VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Manipur High Court 2024 › High Court of Manipur

Chairman Council of Higher Secondary Education Manipur v. Beoncy Laishram and 5 Others

Closed
Court
High Court of Manipur
Decided
21 August 2024
Bench
Ahanthem Bimol Singhauthor
Case no.
MC(WP(C)) 429/2024

Follow Manipur High CourtFollow Ahanthem Bimol Singh

Judgment

MC(WP(C)) No. 483 of 2024 Beoncy Laishram

State of Manipur & ors.

Heard Mr. Kiyeka, learned counsel appearing for the applicant; Mr. Phungyo Zingkhai, learned Deputy GA appearing for the respondents No. 1 and 2, Mr. I. Denning, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 3 and Mr. L. Raju, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 4. Heard also, Ms. Tanya, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 5. None appeared for the respondent No. 6.

The present application has been filed seeking amendment of the cause tile of the connected petition being WP(C) No. 392 of 2024 as proposed in para. 4 of the present application.

The counsel appearing for the respondents fairly submitted that they have no objection in allowing the present amendment application.

In view of the submission made by the counsel appearing for the parties, the present application is hereby allowed.

The counsel appearing for the applicant/ writ petitioner is directed to file a recast petition by incorporating the proposed amendment.

With the aforesaid direction, the present application is disposed of.

IN. 83 Date: 2024.08.22 15:02:28 MC(WP(C)) No. 457 of 2024 Chairman, Board of Secondary Education, Manipur

Beoncy Laishram & ors.

With MC(WP(C)) No. 457 of 2024; MC(WP(C)) No. 429 of 2024 & WP(C) No. 392 of 2024

Heard Mr. I. Denning, learned counsel appearing for the applicant; Mr. Kiyaka, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1, Mr. Phungyo Zingkhai, learned Deputy GA appearing for the State respondents, Mr. L. Raju, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 4 and Ms. Tanya, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 5.

Mr. I. Denning, learned counsel appearing for the applicant submitted that in view of the order passed today in the connected MC(WP(C)) No. 483 of 2024, the present application can be closed.

In view of the submission made above, the present application is hereby closed.

IN. 84 DEVANANDA SINGH Date: 2024.08.22 15:02:56 +05'30' MC(WP(C)) No. 429 of 2024 Chairman, Council of Higher Secondary Education, Manipur

Beoncy Laishram & ors.

Heard Mr. L. Raju, learned counsel appearing for the applicant; Mr. Kiyaka, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1, Mr. Phungyo Zingkhai, learned counsel appearing for the State respondents, Mr. I. Denning, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 4 and Ms. Tanya, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 5.

Mr. L. Raju, learned counsel appearing for the applicant submitted that in view of the order passed today in the connected MC(WP(C)) No. 483 of 2024, the present application can be closed.

In view of the submission made above, the present application is hereby closed.

IN. 85 Date: 2024.08.22 15:03:19 WP(C) No. 392 of 2024 Beoncy Laishram

… Petitioner State of Manipur & ors.

As prayed for by Mr. Kiyaka, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, list this case again on 24-09-2024.

IN. 86 Date: 2024.08.22 15:03:55

Source: High Court of Manipur, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.