R.S. Ramasamy v. State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, Vadipatti

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 12/06/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL

¶1R.S. Ramasamy, S/o.Singama Reddy, No.1/89 Middle Street, Ramaiyanpatti, Katchiakatti, Vadipatti, Madurai..

¶2A. Sadaiyandi,, S/o.Arumugam, No.1/159 East Street, Chokkalingapuram, Vadipatti, Madurai.. ... petitioners/Accused Rank Not Known Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Vadipatti Police Station, Vadipatti Taluk, Madurai District. Crime No. 152 of 2026.. ... Respondent/Complainant For petitioners : Mr.S.Ramsundarvijayraj for M/s. Veera Associates, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.G.Ganesh Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- C-33AB. For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 152 of 2026 on the file of the respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent for the offences punishable under Section 303(2) of BNS, 2023, and Section 21(4) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, in Crime No.152 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that on

25.05.2026, the Police personnel along with the respondent Police were on patrol duty, at that time, they found that the petitioners and other accused persons had illegally transported mineral stones by using Tipper bearing Registration No. TN 24 AB 5738 without any valid permission. Hence, the case.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and they were falsely implicated in this case and they are no way connected in the above said incident. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police would submit that the petitioners had illegally transported

mineral

stones

without

any permission. He would further submit that the petitioners have no previous cases. However, he opposes to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

¶5Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

¶6Considering the rival submissions on either side and the nature of offences charged against the petitioners and the quantity of the materials involved in this case, and also considering the fact that the petitioners have no previous cases and the materials have been seized and the material part of the investigation might have been completed and hence, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, subject to the following conditions: [a] Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made reay, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vadipatti, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that: [b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police once in a week ie., on Every Saturday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. [c] the petitioners shall not commit any offences of similar nature. [d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions,

the

learned

Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S. (P D B J)

12.06.2026 vsg TO

1.The learned Judicial Magistrate, Vadipatti.

2.The Inspector of Police, Vadipatti Police Station, Vadipatti Taluk, Madurai District.

¶3The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. CRLeOP(MD).eNo.10883eofe2026 eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee eP.eDHANABAL,J., vsg eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeORDER eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeIN eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeCRLeOP(MD)eNo.10883eofe2026 eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeDateee:e12/06/2026