Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 · Chapter I: Suits in General · JURISDICTION OF THE COURTS AND Res Judicata
Section 11: Res judicata
No Court shall try any suit or issue in which the matter directly and substantially in issue has been directly and substantially in issue in a former suit between the same parties, or between parties under whom they or any of them claim, litigating under the same title, in a Court competent to try such subsequent suit or the suit in which such issue has been subsequently raised, and has been heard and finally decided by such Court.
Explanation I.— The expression former suit shall denote a suit which has been decided prior to a suit in question whether or not it was instituted prior thereto.
Explanation II.— For the purposes of this section, the competence of a Court shall be determined irrespective of any provisions as to a right of appeal from the decision of such Court.
Explanation III.—The matter above referred to must in the former suit have been alleged by one party and either denied or admitted, expressly or impliedly, by the other.
Explanation IV.— Any matter which might and ought to have been made ground of defence or attack in such former suit shall be deemed to have been a matter directly and substantially in issue in such suit.
Explanation V.— Any relief claimed in the plaint, which is not expressly granted by the decree, shall for the purposes of this section, be deemed to have been refused.
Explanation VI.— Where persons litigate bona fide in respect of a public right or of a private right claimed in common for themselves and others, all persons interested in such right shall, for the purposes of this section, be deemed to claim under the persons so litigating .
[Explanation VII.— The provisions of this section shall apply to a proceeding for the execution of a decree and references in this section to any suit, issue or former suit shall be construed as references, respectively, to a proceeding for the execution of the decree, question arising in such proceeding and a former proceeding for the execution of that decree.
Explanation VIII.— An issue heard and finally decided by a Court of limited jurisdiction, competent to decide such issue, shall operate as res judicata in a subsequent suit, notwithstanding that such Court of limited jurisdiction was not competent to try such subsequent suit or the suit in which such issue has been subsequently raised.]
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 15 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 11
-
Delhi Development Authority v. Corporation Bank & Ors.
Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the auction was per se illegal being conducted in violation of the terms and conditions of the lease deed and the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and Income Tax…
-
Operation Asha v. Shelly Batra & Ors.
Issue arose as to whether the appellant Society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 can be said to have fulfilled all the requirements stipulated u/s.92 CPC for the purpose of instituting a suit under…
-
Smt. Arifa & Ors. v. Abhiman Apartment Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. & Ors.
Issue arose whether the liberty granted to file a fresh suit by the High Court would enable the party to revive a cause of action and save limitation, so as to enable raking up all grounds earlier raised and rejected by…
-
Sulthan Said Ibrahim v. Prakasan & Ors.
Issue arose whether the High Court committed any error in rejecting the original petition filed by the appellant on the ground that the I.A. for deletion of name of the appellant from the array of parties was barred by…
-
S.C. Garg v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
The appellant’s petition u/s.482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 seeking quashment of Criminal Case No. 7489 of 2002 pending on the file of Chief Judicial Magistrate for offences u/s.420 of the Penal Code, 1860 was…
-
Securities and Exchange Board of India v. Ram Kishori Gupta & Anr.
Whether SEBI can pass multiple final orders on the same cause of action; applicability of principles of res judicata/constructive res judicata; whether the Appellate Tribunal was justified in setting aside the 2018…
-
Puja Ferro Alloys P Ltd. v. State of Goa and Ors.
Whether the appellant-companies are covered by the notification issued by the State dated 30.09.1991 for the purpose of availing 25% rebate on the tariff chargeable for availing power supply.
-
H. Anjanappa & Ors. v. A. Prabhakar & Ors.
Whether a transferee pendente lite has a right to be impleaded in the suit by seeking leave to appeal and in case he is not impleaded, whether he is bound by the decree passed in the said suit.
-
Ivan Rathinam v. Milan Joseph
Whether the presumption of legitimacy, if not displaced, determines paternity in law; whether the Civil Court had the jurisdiction to entertain the Original Suit and whether the Family Court was entitled to reopen the…
-
Muskan Enterprises & Anr. v. The State of Punjab & Anr.
Issue arose whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the subsequent petition u/s.482, Cr. PC on the ground that since the earlier petition had been withdrawn without liberty obtained to apply afresh, the…
-
State of Andhra Pradesh and Others v. Dr. Rao, V.B.J. Chelikani and Others
Issue arose that whether the Government, like any private individual, have the absolute discretion to frame policy, distribute resources and enter into a contract with whomsoever it pleases, on any terms and conditions…
-
M/s HPCL Bio-Fuels Ltd. v. M/s Shahaji Bhanudas Bhad
(i) Whether a fresh application u/s.11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by the respondent could be said to be maintainable more particularly when no liberty to file a fresh application was granted…
-
Limited & Ors. v. Bapuna Alcobrew Private Limited & Anr.
Issue arose as to whether s.56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003 has application to a demand raised by appellants-distributor on the first respondent for recovery of sums payable under the Electricity Act, 1910 and,…
-
Har Narayan Tewari (D) Thr. Lrs. v. Cantonment Board,
Whether the present suit (claiming title and possession over the suit land) as filed by the plaintiff-appellant was barred under Section 11 CPC on principle of res judicata inasmuch as there was no adjudication of the…
-
Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr. v. M/s BSK Realtors LLP & Anr.
a) Whether the dismissal of a civil appeal preferred by one appellant in the first round operates as res judicata against the other appellant in the second round before this Court; b) Whether suppression of the first…
-
Association for Democratic Reforms v. Election Commission of India and Another
Petitioners sought directions for re-introduction of the paper ballot system; or that the printed slip from the Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) machine be given to the voter to verify, and put in the ballot…
-
Yadaiah and Anr. v. State of Telangana and
In the instant appeal, the resumption order concerning the assignment of non-occupied land in the 1960s to la ndless scheduled caste/scheduled tribe persons for the purpose of cultivation which was upheld by the…
- Prem Kishore & Ors. v. Brahm Prakash & Ors.
- Dept. v. M/S. K.L. Rathi Steels Ltd.
- S. Ramachandra Rao v. S. Nagabhushana Rao & Ors.
- V. Prakash @ G.N.V. Prakash v. M/S. P.S. Govindaswamy Naidu & Sons’ Charities Represented by Its Managing Trustee & Ors.
- Sathyanath & Anr. v. Sarojamani
- Loop Telecom and Trading Limited v. Union of India and Anr.
- K. Arumuga Velaiah v. P.R. Ramasamy and Anr.
- National Confederation of Officers Association of Central Public Sector Enterprises and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
- The Jamia Masjid v. Sri K V Rudrappa (Since Dead) by Lrs. & Ors.
- Ebix Singapore Private Limited v. Committee of Creditors of Educomp Solutions Limited & Anr.
- Union of India & Anr. v. S. Narasimhulu Naidu (Dead) Through Lrs. and Ors.
- Srihari Hanumandas Totala v. Hemant Vithal Kamat & Ors.
- Satish Chander Ahuja v. Sneha Ahuja
- V. Kalyanaswamy (D) by Lrs. & Anr. v. L. Bakthavatsalam (D) by Lrs. & Ors.
- Kantaru Rajeevaru v. Indian Young Lawyers Association Thr. Its General Secretary and Ors.
- Yashwant Sinha & Ors. v. Central Bureau of Investigation Through Its Director & Anr.
- M Siddiq (D) Thr Lrs v. V. Mahant Suresh Das & Ors
- The State of Maharashtra and Others v. M/S Moti Ratan Estate and Another
- Pramod Kumar & Anr. v. Zalak Singh & Ors.
- Chairman and Managing Director,The Fertilizers and Chemicals Tranvancore Ltd. & Anr. v. General Secretary Fact Employees Association & Ors.
- Asgar & Ors. v. Mohan Varma & Ors.
- Govindammal (Dead) by Lrs. and Ors. v. Vaidiyanathan and Ors.
- Mar Koorilos (Dead) and Anr. Etc. v. M. Pappy (Dead) and Another Etc.
- Mr. Anurag Mittal v. Mrs. Shaily Mishra Mittal
- Canara Bank v. N. G. Subbaraya Setty & Anr.
- Andanur Kalamma and Ors. v. Gangamma (Dead) by L.Rs.
- K. S. Varghese & Ors. v. St. Peters & Pauls Syrian Orth. & Ors.
- Vipulbhai Mansingbhai Chaudhary v. State of Gujarat & Another
- Satyendra Kumar & Ors. v. Raj Nath Dubey & Ors.
- Ajay Arjun Slngh v. Sharadendu Tiwari & Others
- Sri Jagannath Temple Managing Committee v. Siddha Math & Ors.
- Neon Laboratories Ltd. v. Medical Technologies Ltd. & Ors.
- The City Municipal Council Bhalki, by Its Chief Officer v. Gurappa (D) by Lrs. & Anr.
- Vaishaggarwal Panchayat v. Inder Kumar and Others
- Raveesh Chand Jain v. Raj Rani Jain
- Anil S/O Jagannath Rana and Others v. Rajendra S/O Radhakishan Rana and Others
- Sri Gangai Vinayagar Temple & Anr. v. Meenakshi Ammal & Ors.
- Surjit Singh & Ors. v. Gurwant Kaur & Ors.
- Purshottam Das Tandon Dead by Lrs. v. Military Estate Officer & Ors.
- Shiv Chander More & Ors. v. Lieutenant Governor & Ors.
- Dr. Subramanian Swamy v. State of Tamil Nadu & Ors.
- Erach Boman Khavar v. Tukaram Shridhar Bhat and Another
- Union of India & Anr. v. Ashok Kumar Aggarwal
- State of Gujarat & Another v. Manoharsinhji Pradyumansinhji Jadeja
- Rajan Purohit & Ors. v. Rajasthan University of Health Science & Ors.
- M. Nagabhushana v. State of Karnataka & Others
- Omprakash Verma & Ors. v. State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors.
- N. Suresh Nathan & Ors., Etc. Etc. v. Union of India & Ors. Etc. Etc.
- S.R. Srinavasa and Ors. v. S. Padmavathamma
- State of A.P. v. Hyderabad Potteries Pvt. Ltd & Anr.
- Chittoor Chegaiah & Ors. v. Pedda Jeeyangar Mutt & Anr.
- S. Nagaraj (Dead) by Lrs. & Ors. v. B.R. Vasudeva Murthy & Ors. Etc. Etc.