VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

D.Vijayakumar v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
19 February 2026
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor, B.Pugalendhi
Case no.
WP(MD) 34656/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow G.R.SwaminathanFollow B.Pugalendhi

Judgment

ORDER Heard both sides.

2.The petitioner is a resident of Erumarpatti Village. He alleges that the respondents 9 and 10 have put up a number of electric poles in the petition mentioned river. Since the river in question vests with the Water Resources Department, the respondents 9 and 10 will have to obtain permission only from the said Department and not from any other authority. The respondents 9 and 10 have already submitted applications to the third respondent.

3.We direct the third respondent to consider the said applications and take a decision in terms of G.O(Ms)No.101 dated 13.09.2024. Until an appropriate decision is taken by the competent authority, poles put up by the respondents 9 and 10 shall not be removed. Their fate shall abide by the decision to be taken by the competent authority. The respondents 9 and 10 shall not erect any further poles without getting prior permission from the competent authority. No further civil work also shall also be carried out by the respondents 9 and 10 in the meanwhile. The competent authority shall decide the issue within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

4.This Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

[G.R.S., J.] [B.P., J.]

19.02.2026

NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No MGA To

1.The District Collector,

2.The Superintending Engineer, Special Project Circle, Palani - 624 601, Dindigul District.

3.The Executive Engineer, Nanganjiyar Basin Division, Palani - 624 601, Dindigul District.

4.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Kodaganar Sub Division, Vedasandur - 624 710,

5.The Assistant Engineer, Kodaganar Dam Section, Alagapuri - 624 710, Vedasandur Taluk,

6.The District Revenue Officer,

7.The Revenue Divisional Officer,

8.The Tahsildar, Aravakurichi Post and Taluk, Karur District. G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J and

B.PUGALENDHI, J. MGA

19.02.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI D.Vijayakumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, 2.The Superintending Engineer, Special Project Circle, Palani - 624 601, 3.The Executive Engineer, Nanganjiyar Basin Division, Palani - 624 601, 4.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Kodaganar Sub Division, Vedasandur - 624 710, 5.The Assistant Engineer, Kodaganar Dam Section, Alagapuri - 624 710, Vedasandur Taluk, 6.The District Revenue Officer, 7.The Revenue Divisional Officer, 8.The Tahsildar, Aravakurichi Post and Taluk, Karur District. 9.The Project Manager, JSP @ Jindal Green Win Private Limited, P.T.M Complex, 69/6 - Care Nagar, Dharapuram Main Road, Aravakurichy Post - 639 201, Karur District. 10.The Managing Director, K.S.Wird Rerewables India Private Limited, No.40, Visalakshi Street, Aiswary's Garden, Poonamalle, Chennai - 600 056. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 8 to remove the encroachment made by the 9th and 10th respondent in S.No.223 of Eremarpatty Village, Aravakuruchi Taluk, Karur District at once. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian For Respondents : Mr.C.Venkatesh Kumar Special Government Pleader for R.1 to R.8 Mr.M.Jerin Mathew for R.9 & R.10

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.