VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

S.S. Parthiban, v. The Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd.,

DISPOSED OF WITH DIRECTION
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
11 June 2026
Bench
M.Dhandapaniauthor
Case no.
WP 22076/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow M.Dhandapani

Judgment

ORDER Since, separate court fee has been paid by the petitioners, W.M.P.No.23955 of 2026 filed seeking to permit the petitioners to join and file a single Writ Petition, is ordered as prayed for. Page3 of 6

¶2The present Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the Respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 06.12.2025 and reduce the license fee by 50% on account of the change in policy with regard to the collection of empty bottles by TASMAC.

¶3The petitioners are the licensees for the sale of eatables and collecting empty bottles in the bars which are attached to the IMFL shops run by the Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd. (for short 'TASMAC'). They submitted a representation dated 06.12.2025 to the respondents requesting to reduce the license fee by 50% in view of the policy decision taken by the 1st respondent with regard to collection of empty liquor bottles by the TASMAC. However, the said representation has not been considered so far. Hence, the present Writ Petition.

¶4Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that, it would suffice, if this Court issues a direction to respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 06.12.2025 and pass appropriate orders on the same within the time that may be stipulated by this Court.

¶5On the above contention, this Court heard the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. Page4 of 6

¶6In view of the limited relief sought for in this Writ Petition, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 06.12.2025 and pass appropriate orders on the same in accordance with law within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and any other interested parties.

¶7The Writ Petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid direction. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, other connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 11-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order NHS Page5 of 6 To

¶1The Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd., (TASMAC) Thazhamuthu Natarajar Building, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.

¶2The Senior Regional Manager, The Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd., (TASMAC) Ambattur, Chennai.

¶3The District Manager, The Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd., (TASMAC) Thirumazhisai Zone No.III, Kancheepuram North District, Chennai 600 123 Page6 of 6

M.DHANDAPANI, J. NHS and W.M.P.Nos.23955, 23956 & 23957 of 2026 11-06-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and W.M.P.Nos.23955, 23956 & 23957 of 2026 1. S.S. Parthiban, 2. Agastinraj Jerom, 3. S.Manikandan, 4. Sathishkumar Vellaichamy, 5. L. Sathish 6. M.Gopinath 7. Sairam, 8. N.Saravanan, 9. R.D. Veerasamy 10.A. Veeramani, 11.Sundararaj, 12.C. Singaravelu 13.S. Sakthivel 14.Noushath Ali, 15.Lakshmipathi Neervannan 16.Thamilalagan 17.S.Sathyamoorthy 18.S.Krishnamoorthy 19.Ramesh Ramasamy 20.R. Kalleshwaran 21.M. Thondiraj 22.Salet Sweetlin Raja 23.P. Selvaraj 24.S. Balamurugan 25.K. Balaji 26.K. Rajaji 27.Rajesh Gandhi 28.M.S. Ramachandran 29.N. Nesan 30.A. Rajendran 31.N. Prabakaran 32.P.Gobi Kannan 33.R. Jayakumar ..Petitioner(s) Page2 of 6 Vs 1. The Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd., (TASMAC) Thazhamuthu Natarajar Building, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008. 2. The Senior Regional Manager, The Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd., (TASMAC) Ambattur, Chennai. 3. The District Manager, The Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd., (TASMAC) Thirumazhisai Zone No.III, Kancheepuram North District, Chennai 600 123 ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 06.12.2025 and reduce the license fee by 50% on account of the change in policy with regard to the collection of empty bottles by TASMAC. For Petitioner(s): Ms.AL.Gandhimathi, Sr. Counsel for Mr.L.Palani Muthu For Respondent(s): Mr.K.Balakrishnan, Standing Counsel for Respondents

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.