VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

V.Priya Benazir v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
12 March 2026
Bench
S Justice S.Srimathyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 6686/2026

Judgment

O R D E R The Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 17.02.2026 and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to issue the patta in Survey No.81/1A to an extent of 980 sq ft Thanakkankulam Village, Madurai District within the time frame stipulated by this Court.

¶2The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner purchased the property from M. Duraipandi through a registered sale deed bearing Doc. No. 3729 of 2014, dated 04.06.2014, in Survey No. 81/1A, measuring an extent of 980 sq. ft. It was further submitted that the said survey number had been subdivided into several plots and sold to multiple persons, all of whom have obtained patta. Therefore, the petitioner is seeking transfer of patta in his name.

¶3The learned Additional Government Pleader submitted that the survey has to be conducted thereafter patta would be issued.

¶4Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court directs the 3rd respondent to conduct the survey with assistance of the surveyor and thereafter, shall issue patta as per the manner known to law. The Court is also directing the Official respondents to adhere to the following Standard Operating Procedures: a. The Official respondents shall issue notice to the petitioner immediately reaching the spot where survey is to be conducted. The petitioner shall affix the signature by receiving the notice of survey. b. After survey again the petitioner shall affix signature indicating that the survey was conducted to their satisfaction.

c. If the petitioner is not satisfied, then also the petitioner shall affix signature indicating their dissatisfaction or with protest. The petitioner shall indicate that reason of their dissatisfaction or protest.

The aforesaid procedure shall be strictly followed by the parties The said exercise shall be completed within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶5With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

12.03.2026 Index : Yes / No

Internet : Yes NCC : Yes / No

msrm To

¶1The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Madurai District.

¶2The Revenue Divisional Officer, Collectorate, Madurai District.

¶3The Tahsildar, Thiruparankundram Taluk, Thanakankulam Village, Madurai District.

¶4The Additional Government Pleader, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai S.SRIMATHY, J msrm

12.03.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.03.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY V.Priya Benazir ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Madurai District. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Collectorate, Madurai District. 3. The Tahsildar, Thiruparankundram Taluk, Thanakkankulam Village, Madurai District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 17.02.2026 and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to issue the patta in Survey No.81/1A to an extent of 980 sq ft Thanakkankulam Village, Madurai District within the time frame stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Senthil Kumar For Respondents : Mr.S.Shanmugavel Additional Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.