Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 · Chapter I: Suits in General · Place of suing
Section 16: Suits to be instituted where subject-matter situate
Subject to the pecuniary or other limitations prescribed by any law, suits
(a) for the recovery of immovable property with or without rent or profits,
(b) for the partition of immovable property,
(c) for foreclosure, sale or redemption in the case of a mortgage of or charge upon immovable property,
(d) or the determination of any other right to or interest in immovable property,
(e) for compensation for wrong to immovable property,
(f) for the recovery of movable property actually under distraint or attachment,
shall be instituted in the Court within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the property is situate:
Provided that a suit to obtain relief respecting, or compensation for wrong to, immovable property held by or on behalf of the defendant may, where the relief sought can be entirely obtained through his personal obedience, be instituted either in the Court within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the property is situate, or in the Court within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the defendant actually and voluntarily resides, or carries on business, or personally works for gain.
Explanation.— In this section "property" means property situate in [India].
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 15 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 16
-
Saroj Salkan v. Huma Singh & Ors.
Matter pertains to the correctness of the dismissal of the partition suit u/Ord.XII r.6 CPC by the Single Judge of the High Court based on the admission, and that too on its own motion without an application being filed…
-
Rohit Kochhar v. Vipul Infrastructure Developers Ltd. & Ors.
Whether the relief sought by the plaintiff in respect to the suit property can be entirely obtained through the personal obedience of the defendants warranting the application of the proviso to Section 16 of the Code of…
-
M/S Arif Azim Co. Ltd. v. M/S Micromax Informatics Fze
(a) Whether the present petition under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 maintainable in India; (b) whether seat of arbitration designated under the aforesaid Distributorship Agreement is in…
- Mankastu Impex Private Limited v. Airvisual Limited
- Bgs Sgs Soma Jv v. Nhpc Ltd.
- Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd. v. K. S. Infraspace Llp & Anr.
- River Pellets Limited v. Kamachi Industries Limited
- Shivnarayan (D) by Lrs. v. Maniklal (D) Thr. Lrs. & Ors.
- M/S Emkay Global Financial Services Ltd. v. Girdhar Sondhi
- Indus Mobile Distribution Private Limited v. Datawind Innovations Private Limited & Ors.
- Executive Engineer, Road Development Division No.Ill, Panvel & Anr. v. Atlanta Limited
- Vidur Impex and Traders Pvt. Ltd. and Others v. Tosh Apartments Pvt. Ltd. and Others
- Balaji Coke Industry Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S Mm Bhagwati Coke (Guj) Pvt. Ltd.
- Nahar Industrial Enterprises Ltd. v. Hong Kong & Shanghai Banking Corporation
- Sumesh Singh v. Phoolan Devi & Ors.
- Chief Engineer, Hydel Project & Ors. v. Ravinder Nath & Ors.
- Jatinder v. M/S. Chopra Land Dev. P. Ltd. and Anr.
- State Bank of Hyderabad v. Town Municipal Council
- Jindal Vijayanagar Steel (Jsw Steel Ltd.) v. Jindal Praxair Oxygen Company Ltd.
- Harshad Chiman Lal Modi v. D.L.F. Universal Ltd. and Anr.
- Harshad Chiman Lal Modi v. D.L.F., Universal Ltd. and Anr.