VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

A.N.Periasami Padayachi v. Renganayaki Ammal,

ORDERED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
8 April 2026
Bench
R.Sakthivelauthor
Case no.
CMP 9201/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow R.Sakthivel

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 08.04.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL CMP NOS.9201, 9203 AND 9205 OF 2026 IN S.A.NO.1856 OF 2003

1.A.N.Periasami Padayachi (Died) … 1st Appellant in all CMPs'

2.A.P.Raja S/o. Late Periasami Padayachi Oogakur Village Post, Kunnam Taluk, Perambalur District. … 1st Petitioner / 2nd Appellant in all CMPs'

3.S.Suguna (Died) … 3rd Appellant in all CMPs' Legal heirs of 3

rd appellant

4.Samy Kannu S/o. Chidambram

5.Indira D/o. Samy Kannu

6.Agilan (Minor) Represented by his father and Natural Guardian Velavan Page No. 1 of 6

7.Dhevesh (Minor) Represented by his father and Natural Guardian Velavan … Petitioners 4-7 / Proposed Appellant 4-7 in all CMPs' Petitioners 4 to 7 are residing at No.1/5/3, West Street, Agaram Sigoor, Kunnam Taluk, Perambalur District. Versus

1.Renganayaki Ammal (Died)

2.R.Kumar S/o. Late Raju Chettiar Avinangudi Village, Thittakudi Vattam, Cuddalore District. … Respondents / Proposed Respondents in all CMPs' PRAYER IN CMP NO.9201 / 2026: Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963, praying to condone the delay of 1089 days in setting aside the abatement caused due to the death of the third appellant namely S.Suguna in the above Second Appeal. PRAYER IN CMP NO.9203 / 2026: Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Order XXII Rule 9(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, praying to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the third appellant namely S.Suguna in the above Second Appeal. PRAYER IN CMP NO.9205 / 2026: Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Order XXII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, praying to bring on record the petitioners 4 to 7 herein as legal representatives of the deceased third appellant namely S.Suguna and array them as appellants 4 to 7 in the above Second Appeal. For Petitioners in all CMPs' : Mr.K.A.Vimalkumar COMMON ORDER The Civil Miscellaneous Petition in CMP No.9201 of 2026 has been filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963, praying to condone the delay of 1089 days in setting aside the abatement caused due to the death of the third appellant namely S.Suguna in the above Second Appeal.

2.The Civil Miscellaneous Petition in CMP No.9203 of 2026 has been filed under Order XXII Rule 9(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, praying to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the third appellant namely S.Suguna in the above Second Appeal.

3.The Civil Miscellaneous Petition in CMP No.9205 of 2026 has been filed under Order XXII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, praying to bring on record the petitioners 4 to 7 herein as legal representatives of the deceased third appellant namely S.Suguna and array them as appellants 4 to 7 in the above Second Appeal. Page No. 3 of 6

4.This Court has perused the case file.

5.Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavits,

(i) the petition in CMP No.9201 of 2026 is allowed and the delay of 1089 days in seeking to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the third appellant in the above Second Appeal is condoned;

(ii) the petition in CMP No.9203 of 2026 is allowed and the abatement caused due to the death of the deceased third appellant is set aside;

(iii) the petition in CMP No.9205 of 2026 is allowed and the legal representatives of the deceased third appellant as stated in the accompanying affidavit in CMP No.9205 of 2026 are brought on record.

6.Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment in the cause title in the Memorandum of Grounds of Appeal and list the Second Appeal on 05.06.2026.

08.04.2026 (1/7) TK

Page No. 5 of 6 R.oSAKTHIVEL,oJ. TK o CMPoNOS.9201,o9203oANDo9205oOFo2026 IN S.A.NO.1856oOFo2003

08.04.2026 (1/7)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.