VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

A.Raja Nakkeeran v. The Inspector General of Registration

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
5 June 2026
Bench
D.Bharatha Chakravarthyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 14886/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow D.Bharatha Chakravarthy

Judgment

ORDER The Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the third respondent to register the sale deed dated 13.05.2022 presented by the petitioner.

¶2The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the sale deed was kept pending and was not acted upon solely on the ground that the patta had not been mutated in favour of the petitioner. According to the learned counsel, the patta has since been mutated; however, the document has not been entertained for registration and was ultimately returned to the petitioner.

¶3Per contra, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that the document was originally presented on 13.05.2022 and was kept pending under Reference No.61 of 2022. Thereafter, a refusal order came to be passed. However, the petitioner collected the refused document only on

10.03.2026.

¶4I have considered the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record.

¶5On a query raised by this Court, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the vendor has no objection whatsoever to the registration of the document.

¶6In view of the above, and considering that the refusal was made solely on the ground that the patta had not been mutated, and it is now represented that the mutation has since been effected, the refusal order shall stand set aside. The petitioner is permitted to re-present the document along with the mutated patta and an affidavit from the vendor expressing his no-objection to the registration of the document.

¶7Upon such re-presentation, the third respondent/Sub Registrar shall conduct an enquiry by securing the presence of both the vendor and the purchaser. If there is no other legal impediment for registration, the document shall be registered in accordance with law.

¶8The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

05.06.2026 NCC : No smn2 To:-

1.The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Mylapore, Chennai-28.

2.The District Registrar,, Trichirappalli District Registration Office, Trichy.

3.The Sub Registrar Joint - I, Trichirappalli District Registration Office, Trichy. D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

, J.

smn2

05.06.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.06.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.Raja Nakkeeran ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Mylapore, Chennai-28. 2.The District Registrar,, Trichirappalli District Registration Office, Trichy. 3.The Sub Registrar Joint - I, Trichirappalli District Registration Office, Trichy. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent to register the petitioner's sale deed dated 13.05.2022 and consider the petitioner's representation dated 13.05.2026. For Petitioner : Mr.A.V.Rajasekaran For Respondents : Mr.S.Vashik Ali Standing Counsel

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.