R.Murugesan v. State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, Peravurani

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 27/02/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY R.Murugesan ... Petitioner/Accused

Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Peravurani Police Station, Thanjavur District. Crime No.68 of 2026. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.S.Prabha, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.68 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 01.02.2026 for the offences punishable under Section 74 of BNS Act, 2023 and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, in Crime No.68 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

¶2The prosecution case is that on 30.01.2026, while the defacto complainant was undergoing medical treatment as an inpatient in the Emergency Ward of the Government Hospital, Pervurani, the petitioner touched her and misbehaved with her. Hence, the complaint.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody from 01.02.2026. Hence, he seeks bail to the petitioner.

¶4The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that while the defacto complainant was undergoing medical treatment as an inpatient in the Emergency Ward of the Government Hospital, Pervurani, the petitioner touched her and misbehaved with her. Therefore, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶5Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the period of incarceration suffered by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions:

¶6Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pervurani, Thanjavur District, and on further conditions that :- [a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity. [b] the petitioner shall stay at Trichy and report before the Inspector of Police, Cantonment Police Station, Trichy, daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. The petitioner shall not intimidate or threaten the defacto complainant. [c] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner is released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS. (S S Y J)

27.02.2026 jbr TO

¶1The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pervurani, Thanjavur District.

¶2The Superintendent, Sub Jail, Pudukkottai.

¶3The Inspector of Police, Peravurani Police Station, Thanjavur District.

¶4The Inspector of Police, Cantonment Police Station, Trichy

¶5The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. S.SRIMATHY,J jbr ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.2565 of 2026 Date : 27/02/2026