Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 · Chapter I: Suits in General · Place of suing
Section 25: Power of Supreme Court to transfer suits, etc
In plain words
On a party's application by motion with affidavit, the Supreme Court can, if expedient for justice, transfer any suit, appeal or proceeding from a court in one State to a court in another State. The receiving court can retry it or continue from that stage, applying the law the original court should have applied.
- A frivolous or vexatious applicant can be ordered to pay up to two thousand rupees compensation to the opposing party.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
(1) On the application of a party, and after notice to the parties, and after hearing such of them as desire to be heard, the Supreme Court may, at any stage, if satisfied that an order under this section is expedient for the ends of justice, direct that any suit, appeal or other proceeding be transferred from a High Court or other Civil Court in one State to a High Court or other Civil Court in another State.
(2) Every application under this section shall be made by a motion which shall be supported by an affidavit.
(3) The Court to which such suit, appeal or other proceeding is transferred shall, subject to any special directions in the order of transfer, either retry it or proceed from the stage at which it was transferred to it.
(4) In dismissing any application under this section, the Supreme Court may, if it is of opinion that the application was frivolous or vexatious, order the applicant to pay by way of compensation to any person who has opposed the application such sum, not exceeding two thousand rupees, as it considers appropriate in the circumstances of the case.
(5) The law applicable to any suit, appeal or other proceeding transferred under this section shall be the law which the Court in which the suit, appeal or other proceeding was originally instituted ought to have applied to such suit, appeal or proceeding.]
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 15 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 25
-
M/s Shri Sendhur Agro & Oil Industries v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.
Issue arose whether a complaint filed u/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, can be ordered to be transferred from one court to the other having territorial jurisdiction to try the offence in exercise of powers…
-
Rinku Baheti v. Sandesh Sharda
Issue arose whether the petitioner-wife is entitled to the transfer of the divorce petition; and whether this Court, upon the application filed by the respondent-husband, can exercise its powers u/Art. 142(1) of the…
-
Dolly Rani v. Manish Kumar Chanchal
When the marriage ceremony had not been performed in accordance with section 7 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, whether registration of such a marriage under section 8 of the 1955 Act would confer any legitimacy to it.
- Union of India v. M/S Pnsc Infrastructure Pvt Ltd
- Delma Lubna Coelho v. Edmond Clint Fernandes
- Shah Newaz Khan v. State of Nagaland
- M/S Exl Careers and Another v. Frankfinn Aviation Services Private Limited
- Santhini v. Vijaya Venketesh
- Shayara Bano v. Union of India and Others
- Krishna Veni Nagam v. Harish Nagam
- Anita Kushwaha v. Pushap Sudan
- Bhiaru Ram and Ors. v. Central Bureau of Investigation and Ors.
- D.A.V. Boys Sr. Sec. School Etc. Etc. v. Dav College Managing Commitiee
- Vinisha Jitesh Tolani @ Manmeet Laghmani v. Jitesh Kishore Tolani
- Balaji Coke Industry Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S Mm Bhagwati Coke (Guj) Pvt. Ltd.
- Nahar Industrial Enterprises Ltd. v. Hong Kong & Shanghai Banking Corporation
- Durgesh Sharma v. Jayshree
- Ajendraprasadji N. Pande and Anr. v. Swami Keshav Prakeshdasji N. and Ors.
- M/S Gupte Cardiac Care Centre and Hospital v. Olympic Pharma Care Pvt. Ltd.
- M/S Hira Lall and Sons and Ors. v. M/S. Lakshmi Commercial Bank
- Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Jaipur v. Smt. Poonam Pahwa and Ors.
- M/S Bihar State Food and Supplies Corporation Ltd. v. M/S Godrej Soaps Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.
- Kartar Singh v. State of Punjab
- Dr. Subramaniam Swamy v. Ramakrishna Hegde
- Union of India & Anr. v. Shiromani Gurdwara Prabandhak Commitee & Ors.
- Guda Vijayalakshmi v. Guda Ramchandra Sekhara Sastry
- Indian Overseas Bank, Madras v. Chemical Construction Company & Ors
- Arvee Industries & Ors. v. Ratan Lal Sharma
- Ramlal, Motilal and Chhotelal v. Rewa Coalfields Ltd.