VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

B.Senthamilselvi v. The District Collector/Monitoring Committee

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
20 August 2026
Bench
M.Dhandapani, N.Dilip Kumarauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 24225/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow M.DhandapaniFollow N.Dilip Kumar

Judgment

O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by M.DHANDAPANI, J.) This Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing respondents 1 to 4 to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation/reply dated 05.08.2026, submitted in response to the Show Cause Notice issued by the fourth respondent under Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 (Act III of 1905), in respect of the land comprised in S.No.122/102, measuring an extent of 0.15.15 Ares, situated at Panayapuram Village, Srirangam Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District and consequently, direct respondents 1 to 3 to make consequential entries/updation in the revenue records and village accounts, upon payment of the applicable land revenue/land tax (Theervai) by the petitioner.

¶2Heard the learned counsel for the parties. By consent of both parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.

3.The petitioner claims that the petition-mentioned property is an ancestral property and that, though the petitioner along with her family has been residing therein for several decades, the Revenue Authorities have not considered her request seeking issuance of patta. The grievance of the petitioner is that, without considering the classification of the property, the fourth respondent had issued a show-cause notice dated 30.07.2026, alleging that the petitioner is in unauthorised occupation and calling upon her to submit her explanation to the said show-cause notice. The petitioner submitted a reply dated 05.08.2026 to the respondents 1 to 4. The grievance of the petitioner is that, despite the reply submitted by her, the authorities have neither conducted a proper enquiry nor passed a reasoned order. Hence, the petitioner has been constrained to file the present Writ Petition.

¶4The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that it would suffice if this Court issues a direction to the respondents 1 to 4 to consider the petitioner's reply dated 05.08.2026 and pass appropriate orders thereon, on merits and in accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶5The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the official respondents, on instructions, would submit that the authority concerned will consider the petitioner's grievance and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law.

¶6Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner's reply dated 05.08.2026 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law. Such exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. [M.D.I.,J.] & [N.D.K.,J.]

20.08.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes PKN To

¶1The District Collector/Monitoring Committee, Tiruchirappalli District, Collectorate, Tiruchirappalli 620 001.

¶2The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Srirangam Division, Tiruchirappalli District 620 009.

¶3The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Srirangam Taluk, Srirangam, Tiruchirappalli District 620 006.

¶4The Revenue Inspector, Panayapuram Village, Srirangam Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District 620 006. M.DHANDAPANI

, J.

and

N.DILIP KUMAR, J. PKN

20.08.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.08.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.DILIP KUMAR B.Senthamilselvi ... Petitioner vs. 1. The District Collector/Monitoring Committee, Tiruchirappalli District, Collectorate, Tiruchirappalli 620 001. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Srirangam Division, Tiruchirappalli District 620 009. 3. The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Srirangam Taluk, Srirangam, Tiruchirappalli District 620 006. 4. The Revenue Inspector, Panayapuram Village, Srirangam Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District 620 006. ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 to consider and dispose of the petitioner representation/reply dated 05.08.2026, submitted in response to the Show Cause Notice issued by the 4th Respondent under Section 7 of The Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 (Act III of 1905), in respect of the land comprised in S.No. 122/102, measuring an extent of 0.15.15 Ares, situated at Panayapuram Village, Srirangam Taluk, Tiruchirappalli consequential District, and consequently direct the Respondents 1 to 3 to make consequential entries / updation in the revenue records and village accounts, upon payment of the applicable land revenue/land tax (Theervai) by the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr. C.Abul Kalam Azad For Respondents : Mr.G.Mohan Kumar (R1 to R4) Special Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.