar Pradesh and Others v. Anil Kumar Sharma and Another ,
- Prasad Shrikant Purohit v. State of Maharashtra & Anr
- R. N. Agarwal v. R. C. Bansal & Ors.
- C.K. Dasegowda & Ors. v. State of Karnataka
- Hardeep Singh v. State of Punjab & Ors.
- Umesh Kumar v. State of Andhra Pradesh & Anr
- Dharam Pal & Ors. v. State of Haryana & Anr.
- Ajay Kumar Parmar v. State of Rajasthan
- Central Bureau of Investigation, Hyderabad v. K. Narayana Rao
- Nupur Talwar v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.
- Laxmichand @ Balbutya v. State of Maharashtra
- Sajjan Kumar v. Central Bureau of Investigation
- Uma Shankar Singh v. State of Bihar and Anr.
- Shivjee Singh v. Nagendra Tiwary and Ors.
- Jaswant & Anr. v. State of Rajasthan
- Ashok Kumar v. State of U.P. and Anr.
- Kishangiri Mangalgiri Goswami v. State of Gujarat
- Somon v. State of Kerala
- Viji & Anr. v. State of Karnataka
- Sarabjit Rick Singh v. Union of India
- Lallan Chaudhary and Ors. v. State of Bihar and Anr.
- Popular Muthiah v. State of Tamil Nadu
- Prakash Kumar @ Prakash Bhutto v. State of Gujarat
- State Rep. by Inspector of Police and Ors. v. N.M.T. Joy Immaculate
- Bipin Chandra Parshottamdas Patel (Vakil) v. State of Gujarat and Ors.
- Uday v. State of Karnataka
- Rosy and Anr. v. State of Kerala and Ors.
- Ranjit Singh v. State of Punjab
- Satbir v. Surat Singh and Ors.
- Raj Kjshore Prasad v. State of Bihar
- Nisar and Anr v. State of U.P
- State of Maharashtra v. Dr. Budhikota Subharao
- Kishun Singh and Ors. v. State of Bihar