E. Geetha v. P. Moorthy

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 02.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI,J. C.M.A.No. 2701 of 2023 E. Geetha

…Appellant Vs.

¶1P. Murthy

¶2ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited, 1st Floor, Arihant Plaza No.84 & 85, Waltax Road, Chennai 600 003.

…Respondents Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act,1988, against the Award dated 03.06.2023 made in M.C.O.P. No.5891 of 2017 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (III Court of Small Causes, Chennai. For Appellant

: Mr. K. Varadha Kamaraj For Respondents : Mr. M. Jayaraj for R2 R1 – Notice dispensed with JUDGME

NT

This appeal, under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, has been filed by the appellant / claimant for enhancement of the sum awarded in M.C.O.P. No.5891 of 2017 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (III Court of Small Causes), Chennai.

¶2Shortly stated, on 25.05.2017 at about 19.45 hours, while the deceased E. Sureshkumar was standing for crossing on the left side of E.C.R. Road, near Nemmeli Dharga, a car bearing Registration No. TN-07-CB-4375 came from Pondy to Chennai, driven by its driver with very high speed in a negligent manner, dashed against the deceased, as a result of which, the deceased sustained fatal injuries and died on the spot. Alleging that the accident took place due to the rash and negligent driving of the driver of the car, the mother of the deceased filed the Claim Petition claiming Rs.30,00,000/- for the death of her son.

¶3The Claims Tribunal framed necessary issues and came to the conclusion that the accident took place due to the rash and negligent driving of the driver of the offending car and awarded compensation of Rs.19,26,400/-. Aggrieved by the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal, the appellant / claimant is on appeal.

¶4Mr. K. Varadha Kamaraj, the learned counsel for the appellant / claimant contended that the though the deceased was a two wheeler Mechanic earning a sum of Rs.15,000/- per month, the Tribunal had fixed the notional monthly income of the deceased as Rs.13,000/-, which is very meagre. Hence, he prayed for enhancement of compensation awarded by the Claims Tribunal.

¶5On the other hand, the learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent / Insurance Company would submit that the learned Tribunal, after analysing the oral and documentary evidence, has awarded just compensation, which requires any interference by this Court.

¶6Heard on both sides. Records perused.

¶7Though it is claimed by the learned counsel for the appellant that the deceased was earning a sum of Rs.15,000/- per month, no documentary evidence was filed by the appellant for proof of income. In the circumstances, the Tribunal had fixed the notional monthly income of the deceased at Rs.13,000/-. However, considering the year of accident, this Court deems it fit to fix the income of the deceased at Rs.14,500/- per month. Since the age of the deceased at the time of accident was 28, the proper multiplier would be 17 and future prospects should be taken at 40%. Since the deceased died as a bachelor, 50% is deducted towards his personal expenses. Hence, the loss of dependency is calculated as under: Calculation Notional Income = Rs.14,500/- 40% Future prospects = Rs.20,300/- After 1/2 deduction = Rs.10,150/- Loss of dependency = Rs.10,150/- x 12 x 17 = Rs.20,70,600/- Under the other heads, the tribunal has awarded just compensation and the same is upheld.

¶8The following tabular column would show the amount awarded by the Tribunal and the enhanced amount awarded by this Court under various heads. S. No. Description Amount awarded by Tribunal (Rs.) Amount awarded by this Court (Rs.) Modification

¶1Loss

of Income 18,56,400/- 20,70,600/- enhanced

¶2Consortium 40,000/- 40,000/- confirmed

¶3Funeral Expenses 15,000/- 15,000/- confirmed

¶4Loss

of Estate 15,000/-15,000/-confirmed Total 19,26,400/-

21,40,600/-Enhanced by 2,14,200/-

¶9In the result, i. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is partly allowed. No costs. ii. The compensation awarded by the Tribunal is enhanced to 21,40,600/- from Rs.19,26,400/-. iii. The appellant / claimant is directed to pay court fee for the enhanced compensation amount, if any, and the Registry is directed to draft the decree only after receipt of Court fee. iv. The second respondent / Insurance Company is directed to deposit the enhanced compensation amount as stated above (less the amount already deposited) together with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of claim petition till the date of deposit to the credit of M.C.O.P. No.5891 of 2017 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (III Court of Small Causes, Chennai, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order/uploading of this order. v. On such deposit being made, the appellant/claimant is at liberty to withdraw the same, after following due process of law.

02.02.2026 bga Internet:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order To

¶1Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (III Court of Small Causes), Chennai.

¶2The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.

¶3ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited, 1st Floor, Arihant Plaza No.84 & 85, Waltax Road, Chennai 600 003. K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI,

J.

bga

C.M.A.No. 2701 of 2023

02.02.2026