VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Ganesh.S v. The District Collector

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
20 January 2026
Bench
R.Vijayakumarauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 6749/2022

Follow Madras High CourtFollow R.Vijayakumar

Judgment

O R D E R The present writ petition has been filed to quash the order passed by the third respondent in O.Mu.No.3576/A1/2021 dated 09.02.2022, wherein the request of the petitioner to approve him as Secretary of the Thirugnanasampanthar Middle School, Puliyankudi, has been rejected.

¶2A perusal of the order impugned in this writ petition reveals that three proceedings are pending before the court, namely, W.P.(MD)No.15831 of 2021 before this High Court, S.L.P. (C).No.30848 of 2016 before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and another writ petition in W.P.(MD) No.15398 of 2020 before this Court. Therefore, the request of the petitioner to approve his secretaryship cannot be considered.

¶3The learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner points out that S.L.P.

(C) No.30848 of 2016 was disposed of by the Hon'ble Supreme Court on

01.05.2023. He further submits that W.P.No.15398 of 2020 has also been disposed of on 05.10.2023. According to him, W.P.(MD)No.15831 of 2021 has also been disposed of. Therefore, there is no legal impediment as on date to consider his representation to approve his secretaryship.

¶4The learned counsel appearing for the fourth respondent submits that in case any fresh proposal is submitted by the writ petitioner to the third respondent, his objections may be considered.

¶5In view of the abovesaid facts, the order impugned in this writ petition is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the file of the third respondent. The petitioner is at liberty to submit a fresh proposal to the third respondent seeking approval for the secretaryship. In case any such application/proposal is received, the third respondent is directed to hear the objections raised by the fourth respondent herein and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law.

¶6With the said observations, this Writ Petition is allowed. No costs.

20.01.2026 NCC : Yes/No

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No apd To

1.The District Collector Collectorate Office, Tenkasi.

2.The Chief Educational Office Tenkasi.

3.The District Educational Office, District Educational Office, Sankarankovil, Tenkasi. R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J. apd W.P(MD)No.6749 of 2022

20.01.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.01.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR W.P(MD)No.6749 of 2022 S.Ganesh ... Petitioner vs 1.The District Collector Collectorate Office, Tenkasi. 2.The Chief Educational Office Tenkasi. 3.The District Educational Office, District Educational Office, Sankarankovil, Tenkasi. 4.I.Chidambram ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the third respondent in O.Mu.No. 3576/A1/2021 dated 09.02.2022 and quash the same and to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to approve the petitioner as the Secretary in Thirugnanasampanthar Middle School, Puliyankudi, Kadayanallur Taluk, Tenkasi District on the basis of resolution passed by School Committee of the above said school. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Meenakshi Sundaram Senior Counsel for Mr.R.T.Arivukumar For Respondents : Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R3 Mr.V.Meenakshi Sundaram for R4 *****

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.