- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 18 March 2026
- Bench
- S Justice T.V.Thamilselvi
- Case no.
- CRP 5662/2025
Judgment
ORDER This Civil Revision petition has been filed to set aside the order dated
13.08.2025 passed in IA No. 247 of 2024 in OS No. 35 of 2022, on the file of the Hon'ble Principal District Munsiff Court, Thittagudi.
2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner filed IA No.247 of 2024 in O.S. No.35 of 2022 on the file of the Honble Principal District Munsiff Court, Thittagudi seeking for to condone the delay of 257 days in filing the restore application and the same was allowed on condition of payment of Rs.1,000/- payable to the respondents 1 and 2 on or before
02.09.2025. vide order dated 13.08.2025. As per the order of the Trial Court, Page3 of 6 the petitioner has paid the cost of Rs.1000/- on 01.09.2025 to the respondents 1 and 2 and complied with the said order. However, the petitioner has not filed a memo for compliance of the Trial Court order. Hence, the condone delay application filed by the petitioner has automatically been dismissed as he failed to comply with the order dated 13.08.2025 on or before 02.09.2026.
¶3The learned counsel for the respondents would submit that even though the respondents 1 and 2 have received the cost of Rs.1000/- and they have endorsed the same accordingly, the petitioner has not filed a memo for complying the order dated 13.08.2025 before the Trial Court. Hence, the condone delay application has been automatically dismissed.
¶4Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
¶5On perusal of the records, it is seen that the petitioner has paid the cost of Rs.1000/- on 01.09.2025 and an endorsement has been made accordingly. However, the petitioner failed to file a memo before the Trial Court for recording the same. Due to the procedural lapse, the right of the petitioner cannot be deprived. Hence, the condone delay application in I.A.No.247 of 2024 is ordered to be allowed. Page4 of 6
6.In the result, this Civil Revision Petition is allowed as prayed for. No costs. 18-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Lbm Page5 of 6 To
¶1Kolanjiammal W/o. Periyasamy, Residing at Podaiyur Village, New Colony, Thittagudi Taluk, Cuddalore District.
¶2Periya Samy S/o. Sellamuthu, Residing at Podaiyur Village, New Colony, Thittagudi Taluk, Cuddalore District.
¶3The Village Administrative Officer, Podaiyur Village Office, Thittagudi Taluk, Cuddalore District.
¶4The Revenue Divisional Officer Thittagudi Taluk, Cuddalore District.
¶5The Special Tahsildhar Adi-Dravidar Welfare, Thittagudi Taluk, Cuddalore District.
¶6The Sub Collector Virudhachalam Office, Cuddalore District.
¶7The District Collector Cuddalore Office, Cuddalore District. Page6 of 6 T.V.THAMILSELVI J. Lbm 18-03-2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI Jayanthi D/o. Rajamanikam, Podaiyur Village, New Colony, Thittagudi Taluk, Cuddalore District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Kolanjiammal W/o. Periyasamy, Residing at Podaiyur Village, New Colony, Thittagudi Taluk, Cuddalore District. 2. Periya Samy S/o. Sellamuthu, Residing at Podaiyur Village, New Colony, Thittagudi Taluk, Cuddalore District. 3. The Village Administrative Officer, Podaiyur Village Office, Thittagudi Taluk, Cuddalore District. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer Thittagudi Taluk, Cuddalore District. 5. The Special Tahsildhar Adi-Dravidar Welfare, Thittagudi Taluk, Cuddalore District. 6. The Sub Collector Virudhachalam Office, Cuddalore District. ..Respondent(s) Page2 of 6 7. The District Collector Cuddalore Office, Cuddalore District. To set aside the order dated 13.08.2025 passed in IA No. 247 of 2024 in OS No. 35 of 2022, on the file of the Honble Principal District Munsiff Court, Thittagudi. For Petitioner(s): Ms.R.Swetha For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Sathish Government Advocate For R3 To R9 Mr.A.Raja Perumal For R1 & R2
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.