- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 23 June 2026
- Bench
- Krishnan Ramasamy
- Case no.
- WP 23876/2026
Judgment
ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 06.04.2026.
¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has made a representation dated 06.04.2026 to conduct survey and to bifurcate the common pathway measuring to a width of 20 feet in property comprised in Survey Nos.89/3B, 89/3B1B, 89/ 3B1A, 89/3A1 and 89/3A2 situate at Paruvadhanahalli Revenue Village, Pennagaram Post and Taluk, Dharmapuri District based on the Settlement deed dated 12.09.2012 registered as Document Page3 of 6 No.3248/ / 2012 and by cancelling the Patta No.8294 issued in favour of 7th Respondent. However, the same was not considered, as on date. Hence, this writ petition.
¶3Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, learned Government's Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 6 and submitted that the petitioner's representation dated 06.04.2026 will be considered within a period of twelve weeks.
¶4Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.
¶5Considering the limited relief sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the respondents 3 & 4 to consider the petitioner's representation dated
06.04.2026 and carry out a survey and complete the process, after giving prior notice to the petitioner as well as respondents 7 & 8 and other aggrieved parties, if any, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
¶6It is made clear that this order is passed only for the purpose of issuing a direction to the official respondent to conduct a survey and lay boundary Page4 of 6 stones at the subject land. In the event any dispute arises regarding the possession of the subject property, the same has to be decided by way of filing a suit before the competent Civil Court.
¶7With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 23-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order VM Page5 of 6 To:
¶1The District Collector. District Collectorate Office, Dharmapuri District.
¶2The District Revenue Officer DRO Office, District Collectorate Building, Dharmapuri District.
¶3The Revenue Divisional Officer, RDO Office, Dharmapuri Taluk, Dharmapuri District.
¶4The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Pennagaram Taluk, Dharmapuri District.
¶5The Land Surveyor, Taluk Office, Paruvadanahalli Birka, Pennagaram Taluk, Dharmapuri District.
¶6The Village Administrative Officer, Paruvadanahalli Revenue Village, Pennagaram Taluk, Dharmapuri District. WPoNo.o23876oofo2026 KRISHNANoRAMASAMY,oJ. VM WPoNo.o23876oofo2026 23-06-2026 Page6oofo6
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Thamaraiselvi ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector, District Collectorate Office, Dharmapuri District. 2. The District Revenue Officer, DRO Office, District Collectorate Building, Dharmapuri District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, RDO Office, Dharmapuri Taluk, Dharmapuri District. 4. The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Pennagaram Taluk, Dharmapuri District. 5. The Land Surveyor, Taluk Office, Paruvadanahalli Birka, Pennagaram Taluk, Dharmapuri District. 6. The Village Administrative Officer, Paruvadanahalli Revenue Village, Pennagaram Taluk, Dharmapuri District. 7. Deepa 8. Susila ..Respondent(s) Page2 of 6 Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus Directing the 4th and 5th Respondents to consider and to pass appropriate orders based on petitioner representation dated 06.04.2026 requesting to survey and to bifurcate the common pathway measuring to a width of 20 feet in property comprised in Survey Nos.89/3B, 89/3B1B, 89/ 3B1A, 89/3A1 and 89/3A2 situate at Paruvadhanahalli Revenue Village, Pennagaram Post and Taluk, Dharmapuri District based on the Settlement deed dated 12.09.2012 registered as Document No.3248/ / 2012 and by cancelling the Patta No.8294 issued in name of 7th Respondent. For Petitioner(s): Mr.D.Thirumoorthy For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, Govt Counsel for R1 to R6
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.