Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 · Chapter I: Suits in General · JURISDICTION OF THE COURTS AND Res Judicata
Section 9: Courts to try all civil suits unless barred
The Courts shall (subject to the provisions herein contained) have jurisdiction to try all suits of a civil nature excepting suits of which their cognizance is either expressly or impliedly barred.
[Explanation I].—A suit in which the right to property or to an office is contested is a suit of a civil nature, notwithstanding that such right may depend entirely on the decision of questions as to religious rites or ceremonies.
[Explanation II].—For the purposes of this section, it is immaterial whether or not any fees are attached to the office referred to in Explanation I or whether or not such office is attached to a particular place.]
State amendments to this section
Maharashtra.—
Section 9A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, in its application to the State of Maharashtra (hereinafter referred to as "the principal Act"), shall be deleted.
[Vide Maharashtra Act 61 of 2018, sec. 2.]
Notwithstanding the deletion of section 9A of the principal Act,—
(1) where consideration of a preliminary issue framed under section 9A is pending on the date of commencement of the Code of Civil Procedure (Maharashtra Amendment) Act, 2018 (hereinafter, in this section, referred to as "the Amendment Act"), the said issue shall be deemed to be an issue framed under Order XIV of the principal Act and shall be decided by the Court, as it deems fit, along with all other issues, at the time of final disposal of the suit itself :
Provided that, the evidence, if any, led by any party or parties to the suit, on the preliminary issue so framed under section 9A, shall be considered by the Court along with evidence, if any, led on other issues in the suit, at the time of final disposal of the suit itself ;
(2) in all the cases, where a preliminary issue framed under section 9A has been decided, holding that the Court has jurisdiction to entertain the suit, and a challenge to such decision is pending before a revisional Court, on the date of commencement of the Amendment Act, such revisional proceedings shall stand abated :
Provided that, where a decree in such suit is appealed from any error, defect or irregularity in the order upholding jurisdiction shall be treated as one of the ground of objection in the memorandum of appeal as if it had been included in such memorandum ;
(3) in all cases, where a preliminary issue framed under section 9A has been decided, holding that the Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the suit, and a challenge to such decision is pending before an appellate or revisional Court, on the date of commencement of the Amendment Act, such appellate or revisional proceedings shall continue as if the Amendment Act has not been enacted and section 9A has not been deleted :
Provided that, in case the appellate or revisional Court, while partly allowing such appeal or revision, remands the matter to the trial Court for reconsideration of the preliminary issue so framed under section 9A, upon receipt of these proceedings by the trial Court, all the provisions of the principal Act shall apply ;
(4) in all cases, where an order granting an ad-interim relief has been passed under sub-section (2) of section 9A prior to its deletion, such order shall be deemed to be an ad-interim order made under Order XXXIX of the principal Act and the Court shall, at the time of deciding the application in which such an order is made, either confirm or vacate or modify such order.
[Vide Maharashtra Act 61 of 2018, sec. 3.]
Maharashtra.—
In section 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Maharashtra Amendment) Act, 2018, for clause (1), the following clause shall be substituted and shall be deemed to have been substituted with effect from 27th June 2018, being the date of commencement of the said Act, namely:—
"(1) where consideration of a preliminary issue framed under section 9A is pending on the date of commencement of the Code of Civil Procedure (Maharashtra Amendment) Act, 2018 (hereinafter, in this section, referred to as "the Amendment Act"), the said issue shall be decided and disposed of by the Court under section 9A, as if the said section 9A has not been deleted;".
[Vide Maharashtra Act 72 of 2018, sec. 2, (w.e.f. 27-6-2018.)]
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 15 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 9
-
Kapadam Sangalappa and Others v. Kamatam Sangalappa and Others
Matter pertains to the execution of the compromise decree passed in a dispute as regards performance of religious rituals and the custody of idols and paraphernalia associated with the common deity Lord Sangalappa…
-
K.S. Manjunath and Others v. Moorasavirappa @ Muttanna Chennappa
Whether the High Court committed any error in passing the impugned judgment whereby it allowed the appeals filed by the vendees and set aside the decree passed by the Trial Court, while granting the relief of specific…
-
Sanjit Singh Salwan & Ors. v. Sardar Inderjit Singh Salwan & Ors.
Issue arose as regards to whether a plea of estoppel in law can be permitted to be raised by a party ignoring its conduct that resulted in the other party altering its position to its detriment in view of such conduct.
-
Odisha State Financial Corporation v. Vigyan Chemical Industries and Others
The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant u/Art.227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the civil proceedings and the orders passed by the Courts below regarding the computation of interest…
-
Supply Corporation Limited & Anr. v. Sanjay Kumar
Whether the dispute between the respondents and the appellant arising out of the agreement incorporating the arbitration clause has become non-arbitrable in view of the initiation and pendency of the criminal cases;…
-
M/S Tamil Nadu Cements Corporation Limited v. Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council and Another
Whether a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution would be maintainable against an order passed by the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council (MSEFC) in exercise of power under Section 18 of the…
-
Central Bank of India & Anr. v. Smt. Prabha Jain & Ors.
Whether the jurisdiction of civil court to try a suit is completely barred by s.34 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.
-
Abdul Rejak Laskar v. Mafizur Rahman & Ors.
The High Court held that the s.154(1)(e) of the the Assam Land and Revenue Regulation, 1886 bars the civil court from exercising its jurisdiction; whether the High Court committed any error in taking view that the suit…
-
M/s Al-Can Export Pvt. Ltd. v. Prestige H.M. Polycontainers Ltd. & Ors.
Matter pertains to the legality, validity and propriety of the auction proceedings conducted by the Tahsildar of the subject property, originally owned by the respondent No. 1; whether the provisions of Order XXI r. 90…
-
Ltd. v. State Industrial & Investment Corpn. of Maharashtra
Suspension of legal proceedings as envisaged u/s. 22(1) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, if would extend to a suit for recovery of money even if the debt sought to be proved in the plaint…
-
Karam Chand Thapar case [Chief Inspector of Mines v. Lala
State Commission held that the tariffs offered by the L-4 and L-5 bidders were not aligned to the prevailing market prices. In appeal by L-5, APTEL held that the State Commission had to necessarily adopt the tariff and…
-
N N Global Mercantile (P) Ltd. v. Indo Unique Flame Ltd. (2023) 7
The issue at hand arose in the context of three statutes; the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, and the Indian Contract Act, 1872. The Stamp Act imposes duty on “instruments”.…
- Cox and Kings Ltd. v. Sap India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
-
Mumtaz Yarud Dowla Wakf v. M/S Badam
Objection raised by the respondents that the suit filed by the appellant as decreed, ought not to have been entertained by the Wakf Tribunal, was dismissed by the Executing Court. High Court, whether justified in…
-
Urban Improvement Trust, Bikaner v. Gordhan
Whether land acquisition proceedings can be declared null and void for failure to give notice u/s.52(2) of the Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959 to the owners who had purchased the land two years earlier through…
- Damodhar Narayan Saw Ale (D) Through Lrs. v. Shri
- Shivshankara & Anr. v. H.P. Vedavyasa Char
- Thiru K. Palaniswamy v. M. Shanmugam & Ors.
- Vivek Narayan Sharma v. Union of India
- M/S. Patil Automation Private Limited and Ors. v. Rakheja Engineers Private Limited
- Sau Rajani v. Sau Smita & Anr
- Veena Singh (Dead) Through Lr v. The District Registrar/Additional Collector (F/R) and Another
- The Secretary to Govt. of Kerala, Irrigation Department and Others v. James Varghese and Others
- The State of Haryana Through Secretary to Government of Haryana v. Jai Singh & Ors.
- Shri K. Jayaram & Ors. v. Bangalore Development Authority & Ors.
- V Nagarajan v. Sks Ispat and Power Ltd.& Ors.
- Nitaben Dinesh Patel v. Dinesh Dahyabhai Patel
- Ratul Mahanta v. Nirmalendu Saha
- Shri Saurav Jain & Anr. v. M/S A. B. P. Design & Anr.
- Telangana State Wakf Board & Anr. v. Mohamed Muzafar
- Madras Bar Association v. Union of India and Anr.
- Vidya Drolia and Others v. Durga Trading Corporation
- Sri Marthanda Varma (D) Thr. Lrs. & Anr. v. State of Kerala & Ors.
- M/S Embassy Property Developments Pvt. Ltd.V. State of Karnataka & Ors. v. State of Karnataka & Ors
- Kantaru Rajeevaru v. Indian Young Lawyers Association Thr. Its General Secretary and Ors.
- Nusli Neville Wadia v. Ivory Properties & Ors.
- South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr. v. M/S. Today Homes and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Etc.
- Meg Raj (Dead) Thr. L.Rs. & Ors. v. Manphool(Dead) Thr. L.Rs. & Ors.
- The Competent Authority Calcutta, Under the Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 and Anr. v. David Mantosh & Ors.
- Pyarelal v. Shubhendra Pilania (Minor) Through Natural Guardian (Father) Shri Pradeep Kumar Pilania & Ors.
- M/S. Emaar Mgf Land Limited v. Aftab Singh
- Mar Koorilos (Dead) and Anr. Etc. v. M. Pappy (Dead) and Another Etc.
- Kutchi Lal Rameshwar Ashram Trust Evam Anna Kshetra Trust Thr. Velji Devshi Patel v. Collector, Haridwar & Ors.
- Srei Infrastructure Finance Limited v. Tuff Drilling Private Limited
- M/S Unichem Laboratories Ltd. v. Rani Devi & Anr.
- Shri Vimal Kishor Shah & Ors. v. Mr. Jayesh Dinesh Shah & Ors.
- Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India, Ministry of Law & Ors.
- Lal Shah Baba Dargah Trust v. Magnum Developers and Others
- Foreshore Co-Operative Housing Society Limited v. Praveen D.Desai (Dead) Thr. Lrs. and Others
- K.P. Manu v. Chairman, Scrutiny Committee for Verification of Community Certificate
- M/S. Sundaram Finance Limited and Another v. T. Thankam
- International Amusement Limited v. India Trade Promotion Organisation &Anr.
- G. Manikyamma & Others v. Roudri Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. & Others
- Madras Bar Association v. Union of India and Another
- World Sport Group (Mauritius) Ltd. v. Msm Satellite (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.
- Chatterjee Petrochem Co. & Anr v. Haldia Petrochemicals Ltd. & Ors.
- Jagdish Singh v. Heeralal and Others
- Prabhudas Damodar Kotecha & Ors. v. Manhabala Jeram Damodar & Anr.
- Akkode Jumayath Palu Paripalana Committee v. P.V. Ibrahim Haji and Others
- The Commissioner, Bangalore Development Authority & Anr. v. Brijesh Reddy & Anr.
- Chloro Controls (I) P. Ltd. v. Severn Trent Water Purification Inc. and Ors.
- Bharat Aluminium Co. v. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Service, Inc.
- Sinnamani & Anr. v. G. Vettivel and Ors.
- Margret Almeida & Ors. Etc. Etc. v. The Bombay Catholic Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. & Ors. Etc. Etc.
- Horil v. Keshav & Anr.
- M/S. National Seeds Corporation Ltd. v. M. Madhusudhan Reddy and Another
- Shri Girish Vyas & Anr. . v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
- Dayaram v. Sudhir Batham & Ors.
- Trans Mediterranean Airways v. M/S Universal Exports & Anr.
- Ethiopian Airlines v. Ganesh Narain Saboo
- The Secretary, Sh. A. P. D.Jain Pathshala & Ors. v. Shivaji Bhagwat More & Ors.
- Shankara Co-Op Housing Society Ltd. v. M. Prabhakar & Ors.
- Amina Beevi v. Thachi & Ors.
- Union of India v. R. Gandhi, President, Madras Bar Association
- Raj Kumar Shivhare v. Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement & Another
- R. Ravindra Reddy and Ors. v. H. Ramaiah Reddy and Ors.
- Ramchandra Dagdu Sonavane (Dead) by Lrs. & Ors. v. Vithu Hira Mahar (Dead) by Lrs. & Ors.
- Nahar Industrial Enterprises Ltd. v. Hong Kong & Shanghai Banking Corporation
- E.L.C.M. Exports Limited v. South Indian Corpn. (Agencies) Ltd. & Anr.
- Vishnu Dutt Sharma v. Daya Sapra
- Om Prakash Singh v. M. Lingamaiah & Ors.
- Nawab Shaqafath Ali Khan & Ors. v. Nawab Imdad Jah Bahadur & Ors.
- V. Laxminarasamma v. A. Yadaiah (Dead) & Ors.
- Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation --I & Anr. v. Bal Mukund Bairwa
- Ksl & Industries Ltd. v. Mis Arihant Threads Ltd. & Ors.
- Tata Motors Ltd. v. Pharmaceutical Products of India Ltd. & Anr.
- United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Ajay Sinha and Another
- Mahant Dooj Das (Dead) Through Lr. v. Udasin Panchayati Bara Akhara & Anr.
- Rajasthan Srtc & Ors v. Mohar Singh
- LIC of India v. R. Suresh
- V. Laxminarasamma v. A. Yadaiah (Dead) and Ors.
- Chief Engineer, Hydel Project & Ors. v. Ravinder Nath & Ors.
- Commissioner, Bangalore Development Authority v. K.S. Narayan
- Indian Bank v. Abs Marine Products Pvt. Ltd.
- Vinayaka Dev Idagunji and Ors. v. Shivaram and Ors.
- Smt. Claude-Lila Parulekar v. M/S. Sakal Papers Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.
- Vithalbhai Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India
- Jamshed N. Guzdar v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.