- Court
- High Court of Meghalaya
- Decided
- 22 November 2023
- Bench
- H. S. Thangkhiew, Chief Justice (Acting), B. Bhattacharjee, Judge
- Case no.
- WP(C) 133/2020
Follow Meghalaya High CourtFollow H. S. ThangkhiewFollow Chief Justice (Acting)Follow B. Bhattacharjee
Judgment
Serial No. 01 Supplementary List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG
WP(C) No. 131 of 2020 with WP(C) No. 132 of 2020 WP(C) No. 133 of 2020 WP(C) No. 134 of 2020 WP(C) No. 135 of 2020 WP(C) No. 136 of 2020 WP(C) No. 137 of 2020 WP(C) No. 151 of 2020 WP(C) No. 152 of 2020 WP(C) No. 153 of 2020 WP(C) No. 154 of 2020 WP(C) No. 155 of 2020 WP(C) No. 156 of 2020 WP(C) No. 157 of 2020 WP(C) No. 173 of 2020 WP(C) No. 174 of 2020 WP(C) No. 175 of 2020 WP(C) No. 176 of 2020 WP(C) No. 177 of 2020 WP(C) No. 178 of 2020 WP(C) No. 179 of 2020 WP(C) No. 180 of 2020 WP(C) No. 181 of 2020 WP(C) No. 182 of 2020 WP(C) No. 183 of 2020 WP(C) No. 184 of 2020 WP(C) No. 185 of 2020 WP(C) No. 186 of 2020 WP(C) No. 226 of 2020 WP(C) No. 227 of 2020 WP(C) No. 228 of 2020 WP(C) No. 229 of 2020 WP(C) No. 230 of 2020
WP(C) No. 231 of 2020 WP(C) No. 232 of 2020 WP(C) No. 233 of 2020 WP(C) No. 241 of 2020 Date of Decision: 22.11.2023
M/s RNB Minerals and Chemicals vs. Union of India & 4 Ors. Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. M/s Vishal Saw Cum Veneer Mills vs. Union of India & 4 Ors. Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. M/s RNB Carbides and Ferro Alloys vs. Union of India & 4 Ors. Ltd. (Unit I) & Anr. M/s RNB Carbides and Ferro Alloys vs. Union of India & 4 Ors. Ltd. (Unit II). M/S Timber Craft and Veneer vs. Union of India & 4 Ors. Products (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. M/S RKB Cements Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India & 4 Ors. Green Valliey Industries Ltd. vs. Union of India & 4 Ors. M/s H.M. Cements Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. vs. Union of India & 3 Ors. Bhagwati Syndicate Private Ltd. vs. Union of India & 3 Ors. Pioneer Carbides Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. vs. Union of India & 4 Ors. Megha Technical and Engineers Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India & 4 Ors. Star Cement Ltd. vs. Union of India & 4 Ors. Maithan Alloys Ltd. vs. Union of India & 3 Ors. Shyam Century Ferrous Ltd. vs. Union of India & 3 Ors. M/s NTL Steels vs. Union of India & 4 Ors. M/s Ri Bhoi Ispat And Rolling Mills vs. Union of India & 4 Ors. M/s Hills Cement Company Ltd. vs. Union of India & 4 Ors. M/s Commercial Iron and Steel vs. Union of India & 4 Ors. Co. Pvt. Ltd. M/s Bimla Ispat and Alloys Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India & 4 Ors. M/s Khasi Alloys Ltd. And Anr. vs. Union of India & 4 Ors. M/s Shillong Ispat and Rolling Mills vs. Union of India & 4 Ors. M/s Virgo Cement Ltd. vs. Union of India & 4 Ors. M/s Nezone Alloys Ltd. vs. Union of India & 4 Ors. M/s Meghalaya Cast and Alloys Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India & 4 Ors.
Meghalaya Steels Ltd. vs. Union of India & 3 Ors. M/s Pawan Castings (Meghalaya) vs. Union of India & 4 Ors. Pvt. Ltd. M/s Greystone Ispat Ltd. vs. Union of India & 4 Ors. M/s Nalari Ferro Alloys Ltd. vs. Union of India & 4 Ors. M/s Nezone Industries Ltd. vs. Union of India & 4 Ors. M/s Billennium Cement Ltd. vs. Union of India & 4 Ors. M/s Shivani Ispat and Rolling Mills vs. Union of India & 4 Ors. Pvt. Ltd. Meghalaya Mineral Products vs. Union of India & 3 Ors. M/s F.W. Ferro Tech Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India & 4 Ors. Meghalaya Cements Limited vs. Union of India & 4 Ors. M/s Greystone Smelters Ltd. vs. Union of India & 4 Ors. M/s Jud Cements Ltd. vs. Union of India & 4 Ors. Anabond Ltd. vs. Union of India & 4 Ors.
Coram:
Hon'ble Mr. Justice H.S. Thangkhiew, Chief Justice (Acting)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge
Appearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s): Dr. A.K. Saraf, Sr Adv. with
Mr. S.Chanda, Adv.
For the Respondent(s) : Dr. N. Mozika, DSGI with
Ms. A. Pradhan, Adv.
JUDGMENT: Per H.S. Thangkhiew, Chief Justice (Acting) (Oral)
¶1These batch of writ petitions being identical and similar are being disposed of by this common order and judgment. The writ petitions have been filed challenging show-cause/demand/recovery notices issued by the respondent No. 4, directing for payment/return of the Cess and Secondary
and Higher Secondary Cess along with interest, which had been refunded to the petitioners. The demand it appears was on the ground that the said refund was erroneous, and made on the basis of a direction of this Court dated 15.10.2018, following the decision of the Supreme Court dated
10.11.2017, passed in SRD Nutrients Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, which had been subsequently overturned, vide order dated 06.12.2019, passed in the case of M/s Unicorn Industries vs. Union of India.
¶2The question raised in these petitions is whether the respondents are entitled to issue the impugned notices for return of the said Cess, since earlier it had been refunded on the basis of then valid law, as laid down by the Supreme Court. Thereafter, when the matters were taken up for final consideration, it was reported to this Court that, the same issue was pending before the Supreme Court, and as such, all these matters were adjourned on many dates, to await the outcome thereof.
¶3The matters before the Supreme Court were then disposed of vide order dated 04.07.2022, whereby the subsequent decision of the Supreme Court overruling SRD Nutrients (supra) in the case of M/s Unicorn Industries (supra), was held, to not have any bearing on past decisions,
which attained finality. The entire order being relevant for the purposes of these cases is reproduced herein below.
¶4As such, the matter having attained finality, these writ petitions are disposed of, and accordingly the show-cause/demand/recovery notices appearing in all these connected writ petitions stand quashed and set aside.
¶5No order as to costs.
(B. Bhattacharjee) (H.S. Thangkhiew)
Judge Chief Justice (Acting)
Meghalaya
22.11.2023 "D.Thabah-PS"
Source: High Court of Meghalaya, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.