Kannan v. State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, Thirumangalam Taluk

ORDER The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 132, 118(1), 109 and 351(3) of BNS Act, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant is a police official who was in bandobust duty along with other police officials, due to communal dispute, the accused persons assembled unlawfully and voluntarily causing hurt, and attempted to commit culpable homicide and obstructing the public servants from discharging their officials duties. Hence, a case has been registered as against the petitioner.

¶3The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and they have not committed any offence. He seeks this Court to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) appearing for the respondent submitted that it is a case and case in counter and the co-accused were already granted anticipatory bail.

¶5Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the nature of offences and it is a case and case in counter, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

¶6Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of The Judicial Magistrate Court, Thirumangalam, within a period of fifteen days from the date when the order copy made ready and on further conditions that: [a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity. [b]the petitioners shall appear before the respondent Police as and when required for interrogation. [c]the petitioners shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d]the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner is released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f]If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.

27.02.2026 KSA TO

1.The Inspector of Police, Thirumangalam Taluk Police Station, Madurai District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench Of Madras High Court, Madurai.

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 27.02.2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL OP(MD)No. 4559 of 2026 1. Kannan 2. Karuppu @ Karuppiah 3. Alaguraja 4. Balusamy 5. Nagapandi @ Nagapandian 6. Thevaraja @ Devaraj 7. Kannan @ Kamatchi Kannan 8. Pravinkumar @ Pradeep 9. Prabhu 10. Marikannan 11. Muthukannan 12. Arivarasan 13. Sathish @ Satheeshkumar ...Petitioners Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Inspector of Police, Thirumangalam Taluk Police Station, Madurai District. (Crime No. 39 of 2026 ) ... Respondent For Petitioners : Mr.R.Manoharan For Respondent : Mr.S.S.Manoj Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No. 39 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police.