VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Prem v. The State Rep by the Inspector of Police

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
21 August 2026
Bench
N.Rameshauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 23543/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow N.Ramesh

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on

23.07.2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 296(B), 137 and 311 of BNS Act in equivalent to Section 147, 148, 294(B), 359, 360, 397 respectively, in Crime No.105 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. Page2 of 5

¶2The allegation against the petitioner is that the accused persons have abducted the de-facto complainant and his friends and they snatched a sum of Rs.12,000/- from the de-facto complainant through ATM and Rs.20,000/- snatched from the de-facto complainant's friend through G-pay by taking them with knife. Hence, the case.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitoner has been in judicial custody since 23.07.2026. He further submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. He also submitted that no specific overtact against the petitioner. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the Petitioner.

¶4Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the Respondent Police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the investigation is still pending against the petitioner. Hence, he opposed the grant of bail to the Petitioner.

¶5I have given my anxious consideration to either side submissions and perused the materials available on record. Page3 of 5

¶6Considering the facts and circumstances of the case; taking note of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), considering the period of incarceration of the petitioner since 23.07.2026 and no specific overtact against him and are not similar in nature, this Court is of the firm view that for the purpose of investigation, further interrogation of the petitioner is not required. Hence, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions.

¶7Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Sriperumbudur, and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; Page4 of 5 [e] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S. 21-08-2026 nvi Note:

¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To

1.The Judicial Magistrate Court, Sriperumbudur.

¶2The Inspector of Police, Padappai Police Station, Kanchipuram District.

3.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Puzhal.

4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. CRLoOPoNo.o23543oofo2026 N.RAMESH,oJ. nvi CRLoOPoNo.o23543oofo2026 21-08-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21-08-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.RAMESH Prem ...Petitioner Vs The State Rep by The Inspector of Police, Padappai Police Station, Kanchipuram District. ...Respondent Crime No.105 of 2026. PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.105 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Muthamizhselvakumar For Respondent(s): Mr.M.M.I.Khaleel, Govt.Advocate (Crl.Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.