- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 20 August 2026
- Bench
- N.Ramesh
- Case no.
- CRL OP 23270/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow N.Ramesh
Judgment
ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on
15.06.2026 for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 9(m) and 10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, in Crime No.28 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. Page2 of 6
¶2The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant, who is the mother of the victim girl aged about 7 years, lodged a complaint alleging that while her daughter was playing, the petitioner touched her in an inappropriate manner. Hence, the case.
¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner has been in judicial custody since
15.06.2026 and he is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for the grant of bail to the petitioner.
¶4The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent strongly opposed the grant of bail to the petitioner. He submitted that the petitioner has committed a heinous offence against a 7-year-old child under the POCSO Act. He further submitted that if the petitioner is released on bail, he may threaten the victim girl and her family members. Hence, he prayed for the dismissal of the bail petition.
¶5Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the State and perused the materials available on record. Page3 of 6
¶6Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of the offence alleged, the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, and the fact that the petitioner has been in custody for more than two months, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions:
¶7Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Mahalir Neethi Mandram (FTMC), Tiruppur, and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix his photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure his identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the Page4 of 6 petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.
20.08.2026 kmm Note:
¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.
¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. Page5 of 6 To
¶1The Sessions Judge, Mahalir Neethi Mandram (FTMC), Tiruppur.
¶2The Superintendent, Sub Jail, Tiruppur.
¶3The Inspector of Police All Women Police Station - Kongu Nagar, Tiruppur City.
4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. Page6 of 6
N.RAMESH, J. kmm CRL.O.P.No.23270 of 2026
20.08.2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20.08.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.RAMESH CRL.O.P.No.23270 of 2026 Sathiyaseelan ..Petitioner Vs The State rep by the Inspector of Police All Women Police Station - Kongu Nagar, Tiruppur City. (Crime No.28 of 2026) ..Respondent PRAYER: To enlarge the petitioner on bail pending investigation of the case in the Crime No.28 of 2026 on the file of the respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Vijaya Ragavan For Respondent : Mr.M.M.I.Khaleel, Govt.Advocate (Crl.Side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.